the point is how do the U.S know these milita's are not doing a runner after day 1 and giving the cash/arms to their own groups to fight U.S and other troops???FEOS wrote:
Supplying arms and training to the army and recognized militias of a sovereign nation is a far cry from supplying the guerillas trying to destabilize said nation. The US doesn't supply the insurgents they are fighting, but Iran does provide basic and advanced weaponry to the JAM and other Shi'a ILLEGAL militias.rammunition wrote:
Hezbollah only came about because of Israel's invasion and illegal occupation of Lebanon over 25 years ago. Hamas only came about because of Israel's illegal occupation of Gaza.Injustice breeds extremism. The US media tend to focus on the symptom, not the cause.M.O.A.B wrote:
It's the open supporter of Hamas and has been linked with infiltration missions into Iraq targetting coalition forces.
So no that doesn't make them supporters of "terrorists"
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/06/11/ … /strat.php
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/w … 413200.ece
Also America is arming militia groups in Iraq, how do they not know they run off with the money/guns back to Al Qaeda etc??? why do they blame Iran when they do the same???
and the U.S has the nerve to blame Iran for "supplying" weapons to insurgents when they do it themselves.
This thread suggests Iran has nuclear weapons. That's enough proof for me. Let's move, men!
[/sarcasm]
[/sarcasm]
if you read my reply on page one you will understand.M.O.A.B wrote:
Bit like suggesting the US and Israel were involved in the bombing in Iran eh?rammunition wrote:
"A senior Iraqi military official said the sophistication of the attack led him to believe it was the work of Iranian intelligence agents"M.O.A.B wrote:
No its not 'at times' its all the times, you don't accidentally fire rockets into a civilian area every single day multiple times a day
oh and here you go,
http://www.boston.com/news/world/middle … _soldiers/
there is a big difference between believing and evidence
You asked for evidence of my claim, I provided it.rammunition wrote:
if you read my reply on page one you will understand.M.O.A.B wrote:
Bit like suggesting the US and Israel were involved in the bombing in Iran eh?rammunition wrote:
"A senior Iraqi military official said the sophistication of the attack led him to believe it was the work of Iranian intelligence agents"
there is a big difference between believing and evidence
Men disguised as US troops, wearing brand new ACU uniforms, US weapons, US vehicles and speaking English, sounds a bit more upmarket and organised than your average Iraqi Militia.
We tend to keep track of those kinds of things (serial numbers and such) and examine what the bad guys were using in a fight after it's all over. Most of the insurgents' use of US stuff is based on what they have scavenged from the battlefield, not what's been issued to registered militia.rammunition wrote:
the point is how do the U.S know these milita's are not doing a runner after day 1 and giving the cash/arms to their own groups to fight U.S and other troops???FEOS wrote:
Supplying arms and training to the army and recognized militias of a sovereign nation is a far cry from supplying the guerillas trying to destabilize said nation. The US doesn't supply the insurgents they are fighting, but Iran does provide basic and advanced weaponry to the JAM and other Shi'a ILLEGAL militias.rammunition wrote:
Hezbollah only came about because of Israel's invasion and illegal occupation of Lebanon over 25 years ago. Hamas only came about because of Israel's illegal occupation of Gaza.Injustice breeds extremism. The US media tend to focus on the symptom, not the cause.
So no that doesn't make them supporters of "terrorists"
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/06/11/ … /strat.php
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/w … 413200.ece
Also America is arming militia groups in Iraq, how do they not know they run off with the money/guns back to Al Qaeda etc??? why do they blame Iran when they do the same???
and the U.S has the nerve to blame Iran for "supplying" weapons to insurgents when they do it themselves.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Such a dumbass! Nuke's should be used as clean up after you've wiped out an entire populace!
About the same amount of evidence Clinton needed to bomb Iraq.DesertFox- wrote:
This thread suggests Iran has nuclear weapons. That's enough proof for me. Let's move, men!
[/sarcasm]
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Nobody should nuke anybody,
If you disagee with this statementm then you're a communanzailiberalconservativaz....yea, you probably suck. Its not guranteed but yeah...go fig.
If you disagee with this statementm then you're a communanzailiberalconservativaz....yea, you probably suck. Its not guranteed but yeah...go fig.
this thread made my day.
QFT!Pug wrote:
this thread made my day.
good, maybe then it will teach and America a fucking lesson.
"you know life is what we make it, and a chance is like a picture, it'd be nice if you just take it"
I thought the op was the handicapable poster of the day... we may have a tie... back under your rock...d4rkst4r wrote:
good, maybe then it will teach and America a fucking lesson.
Iran doesn't have a nuke and we should make sure they never do...
