CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6978
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7412247.stm

Israel talking with Syria without preconditions? What would warmonger McCain have to say about this?

Incidentally with all the McCain/Bush Iran warmongering how much do you think a barrel of oil will cost either decide to unilaterally airstrike Iran....?

Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-05-21 03:18:55)

Masques
Black Panzer Party
+184|7145|Eastern PA


JahManRed
wank
+646|7051|IRELAND

The man is an Idiot. Who does not seam to know what direction he is going with regards to homeland policies. As him about Iran and Syria and he is an expert. Because if he gets in he means to continue the republican agenda of warmongering and wars for resources while letting his nation fall apart.
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7180|Argentina
He is old.
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,822|6529|eXtreme to the maX
McCain is the perfect neo-con President.
He clearly has no thoughts of his own which stand even to the slightest scrutiny.
He is an empty vessel, waiting to be given his programming by Cheney.
Fuck Israel
Pug
UR father's brother's nephew's former roommate
+652|6965|Texas - Bigger than France

CameronPoe wrote:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7412247.stm

Israel talking with Syria without preconditions? What would warmonger McCain have to say about this?

Incidentally with all the McCain/Bush Iran warmongering how much do you think a barrel of oil will cost either decide to unilaterally airstrike Iran....?
I'm surprised on four fronts:
1) Syria and Israel are discussing peace
2) I've never see you be positive about peace talks with Israel.  When US sponsored talks, you called them a sham.
3) Associating the current presidential race with this issue is like asking my dog's opinion on Global Warming
4) What's the cost of oil/Iran airstrikes have to do with this topic?
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7024|132 and Bush

It's like a rock concert in downtown Tampa today.
http://www2.tbo.com/content/2008/may/21 … news-metro
People camped out overnight..lol
Xbone Stormsurgezz
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6978

Pug wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7412247.stm

Israel talking with Syria without preconditions? What would warmonger McCain have to say about this?

Incidentally with all the McCain/Bush Iran warmongering how much do you think a barrel of oil will cost either decide to unilaterally airstrike Iran....?
I'm surprised on four fronts:
1) Syria and Israel are discussing peace
2) I've never see you be positive about peace talks with Israel.  When US sponsored talks, you called them a sham.
3) Associating the current presidential race with this issue is like asking my dog's opinion on Global Warming
4) What's the cost of oil/Iran airstrikes have to do with this topic?
1. Why would that not be a good thing?
2. Talking is necessary - the other option is the obliteration of either all Israelis or all Arabs. THe relative trustworthiness of the parties involved is questionable but Israel have NEVER been so open about speaking unconditionally to a sworn enemy, which can only be a good thing.
3. From my watching of CNN the last two nights it seems that the race is saturated with foreign policy jibes back and forth between Obama and McCain, McCain criticising Obama's willingness to talk and calling him 'naive'.
4. See Obama/McCain foreign policy jibes in point 3...

Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-05-21 06:38:21)

Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,822|6529|eXtreme to the maX
Incidentally with all the McCain/Bush Iran warmongering how much do you think a barrel of oil will cost either decide to unilaterally airstrike Iran....?
>$200/barrel, maybe $300.
Here's a point, if the US bombs Iran they would pretty well have to invade to take control of the oil.
The alternative is the Iranians turn the taps off.
Fuck Israel
Pug
UR father's brother's nephew's former roommate
+652|6965|Texas - Bigger than France

CameronPoe wrote:

Pug wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7412247.stm

Israel talking with Syria without preconditions? What would warmonger McCain have to say about this?

Incidentally with all the McCain/Bush Iran warmongering how much do you think a barrel of oil will cost either decide to unilaterally airstrike Iran....?
I'm surprised on four fronts:
1) Syria and Israel are discussing peace
2) I've never see you be positive about peace talks with Israel.  When US sponsored talks, you called them a sham.
3) Associating the current presidential race with this issue is like asking my dog's opinion on Global Warming
4) What's the cost of oil/Iran airstrikes have to do with this topic?
1. Why would that not be a good thing?
2. Talking is necessary - the other option is the obliteration of either all Israelis or all Arabs. THe relative trustworthiness of the parties involved is questionable but Israel have NEVER been so open about speaking unconditionally to a sworn enemy, which can only be a good thing.
3. From my watching of CNN the last two nights it seems that the race is saturated with foreign policy jibes back and forth between Obama and McCain, McCain criticising Obama's willingness to talk and calling him 'naive'.
4. See Obama/McCain foreign policy jibes in point 3...
Why would you believe McCain is displeased about them talking?
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7024|132 and Bush

The parts Iran uses to maintain their drilling equipment comes from Canada (NATO), Japan (Major Non-Nato Ally), and the United States (NATO). If we weren't so dependent on oil we could be the ones deciding to turn their taps off.  It cost also Iran $9 more per barrel to pull it out of the ground compared to the Saudis.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6978

Pug wrote:

Why would you believe McCain is displeased about them talking?
Because he seems to be averse to talking to 'enemies' as far as I can see, if his criticism soundbites re Obama's foreign policy are anything to go by.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-05-21 06:58:07)

13rin
Member
+977|6902

CameronPoe wrote:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7412247.stm

Israel talking with Syria without preconditions? What would warmonger McCain have to say about this?

Incidentally with all the McCain/Bush Iran warmongering how much do you think a barrel of oil will cost either decide to unilaterally airstrike Iran....?
Obama is a moron.  You can't make deals with fanatics who don't respect you, have no real intention of honoring any agreement, and who's final goal is to see you and your people destroyed.

Who is really the warmonger Cam?  My money is on Amadinnajaket.

And Cam what do you want us to tell Iran?  "Stop giving border access to insurgents.  Stop giving insurgents weapons and supplies. Stop or we will..."  What Cam?  "Stop and we'll give you money?  Stop or we'll bomb you?"  Give me a break!  It is pointless dialogue and you know it too.



The US military is looking at alternative fuel sources.  In fact they are using some in our B-1's.  This is very good news for the US and bad news for the Mid East.

Dilbert_X wrote:

McCain is the perfect neo-con President.
He clearly has no thoughts of his own which stand even to the slightest scrutiny.
He is an empty vessel, waiting to be given his programming by Cheney.
Are you making this up as you go along?  Is this one of those I said it so it's true things?  Look at McCain's voting record.  McCain a NeoCon? HAHAHA.  But thanks for the laugh...

Last edited by DBBrinson1 (2008-05-21 07:33:38)

I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something.  - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6978

DBBrinson1 wrote:

Obama is a moron.  You can't make deals with fanatics who don't respect you, have no real intention of honoring any agreement, and who's final goal is to see you and your people destroyed.

Who is really the warmonger Cam?  My money is on Amadinnajaket.

And Cam what do you want us to tell Iran?  "Stop giving border access to insurgents.  Stop giving insurgents weapons and supplies. Stop or we will..."  What Cam?  "Stop and we'll give you money?  Stop or we'll bomb you?"  Give me a break!  It is pointless dialogue and you know it too.

The US military is looking at alternative fuel sources.  In fact they are using some in our B-1's.  This is very good news for the US and bad news for the Mid East.
Iran have never once, not ever, and has never shown any inclination of seeing 'you and your people destroyed'. You're delusional if you think that or if you think they would ever be capable of such nonsense. All Iran are guilty of is trying to exert their influence locally and to maintain sovereignty over their own politics and resources. It is the US, a nation that lies thousands of miles from Iran, that is the one doing the threatening when it comes to US-Iran relations. In case you hadn't noticed Israel is not a part of the USA. What the US need to do is to realise that they have to afford these nations parity of esteem and not maraud all over their turf like some global resource-hungry consumerist overlord. Ahmedinejad, who is a moron, was still brave enough to come to your doorstep to speak at your unviersities and yet you guys are too chicken to speak to him? Pathetic.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-05-21 07:48:12)

Pug
UR father's brother's nephew's former roommate
+652|6965|Texas - Bigger than France

CameronPoe wrote:

Pug wrote:

Why would you believe McCain is displeased about them talking?
Because he seems to be averse to talking to 'enemies' as far as I can see, if his criticism soundbites re Obama's foreign policy are anything to go by.
I have a hard time believing that anyone on the planet doesn't want peace in the Middle East.  I think is naive to think McCain's pissed.

It's like saying "I bet Syria's allies are pissed about this" <--- why? Don't you think they want peace?
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6978

Pug wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

Pug wrote:

Why would you believe McCain is displeased about them talking?
Because he seems to be averse to talking to 'enemies' as far as I can see, if his criticism soundbites re Obama's foreign policy are anything to go by.
I have a hard time believing that anyone on the planet doesn't want peace in the Middle East.  I think is naive to think McCain's pissed.

