13rin
Member
+977|6903
http://news.aol.com/story/_a/iraq-says- … 2609990001

More proof of progress.  Weak hearts be ashamed.
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something.  - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6961|Long Island, New York
So, when's the next guy taking his place?
13rin
Member
+977|6903

Poseidon wrote:

So, when's the next guy taking his place?
Doesn't matter. He'll fall faster.

*So does that game you glorify in your sig allow you to kill soldiers too along with cops? Nice.

Last edited by DBBrinson1 (2008-05-08 20:18:59)

I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something.  - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
Megalomaniac
Formerly known as Missionless
+92|6751|105 RVK
I barely even care about the mid-east conflicts anymore. Its all the same.
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6961|Long Island, New York

DBBrinson1 wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

So, when's the next guy taking his place?
Doesn't matter. He'll fall faster.
Right. Haven't you learned the way that terrorism works? One guys falls, and another's set-up to take his place.

This guy lasted a little less than 2 years. Al Zarqawi lasted how many? 2, right?
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6835|'Murka

Well we must be sure we don't inconvenience him in any way and always say "pretty please" when questioning him. Otherwise, we'd be torturing him, and we certainly can't have that...
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6835|'Murka

Poseidon wrote:

DBBrinson1 wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

So, when's the next guy taking his place?
Doesn't matter. He'll fall faster.
Right. Haven't you learned the way that terrorism works? One guys falls, and another's set-up to take his place.

This guy lasted a little less than 2 years. Al Zarqawi lasted how many? 2, right?
I think AMZ lasted 3 or 4.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7024|132 and Bush

Poseidon wrote:

DBBrinson1 wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

So, when's the next guy taking his place?
Doesn't matter. He'll fall faster.
Right. Haven't you learned the way that terrorism works? One guys falls, and another's set-up to take his place.

This guy lasted a little less than 2 years. Al Zarqawi lasted how many? 2, right?
It matters operationally.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6961|Long Island, New York

FEOS wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

DBBrinson1 wrote:


Doesn't matter. He'll fall faster.
Right. Haven't you learned the way that terrorism works? One guys falls, and another's set-up to take his place.

This guy lasted a little less than 2 years. Al Zarqawi lasted how many? 2, right?
I think AMZ lasted 3 or 4.
4? He died in June 2006...we only invaded in 2003.
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6961|Long Island, New York
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6979
No!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7391423.stm

Irrelevant anyway. Their kind of terrorism is open source. Anyone from Timbuktu to Tokyo can take a notion to cause bloody mayhem in the name of their 'cause' at any time of day or night. 'Leaders' are relatively inconsequential.
M.O.A.B
'Light 'em up!'
+1,220|6646|Escea

FEOS wrote:

Well we must be sure we don't inconvenience him in any way and always say "pretty please" when questioning him. Otherwise, we'd be torturing him, and we certainly can't have that...
Don't forget the biscuits and complimentary massage
Tetrino
International OMGWTFBBQ
+200|7154|Uhh... erm...
Like these people need a leader they never meet in person to strap C4 to themselves and run into the nearest Humvee.
JahManRed
wank
+646|7052|IRELAND

Your so anxious to justify the total fuck up that is the Iraqi war/invasion/nation building that you didn't even get past the first line of the article you linked to. You just jumped on here with, "I was right all along. The millions of displaced people, the billions of dollars wasted, the thousands of American lives and hundreds of thousands of Iraqi lives lost are all justified because they/we got a leader who will be replaced in hours"

"However, the U.S. military on Friday said there were "no operational reports" to confirm the capture of the leader of al-Qaida in Iraq as stated by Iraqi officials, adding the capture of another insurgent might have caused confusion."
13rin
Member
+977|6903

JahManRed wrote:

Your so anxious to justify the total fuck up that is the Iraqi war/invasion/nation building that you didn't even get past the first line of the article you linked to. You just jumped on here with, "I was right all along. The millions of displaced people, the billions of dollars wasted, the thousands of American lives and hundreds of thousands of Iraqi lives lost are all justified because they/we got a leader who will be replaced in hours"

"However, the U.S. military on Friday said there were "no operational reports" to confirm the capture of the leader of al-Qaida in Iraq as stated by Iraqi officials, adding the capture of another insurgent might have caused confusion."
Getting rid of a dictator who's committed horrific atricities is a "total fuck up".  Riiiight.  Sorry for jumping the gun in celebration.  Wait.  No, I'm really not sorry in the least.  I'm confident he'll be caught/killed eventually.
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something.  - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6979

DBBrinson1 wrote:

Getting rid of a dictator who's committed horrific atricities is a "total fuck up".  Riiiight.  Sorry for jumping the gun in celebration.  Wait.  No, I'm really not sorry in the least.  I'm confident he'll be caught/killed eventually.
Didn't you sell said dictator weapons? Riiiiiiiight.
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|7098|Canberra, AUS
If this is your definition of a success, I baulk at what a failure is.

Basically what you've done is destabilize much of the region, awaken ancient secterian + tribal conflicts and gave Iran shitloads of leverage.

And you were so eager to go into Iraq you decided to all but ignore Afghanistan, making what should've been a solid, strong platform into a now delicately poised situation.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
JahManRed
wank
+646|7052|IRELAND

DBBrinson1 wrote:

JahManRed wrote:

Your so anxious to justify the total fuck up that is the Iraqi war/invasion/nation building that you didn't even get past the first line of the article you linked to. You just jumped on here with, "I was right all along. The millions of displaced people, the billions of dollars wasted, the thousands of American lives and hundreds of thousands of Iraqi lives lost are all justified because they/we got a leader who will be replaced in hours"

"However, the U.S. military on Friday said there were "no operational reports" to confirm the capture of the leader of al-Qaida in Iraq as stated by Iraqi officials, adding the capture of another insurgent might have caused confusion."
Getting rid of a dictator who's committed horrific atrocities is a "total fuck up".  Riiiight.  Sorry for jumping the gun in celebration.  Wait.  No, I'm really not sorry in the least.  I'm confident he'll be caught/killed eventually.
Who are you talking about, Osamba, who murdered thousands of Americans? Or Saddam who never posed a threat to anyone in the west? Or perhaps you are talking about this opportunist leader who is only a figure head to fanatics and who can be replaced in minutes?
I don't know. If I was family of someone lost in 9/11 "eventually" wouldn't be good enough. What, eventually after we have invaded Iran? Eventually we will get Osaba when we keep knocking of leader after leader in Iraqi until every Sunni male in Iraqi is dead? When is the USA going to actually fight its war on terror instead of its war off terror? And take the fight to the terrorist instead of creating them?

Got me thinking about the crusades. The last time westerners went off on a cleansing mission in the middle east on the last crusade, they, in fact, after 200 years, strengthened Islam. The Muslims took on the Murderous Christian holey warrior mentality and have run with it since. They strengthened Islam exponentially, undoing the work of their predecessors. Perhaps we are at the beginning of another Crusade (Bushes words, not mine) and a new age of interference with the middle east.(don't think we ever stopped interfering) The end result will be the same. The strengthening and further radicalisation of Islam globally. And just like the final Crusaders, it was all about money and they where ultimately fucked by Venation traders, the forefathers of capitalism, which is the real reason behind the latest "liberation" of the middle east. /lament
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,822|6530|eXtreme to the maX
Getting rid of a dictator who's committed horrific atricities is a "total fuck up".  Riiiight.  Sorry for jumping the gun in celebration.
Funny that the US supported Saddam when he was comitting said atrocities.
Fuck Israel
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,822|6530|eXtreme to the maX
Well we must be sure we don't inconvenience him in any way and always say "pretty please" when questioning him. Otherwise, we'd be torturing him, and we certainly can't have that...
Correct, because then we would be evil godless terrorists just like him.
Fuck Israel
too_money2007
Member
+145|6732|Keller, Tx
Jihad!
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6829|North Carolina
From the article: "Thousands of civilians already have fled Sadr City — home to nearly 40 percent of Baghdad's population — and aid groups say some areas are desperately short of food and medicine after seven weeks of street battles."

That doesn't sound like good news to me.
13rin
Member
+977|6903

CameronPoe wrote:

DBBrinson1 wrote:

Getting rid of a dictator who's committed horrific atrocities is a "total fuck up".  Riiiight.  Sorry for jumping the gun in celebration.  Wait.  No, I'm really not sorry in the least.  I'm confident he'll be caught/killed eventually.
Didn't you sell said dictator weapons? Riiiiiiiight.
So wouldn't that make it our responsibility to get them back? Riiiight.

Spark wrote:

If this is your definition of a success, I baulk at what a failure is.

Basically what you've done is destabilize much of the region, awaken ancient secterian + tribal conflicts and gave Iran shitloads of leverage.

And you were so eager to go into Iraq you decided to all but ignore Afghanistan, making what should've been a solid, strong platform into a now delicately poised situation.
Failure would have been doing nothing, or bitching about how long it's taking.  Eager to go into Iraq?  No, we weren't -But Saddam's failure to comply with UN resolutions helped immensely.  I guess thing were much simpler over there back when saddam could just gas those he disliked.  Yea, I don't buy your analysis of Afghanistan either.

Dilbert_X wrote:

Getting rid of a dictator who's committed horrific atricities is a "total fuck up".  Riiiight.  Sorry for jumping the gun in celebration.
Funny that the US supported Saddam when he was comitting said atrocities.
So why weren't you bitching then?

Last edited by DBBrinson1 (2008-05-09 06:32:52)

I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something.  - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6979

DBBrinson1 wrote:

So wouldn't that make it our responsibility to get them back? Riiiight.
I get it - against all honorable principles sell weapons to dictators (preferably ones with oil) so that at a later date you can 'invade to spread freedom and democracy' (using serious heavy weaponry to do it). Now I realise why you've been selling so much materiel to Saudi Arabia!
13rin
Member
+977|6903

CameronPoe wrote:

DBBrinson1 wrote:

So wouldn't that make it our responsibility to get them back? Riiiight.
I get it - against all honorable principles sell weapons to dictators (preferably ones with oil) so that at a later date you can 'invade to spread freedom and democracy' (using serious heavy weaponry to do it). Now I realise why you've been selling so much materiel to Saudi Arabia!
Look at the context of the time and situation that was occuring when the US sold weapons to Saddam.  Pretty sure we wanted to be friends...

Hehe.  Don't forget about the F-14's we sold Iran, now only if we could get Chavez to buy some of our stuff....

Last edited by DBBrinson1 (2008-05-09 06:46:29)

I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something.  - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard