i think we can pretty certain the suns lifespan of 5 billion years will outlive the human race. So for our purposes its infinite.Roc18 wrote:
I doubt it would be infinite because the sun will die one day.
Unless we become so technologically advanced that we will be able to either live in space without the sun or colonize a whole other planet in another solar system with a good sun.m3thod wrote:
i think we can pretty certain the suns lifespan of 5 billion years will outlive the human race. So for our purposes its infinite.Roc18 wrote:
I doubt it would be infinite because the sun will die one day.
You know i had to read that three times....then i started lol'ing my ass off.Roc18 wrote:
Unless we become so technologically advanced that we will be able to either live in space without the sun or colonize a whole other planet in another solar system with a good sun.m3thod wrote:
i think we can pretty certain the suns lifespan of 5 billion years will outlive the human race. So for our purposes its infinite.Roc18 wrote:
I doubt it would be infinite because the sun will die one day.
So 1 mole of hydrogen would do use good for 6 seconds. Sounds reasonable.SenorToenails wrote:
In 2005, the world used on the order of 1020J. If the entire mass of the hydrogen atom (1 proton + 1 electron) were converted into energy with 100% efficiency, the energy is only ~940 MeV, or ~10-10J. It could power the world, but only for ~10-23 seconds.paul386 wrote:
1 atom of hydrogen contains enough energy to power the world by the way.
For some reason you sound pretty dumb. Do you even know what a particular acceleration does?unnamednewbie13 wrote:
For some reason, particle acceleration experiments on the only planet we have sounds a dozen kinds of dumb.
I was rendered speechless.m3thod wrote:
You know i had to read that three times....then i started lol'ing my ass off.
lol I just felt like writing that.too_money2007 wrote:
Wow, great arguement there Roc18. lulz