Love is the answer
Haha good luck with that. So tell me Catbox, is George Bush's cock 2 or 3 inches long??[TUF]Catbox wrote:
I thought the op was the handicapable poster of the day... we may have a tie... back under your rock...d4rkst4r wrote:
good, maybe then it will teach and America a fucking lesson.
Iran doesn't have a nuke and we should make sure they never do...
"you know life is what we make it, and a chance is like a picture, it'd be nice if you just take it"
har hard4rkst4r wrote:
Haha good luck with that. So tell me Catbox, is George Bush's cock 2 or 3 inches long??
You showed him!
My sentiments exactly.Parker wrote:
QFT!Pug wrote:
this thread made my day.
Yeah it was getting boring around here. This guy needs to make more threads.Parker wrote:
QFT!Pug wrote:
this thread made my day.
Because that is a sure form of suicide. Iran; relatively small country with (maybe) a few nukes. Perhaps they might be able to put a few nukes into America.rammunition wrote:
Along With Israel
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080523/wl … 0523174601
If someone with Iranian links bombed a church in America, i would bet the U.S would do some strikes on Iran, so why should Iran not now nuke the virus, that is America,???
America; really big country with a lot of nukes. The US could carpet Iran well enough that you could put the survivors in a single football stadium.
And welcom back, ram. Can't wait to see how long until you are banned again.
Actually, it probably be closer to two stadiums, but yeah.
could be U.S trained Iraqi militia. English isn't exactly what the Iranians would be teachingM.O.A.B wrote:
You asked for evidence of my claim, I provided it.rammunition wrote:
if you read my reply on page one you will understand.M.O.A.B wrote:
Bit like suggesting the US and Israel were involved in the bombing in Iran eh?
Men disguised as US troops, wearing brand new ACU uniforms, US weapons, US vehicles and speaking English, sounds a bit more upmarket and organised than your average Iraqi Militia.
Of course they wouldn't train them in English if they wanted them to pass as Americans...that would just be silly.rammunition wrote:
could be U.S trained Iraqi militia. English isn't exactly what the Iranians would be teachingM.O.A.B wrote:
You asked for evidence of my claim, I provided it.rammunition wrote:
if you read my reply on page one you will understand.
Men disguised as US troops, wearing brand new ACU uniforms, US weapons, US vehicles and speaking English, sounds a bit more upmarket and organised than your average Iraqi Militia.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
ya, that was already covered:rammunition wrote:
could be U.S trained Iraqi militia. English isn't exactly what the Iranians would be teachingM.O.A.B wrote:
You asked for evidence of my claim, I provided it.rammunition wrote:
if you read my reply on page one you will understand.
Men disguised as US troops, wearing brand new ACU uniforms, US weapons, US vehicles and speaking English, sounds a bit more upmarket and organised than your average Iraqi Militia.
FEOS wrote:
We tend to keep track of those kinds of things (serial numbers and such) and examine what the bad guys were using in a fight after it's all over. Most of the insurgents' use of US stuff is based on what they have scavenged from the battlefield, not what's been issued to registered militia.
Fuck Iran, fuck the USA, GWB and I'm-mad-in-a-jar should just drink 20 shots and settle it, Pussies.
You know when I posted that I knew someone would quote me and call "Irony".The Sheriff wrote:
Irony.topthrill05 wrote:
Your simply an idiot.
This does not justify war. This just proves that our complaints of Iran aiding terrorists are hypocritical.rammunition wrote:
Along With Israel
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080523/wl … 0523174601
If someone with Iranian links bombed a church in America, i would bet the U.S would do some strikes on Iran, so why should Iran not now nuke the virus, that is America,???
Indeed, I think hes playing on how, in the rest of the world, it is almost fashionable to hate America. Atleast from my experience it is. Go anywhere in europe and say ''and those dam Americans'' and someone is bound to agree with you.NantanCochise wrote:
This thread is FAIL big time.
There just ignorant, I wouldnt worry about it
Martyn
See we've told you numerous times that most Americans dissaprove of Bush. The people who did actually vote for him, have lost faith in him. Most people dissaprove of the war. We still support out troops on the fact that people know the troops THEMSELVES did not choose to go to Iraq. They were ordered to go.rammunition wrote:
so why should Iran not now nuke the virus, that is America,???
Yet you call for the nuking of men women and children in the U.S. due to a damn near rogue leader who many people push for impeachment, and tried for war crimes. yet all of America is a virus?
I think the war was a big mistake, I think the President is a criminal. Many people share the same disposition.
Yet you stick America as a whole as a "terrorist nation". So fuck off with your generalizing, and fuck you for for your ingorant "kill americans" comments.
Why don't you try to actually debate, listen to what some americans have to say. It's ignorant people like you that cause more problems than help any situation.
Obviously, rammunition, you won't acknowledge this post, as you have ignored any reasonable response in the past.
Last edited by RoosterCantrell (2008-05-24 12:03:12)