It's like saying "I bet Syria's allies are pissed about this" <--- why? Don't you think they want peace?
But wouldn't McCain regard it as futile and 'naive', much as he has accused Obama of being by promoting such a concept?
Pug
UR father's brother's nephew's former roommate
+652|6965|Texas - Bigger than France

CameronPoe wrote:

But wouldn't McCain regard it as futile and 'naive', much as he has accused Obama of being by promoting such a concept?
Ahh, ok.  There's the context missing in the OP.  I haven't been able to watch the news closely.  I'll need to find that article to comment further.

I'm not quite understanding your last post, so maybe I'll trip over an article that will allow some clarity.  I seems like McCain's off base if he's claiming diplomacy shouldn't be tried.  I was always under the impression he favors diplomacy, but it's likely Obama would talk things over a bit longer than McCain.

But I still stand by my thought - I think its naive to think McCain's pissed.
AutralianChainsaw
Member
+65|6621

Masques wrote:



LOL at the moment when McCain tell that al quaida is training in Iran and you see the zionist liebermann telling him in the ear what to say hahahaha

I cannot believe that this man is the republican nominee.. so many people in the US are clueless.. McCain is even more stupid than Bush..

Wtf wake up republicans

How can someone support that moron??!?
IRONCHEF
Member
+385|6914|Northern California

Dilbert_X wrote:

Incidentally with all the McCain/Bush Iran warmongering how much do you think a barrel of oil will cost either decide to unilaterally airstrike Iran....?
>$200/barrel, maybe $300.
Here's a point, if the US bombs Iran they would pretty well have to invade to take control of the oil.
The alternative is the Iranians turn the taps off.
We get very little if any oil from Iran.  I think China and Russia get oil from them, but our % is very small.  Invading Iran will shorten the overall world supply of oil maybe, but hey, it's not like it'll change the value of our dollar which is the real cause of our $4/gallon gas.  I paid $4.05 per gallon yesterday.  Yum.
13rin
Member
+977|6902

CameronPoe wrote:

Iran have never once, not ever, and has never shown any inclination of seeing 'you and your people destroyed'. You're delusional if you think that or if you think they would ever be capable of such nonsense. All Iran are guilty of is trying to exert their influence locally and to maintain sovereignty over their own politics and resources. It is the US, a nation that lies thousands of miles from Iran, that is the one doing the threatening when it comes to US-Iran relations. In case you hadn't noticed Israel is not a part of the USA. What the US need to do is to realise that they have to afford these nations parity of esteem and not maraud all over their turf like some global resource-hungry consumerist overlord. Ahmedinejad, who is a moron, was still brave enough to come to your doorstep to speak at your unviersities and yet you guys are too chicken to speak to him? Pathetic.
See Cam, here in the USA we look out for our allies whoever they may be.  Hell, we even in the past have been know to give huminatarian aid to other countries needing it we don't like.  Seeing how as the USA kinda help set up Israel, you may be able to form a connection as to our interests in its security.  Government with radical differing political structures tend not to get along, its a fact.    I think the if given the opportunity Amadineajihad would definitely wipe Israel off the map... Pretty sure (as to much disagreement from you) he's even alluded it if not outright said it.

What Iran needs to do is to stop undermining the US in Iraq.  The region would be much more stable and better off if Iran wasn't constantly fucking with Iraq.

I heard your favorite song again here though you changed the name of it from the "Imperialistic USA" to the "Global resource-hungry Consumerist Overlord" but I really think you were refering to China there. 

Amadinejihad comming to America to speak showed Bush's class, not Amadinejaihads bravery.  Again, what do you want Bush to tell him?  "Sorry?"
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something.  - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
CaptainSpaulding71
Member
+119|6780|CA, USA

CameronPoe wrote:

Iran have never once, not ever, and has never shown any inclination of seeing 'you and your people destroyed'. You're delusional if you think that or if you think they would ever be capable of such nonsense. All Iran are guilty of is trying to exert their influence locally and to maintain sovereignty over their own politics and resources. It is the US, a nation that lies thousands of miles from Iran, that is the one doing the threatening when it comes to US-Iran relations. In case you hadn't noticed Israel is not a part of the USA. What the US need to do is to realise that they have to afford these nations parity of esteem and not maraud all over their turf like some global resource-hungry consumerist overlord. Ahmedinejad, who is a moron, was still brave enough to come to your doorstep to speak at your unviersities and yet you guys are too chicken to speak to him? Pathetic.
uh...so you claim that the 'death to usa' chants, the burning of american flags, the huge building size posters of destruction of USA are just idle talk?  Iran is right now fighting a proxy war in Iraq.  Also fought one in Lebanon just recently with Israel.  They are already testing us in the straights of hormuz with their dinghy gunboats.  will they ever bite the bullet and fight the US outright?  come on.  unless they have an equalizer like nukes, this won't happen, but they will do (and are doing) everything they can to undermine everything we do in the ME - even if it is for the better. 

speaking to terrorists give them legitimacy.  hence the US does not want to do this.  squeaky wheel gets the grease is not what we should be doing.

Last edited by CaptainSpaulding71 (2008-05-21 08:56:36)

CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6978

CaptainSpaulding71 wrote:

uh...so you claim that the 'death to usa' chants, the burning of american flags, the huge building size posters of destruction of USA are just idle talk?  Iran is right now fighting a proxy war in Iraq.  Also fought one in Lebanon just recently with Israel.  They are already testing us in the straights of hormuz with their dinghy gunboats.  will they ever bite the bullet and fight the US outright?  come on.  unless they have an equalizer like nukes, this won't happen, but they will do (and are doing) everything they can to undermine everything we do in the ME - even if it is for the better. 

speaking to terrorists give them legitimacy.  hence the US does not want to do this.  squeaky wheel gets the grease is not what we should be doing.
Has the Iranian government ever advocated a full-on war with the US? An attack on the US homeland? Newsflash Mr. Spaulding: you are in their neighbourhood and you should not be there. You are thousands of miles from home. Everything the US has done since the early part of last century has involved keeping the Iranian people down - read up on the Shah, Mohammed Mossadeq and the rest. Is it any wonder they are scared of and want to neutralise the threat posed by 'world overlord' USA? Who wouldn't want to make sure they had a deterrent to grubby self-interested oil-hungry Israel-friendly US hands? The USSR had nukes, the USSR fought proxy wars with the US and the USSR had anti-US propaganda - the USSR never attacked the US. Not in 45 years. Do you understand what deterrency is? Do you really hold the warped view that Iran would risk the utter annihilation of their entire nation for the off-chance that they could possiby do some relatively minor damage to the eminently powerful western world? That sir is called delusion. There would be no reason for Iran to have acrimonious relations with the US if it were not for the US's refusal to recognise their rights as an equal member of the international community with the form of government of their choosing. I don't see the US condemning China for being communist or Saudi Arabia for being a Wahabi brainwash dicatatorship... The US have pushed Iran to where they are now by constantly trying to undermine the Iranian people since the year dot. As for the 'legitimacy' bullshit: Israel is a nation founded on terrorism. How can middle eastern nations be expected to talk to them if you refuse to talk to a nation you seem to regard as a 'terrorist'? Do you just believe in a world where 'last man standing wins' or soemthing? It's funny how peace was achieved in Northern Ireland after the Brits engaged with the IRA. If there are no words then there can only be a war of annihilation. Simple as that.

PS Fuck Israel. What the fuck does Israel have to do with this? Israel has nothing to do with the US. If you want to advocate supporting Israel militarily then know full well that you are supporting just one more bad apple in the rotten pile of shit that is the middle east. Israel has its own nuclear arsenal anwyay and is quite quite capable of defending itself. Its soldiers are far more capable and battle hardened than those of the US, they'll be just fine.
CaptainSpaulding71
Member
+119|6780|CA, USA
wow cam...wipe the froth from your mouth and chill out.  we get it.  you hate israel.  you love the palestinians and islamists.  i simply disagree with you.

Last edited by CaptainSpaulding71 (2008-05-21 09:41:17)

IRONCHEF
Member
+385|6914|Northern California
I think Cam just doesn't like the idea of Israel bullying everyone because they're allied with the US...both of which could care less about the ME and it's people and would gladly supplant them for the oil.  I agree.  If Iran nuked Isreal, oh well.  Even if we didn't ally with Israel and Iran nuked them, again, oh well.  They more than provoke the responses they get.

Separately, our support of Israel is criminal..JUST as much as Iran helps terrorists organizations.  In fact, it could EASILY be said that we are supporting terrorists (israel) of them.  If you asked the average housewife in Palestine, someone non-militant or violent in any way what she thought of the USA or Israel, I'm guessing she'd say the same thing we say of her and her people..terrorists.

