FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6834|'Murka

PureFodder wrote:

FEOS wrote:

I fully realize that patients are seen according to the severity of their presentation, not the order they arrived (did you miss the part where I said I've been to the ER with my son innumerable times?). The point being that regardless of how they are prioritized, those non-emergent cases are taking up resources and cost (keep in mind we're talking about basically non-paying patients here) in the ER rather than waiting a day or so to see their GP.

I'm talking about what it's like in US ERs. I won't comment on ERs (or A&E depts) in the UK since I haven't been through one, nor will I pretend to be an expert on the UK medical system in general since I neither live there nor work in your medical system.
If they wait a couple of days and see a GP, are they not going to incur similar costs and resources then. If they're only seen when there is no serious problems to take care of, therefore only increasing wait times to similarly low level injuries and the government will be carrying the costs whether they see a GP or go to an ER, what's the big issue? It should neither incovenience you or cost the ER anything.

In fact, without them, wouldn't there be times when the ER staff lack critical patients and are therefore wasting time and resourced doing bugger all, when they could be seeing to some low level injuries while they wait for the next major one?
Perhaps I wasn't clear enough.

Going to see the GP doesn't pull resources away from the ER staff or facility. Pulling resources away from a GP is less critical than pulling them away from an ER.

And believe me, wading through a sea of people without emergent conditions in order to get your son who is in respiratory distress into the ER (and clear up the triage area so he can be seen) is quite inconvenient.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
S.Lythberg
Mastermind
+429|6870|Chicago, IL
lol

free health care for 310 million people?

I like my money to go to my bank account, not the federal coffers...
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6828|North Carolina
With the current healthcare system, less of your money might go to the government, but a lot more of it will continue getting sucked up by corporations -- mostly insurance agencies.

Given the choice between fattening the wallet of an insurance company and sending some of my money to the government, I'll go with the government anyday.  Insurance CEOs don't have to worry about getting elected.
Schittloaf
not fulla schit
+23|6326|MN
just post a sign at the window saying  " haga que más dinero en Europa por favor mueve su mierda allí" or " aceptamos solamente moneda americana vamos a casa asshole"

Last edited by Schittloaf (2008-05-27 21:13:05)

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard