BF2S Forums This woman is a complete tool. (Clinton remark about Robert Kennedy)

If Obama is assassinated in June.. in California we have got a real problem in this country.

If Obama actually was assassinated, then a third party candidate might win, because everyone would either suspect Hillary or McCain was behind it.

Perhaps Clinton was merely referring to examples of situations where nomination races did not end as early as May. I don't see it as a big deal.

Drakef wrote:

Perhaps Clinton was merely referring to examples of situations where nomination races did not end as early as May. I don't see it as a big deal.

I'm guessing you aren't familiar with the Clinton's?..lol

I don't think she was suggesting that someone assassinate him. However the media has been ignoring her. For the desperate any attention is good attention. This isn't a fumbled how many states are there remark. I just don't think that brining a Kennedy's murder up while another Kennedy just got diagnosed with a terminal disease is a slip on the tongue.

I was referring to the recent tactic by the Obama campaign to take everything one of the other candidates says negatively and then decry the non-existent attack to get sympathy. He's doing it now and getting a pass...why wouldn't anyone think he'll be doing it in the general?

What, he's done it once? Big deal.

For example?
Its not as if its a new tactic never used by anyone else in this campaign or any other.

FEOS wrote:

Bush's comments at the Knesset. While ill-advised, they were not directed at Obama but his campaign acted as if they were and the media ran with it.

Hwo do you know they weren't directed at Obama?

ZombieVampire! wrote:

FEOS wrote:

Bush's comments at the Knesset. While ill-advised, they were not directed at Obama but his campaign acted as if they were and the media ran with it.

Hwo do you know they weren't directed at Obama?

Because Obama isn't the only one who's said those things. He isn't the only American, nor are Americans the only world citizens who have said those things.

That's how.

FEOS wrote:

ZombieVampire! wrote:

FEOS wrote:

Bush's comments at the Knesset. While ill-advised, they were not directed at Obama but his campaign acted as if they were and the media ran with it.

Hwo do you know they weren't directed at Obama?

Because Obama isn't the only one who's said those things. He isn't the only American, nor are Americans the only world citizens who have said those things.

That's how.

And how many of the others are prominent politicians currently engaged in election campaigns for an opposition party?

I admire Hillary's determination, but to use the RFK assasination of '68 as an example for campaigns that have gone into June is surely ill-advised, if not outright stupid.
Because even if she wasn't actually implying it, people will automatically assume that she is waiting for almost anything to happen that will carry her campaign into June, and lead her to the nomination.
In other words, this gave some people the impression that she is a heartless bitch.

To me, it is now more clear than ever that Hillary wants the presidency more for herself ( as a personal prize ), and not because she wants to serve her country and fellow americans.

I am not saying Obama is much different, mind you. Every career politician needs determination. But at least he seems to be more able to push that egoistic side in him aside and come across as being honest and "real". At least that's the impression that the internaitonal news media is conveying over here.

nukchebi0 wrote:

Why didn't Hitler surrender in January 1945, and save the lives of many of his people?

I'm sure saving the lives of people was the last thing on his mind..

Kmarion wrote:

FEOS wrote:

I was referring to the recent tactic by the Obama campaign to take everything one of the other candidates says negatively and then decry the non-existent attack to get sympathy. He's doing it now and getting a pass...why wouldn't anyone think he'll be doing it in the general?

It's simply pathetic.

Your spilling the same pathetic crap every conservative talk show host says about him. The irony is they attack him daily while at the same time saying he is "untouchable" in the media. How feeble minded does a person have to be to not see what is sitting right in front of them? Maybe he should start to cry for his sympathy.

Calm down there, KM. Are you going to stoop to the level of others here and assume you know how I'm going to vote?

How is Obama attacked daily (by other than conservative talk radio)? If you're talking about conservative talk radio, all the hosts I've heard since this started have attacked McCain as much as they attack Clinton or Obama. And please show how non-conservative media (ie, other than talk radio and Fox News) attack Obama? Even when they do a story with negative aspects (for him), it gets spun in such a way that he gets a pass.

Perhaps it's not Obama personally...he does seem to distance himself from it. But he doesn't admonish his campaign staff for making press releases either implying or outright stating that he is personally being attacked by someone's statements that had nothing to do with him.

FEOS wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

FEOS wrote:

I was referring to the recent tactic by the Obama campaign to take everything one of the other candidates says negatively and then decry the non-existent attack to get sympathy. He's doing it now and getting a pass...why wouldn't anyone think he'll be doing it in the general?

It's simply pathetic.

Your spilling the same pathetic crap every conservative talk show host says about him. The irony is they attack him daily while at the same time saying he is "untouchable" in the media. How feeble minded does a person have to be to not see what is sitting right in front of them? Maybe he should start to cry for his sympathy.

Calm down there, KM. Are you going to stoop to the level of others here and assume you know how I'm going to vote?

How is Obama attacked daily (by other than conservative talk radio)? If you're talking about conservative talk radio, all the hosts I've heard since this started have attacked McCain as much as they attack Clinton or Obama. And please show how non-conservative media (ie, other than talk radio and Fox News) attack Obama? Even when they do a story with negative aspects (for him), it gets spun in such a way that he gets a pass.

Perhaps it's not Obama personally...he does seem to distance himself from it. But he doesn't admonish his campaign staff for making press releases either implying or outright stating that he is personally being attacked by someone's statements that had nothing to do with him.

I never said a word about your vote, nor am I "not calm"..lol. I hear Glenn Beck, Sean Hanity, Rush, and others everyday take swipes at him. They mock him in terms of hope and change. They attack his inexperience and the people around him. He has addresed most of these issues head on. It's not just all victim politics. The attacks on McCain were there up until he was the presumptive nominee (by the right). Everything is spun by the opposite side of the aisle. This is nothing new. It's politics 101.