Valid targets, they are employed in the espionage of other countries which in my mind makes them a legitimate targetParker wrote:
thats a tricky one.....if you were going to start a war with someone, the embassy would be a great place to start.sergeriver wrote:
I don't know if an embassy qualifies as a military target.ZombieVampire! wrote:
My personal view regards the target: it allows things like military collateral damage to be excluded (which prevents everyone from becoming a terrorist).
after all, a lot of the people that are in there are spooks anyway.
which leads me to ask a new question:
are cia employees valid targets, or do they count as civilians?
Im a terrorist?Nappy wrote:
good on them. i see nothing wrong with labelling cia and the us army terrorists.
how would you feel if you got invaded
youre a waste of a fertilized egg.