So all things being equal...Israel are the bastards that need to go, not Palestine, Iran, Syria, Jordan, Iraq, Turkey or any other Arab or Asian nations that we feel like bossing around.
13rin
Member
+977|6902

CameronPoe wrote:

Has the Iranian government ever advocated a full-on war with the US? An attack on the US homeland? Newsflash Mr. Spaulding: you are in their neighbourhood and you should not be there. You are thousands of miles from home. Everything the US has done since the early part of last century has involved keeping the Iranian people down - read up on the Shah, Mohammed Mossadeq and the rest.
Well, it didn't take me long to find this:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/us_worl … s_aga.html
I'm pretty sure military parades with jeeps bearing banners with slogans reading "Death to America" is pretty close.  I could spend more than 3 seconds looking if you'd like though. 

Also doesn't the Iranian state run the news there?  So the state puts forth images of US flag burnings and effigies of Uncle Sam & Bush being burned.  Also the evidence of Iran's involvement in Iraq is more that enough to assume we ain't gonna be friends.

As great as the USA is, it can't go back in time and change the past.  Israel is here to stay.  Get used to it.  Why the hell wouldn't the US back Iraq in a war when it looked like it was going to absorb Iran and it was obvious they would be obliterated because the Iranians getting better equipment/training/supplies from a country that truly was imperialistic and oppressive (USSR)?  Fast forward... Again not being able to change the past but control the future, my President decided to rectify a wrong by removing Saddam and his successors (kids).  We'd be a lot closer to leaving Iraq by now if Iran wasn't stoking the ashes.  I think that Iran wants Iraq.  I've seen the IRA/Palestine banners, but hell Cam, what dog do you have in this fight?

CameronPoe wrote:

Is it any wonder they are scared of and want to neutralise the threat posed by 'world overlord' USA? Who wouldn't want to make sure they had a deterrent to grubby self-interested oil-hungry Israel-friendly US hands?
Same "world overlord" that gives billions in aid to 3rd word countries when the rest of the word looks the other way.  Just for a second imagine the US had collapsed and the USSR won the cold war, how long do you think Iran would have kept its sovereignty?

CameronPoe wrote:

The USSR had nukes, the USSR fought proxy wars with the US and the USSR had anti-US propaganda - the USSR never attacked the US. Not in 45 years. Do you understand what deterrence is? Do you really hold the warped view that Iran would risk the utter annihilation of their entire nation for the off-chance that they could possibly do some relatively minor damage to the eminently powerful western world? That sir is called delusion.
I think you are delusional if you hold the view that Iran is a peace loving country with nothing but peaceful intentions toward its neighbors. 

CameronPoe wrote:

There would be no reason for Iran to have acrimonious relations with the US if it were not for the US's refusal to recognise their rights as an equal member of the international community with the form of government of their choosing.
It ain't due to the form of government of their choosing why the US isn't talking to them.  It is because of what their form of government does and condones.

CameronPoe wrote:

I don't see the US condemning China for being communist or Saudi Arabia for being a Wahabi brainwash dicatatorship... The US have pushed Iran to where they are now by constantly trying to undermine the Iranian people since the year dot.
I sure as shit wish we would.  I'm tired of not being able to buy American.  I'm tired of hearing how bad the US is when there are so many other countries like China that are the evil ones. 

As to the Iranian suppression... What should the US have done?  We don't like what you are doing and what you stand for so we'll reward you in some way.... Like maybe pay them off like the Clintons did to the North Koreans?  Yea that worked really well.  Not only did the NK's get the bomb, we fucking paid for it.  Fuck Iran and their fanatical religious policies.

CameronPoe wrote:

As for the 'legitimacy' bullshit: Israel is a nation founded on terrorism. How can middle eastern nations be expected to talk to them if you refuse to talk to a nation you seem to regard as a 'terrorist'? Do you just believe in a world where 'last man standing wins' or soemthing? It's funny how peace was achieved in Northern Ireland after the Brits engaged with the IRA. If there are no words then there can only be a war of annihilation. Simple as that.
Again Cam... WHAT DO YOU WANT THE US TO SAY?

The last time America dealt with fanatics was in WWII - Japan.  We won.  How?  We faced them with certain annihilation.  I think that Japan is doing pretty good now.

CameronPoe wrote:

PS Fuck Israel. What the fuck does Israel have to do with this? Israel has nothing to do with the US. If you want to advocate supporting Israel militarily then know full well that you are supporting just one more bad apple in the rotten pile of shit that is the middle east. Israel has its own nuclear arsenal anwyay and is quite quite capable of defending itself. Its soldiers are far more capable and battle hardened than those of the US, they'll be just fine.
Reread your OP.  You put Israel in this.

Last edited by DBBrinson1 (2008-05-21 13:18:59)

I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something.  - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard