Venus isn't exactly an oil paintingStingray24 wrote:
Glad to see Venus beat her ogre of a sister Serena.
Well done to Laura Robson though!! Just hope the English media don't put the usual amount of hype and pressure on the poor kid!!
Venus isn't exactly an oil paintingStingray24 wrote:
Glad to see Venus beat her ogre of a sister Serena.
no, you are spot on for oncem3thod wrote:
They're both ogres. Or am i missing something....Stingray24 wrote:
Glad to see Venus beat her ogre of a sister Serena.
lawlz...why the fuck would you even watch?KILLSWITCH wrote:
It's quite disturbing watching the Venus Brothers grunt at each other for a couple of hours.
Eye-GiZzLe wrote:
thread needs more sharapova tbh
http://img.metro.co.uk/i/pix/2007/08/sh … 50x646.jpg
Pisses me off how they only grunt on the big points, its blaitently intended to put the opposition offKILLSWITCH wrote:
It's quite disturbing watching the Venus Brothers grunt at each other for a couple of hours.
You may not use more than 10 karma points in 24 hours.kptk92 wrote:
http://www.funnybeez.com/funnypictures/ … banana.jpgEye-GiZzLe wrote:
thread needs more sharapova tbh
http://img.metro.co.uk/i/pix/2007/08/sh … 50x646.jpg
kewl me tooEye-GiZzLe wrote:
You may not use more than 10 karma points in 24 hours.kptk92 wrote:
http://www.funnybeez.com/funnypictures/ … banana.jpgEye-GiZzLe wrote:
thread needs more sharapova tbh
http://img.metro.co.uk/i/pix/2007/08/sh … 50x646.jpg
i'll do it for youEye-GiZzLe wrote:
You may not use more than 10 karma points in 24 hours.kptk92 wrote:
http://www.funnybeez.com/funnypictures/ … banana.jpgEye-GiZzLe wrote:
thread needs more sharapova tbh
http://img.metro.co.uk/i/pix/2007/08/sh … 50x646.jpg
I was in the pub ... and with the football season finished, thats all they had on the TV.usmarine2 wrote:
lawlz...why the fuck would you even watch?KILLSWITCH wrote:
It's quite disturbing watching the Venus Brothers grunt at each other for a couple of hours.
good deal thanks.:ronin:.|Patton wrote:
i'll do it for youEye-GiZzLe wrote:
You may not use more than 10 karma points in 24 hours.
Cool i didnt know venus was both her first and last nameKILLSWITCH wrote:
It's quite disturbing watching the Venus Brothers grunt at each other for a couple of hours.
Nice, this time lets keep the weed away from the kids.kptk92 wrote:
Congratz to Venus, unlucky Serena. Was a good game!
But... WE GOT A BRITON WINNING WIMBLEDON!! And she is only 14 years of age!!
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QygpnCI_Lik[/yutube]
Federer to win tomorrow, I don't like Nadal.
Ya, when she was busted. Read up.Zimmer wrote:
That girl looks at least 20.
kptk doesn't like Nadal; well that is new, because most people love him. Don't know the reason you don't like him for, but it must be good
Ivanovic > Sharapova
http://bp2.blogger.com/_lbLJlafTPgU/R-v … novic2.jpg
n 1989, Capriati became the youngest player to win the French Open junior singles title at the age of 13 years and 2 months. (The record stood until 1993, when Martina Hingis won the title as a 12-year-old.) She then went on to win the junior singles title at the 1989 U.S. Open and the junior doubles titles at both the U.S. Open and Wimbledon, partnering with Meredith McGrath. On September 14, 1989, she became the youngest ever Wightman Cup player,[1] playing against Clare Wood, and the first player for four years to win a Wightman Cup match 6–0, 6–0.[2]
On March 5, 1990, three weeks before her 14th birthday, she became a professional tennis player. In her debut tournament at Boca Raton, Florida, she defeated four seeded players while becoming the youngest-ever player to reach a tour final, where she lost 6–4, 7–5 to Gabriela Sabatini. Despite the loss, her debut was on the cover of Sports Illustrated the following week. Three months later, she became the youngest-ever semifinalist at the French Open (aged 14 years and 2 months), where she lost to the eventual champion, Monica Seles. She then reached the fourth round at both Wimbledon and the U.S. Open that year and won her first professional singles title in October at San Juan, Puerto Rico. She finished the year ranked eighth in the world.
lulz"the poster child for burned-out sports prodigies,"
If she screams in bed like she does on the court you definitely know she isn't faking it.
Why do you attack people when their opinion differs from yours? It's not really necessary..Zimmer wrote:
Hahahaha, that comment shows precisely how little you know about tennis.Mint Sauce wrote:
Federer will win. He was near perfect against Ancic today. If Nadal wants to get close to Federer, he has to improve the speed of his serve, most good players can just destroy it, so he is lucky he is a very good recovery player.
Bennisboy clearly pointed your bullshit.
Most good players can destroy it? He has dropped 2 sets in the WHOLE tournament. Murray couldn't break his serve, Gulbis couldn't, Djokovic couldn't ( Queens ) , Kiefer couldn't.... I have no idea where you came out with such bullshit, but you clearly aren't watching the tennis.
And again, your bullshit about Gulbis.... Nadal was lucky to win?! He lost first set and then beat him straight out. You have no idea what you are talking about, because even though Nadals serve is a clay serve; it works incredibly well on grass and even the commentators said so. His game against Gulbis was not the best - but then he proceeds to improve his game and wipe the floor with both Kiefer and Murray in straight sets. His serves against Gulbis were not the best, but did you even watch the last 2 matches? IF the player did return it, Nadal just powered it across court and won the point. I think Murray took 7 points off Nadals serve in the WHOLE game. I have no idea where you are coming up with these facts; but you clearly have something against him.
Since when the fuck have you been a tennis expert? Every single commentator and ex-tennis champ on the wimbledon TV has been commenting on the effectiveness of Nadals spin and the amazing power and accuracy he gets on them. How about you go out and tell him that? You seem so sure of yourself.
Federer is really murdering his serve isn't he mint?Mint Sauce wrote:
Why do you attack people when their opinion differs from yours? It's not really necessary..Zimmer wrote:
Hahahaha, that comment shows precisely how little you know about tennis.Mint Sauce wrote:
Federer will win. He was near perfect against Ancic today. If Nadal wants to get close to Federer, he has to improve the speed of his serve, most good players can just destroy it, so he is lucky he is a very good recovery player.
Bennisboy clearly pointed your bullshit.
Most good players can destroy it? He has dropped 2 sets in the WHOLE tournament. Murray couldn't break his serve, Gulbis couldn't, Djokovic couldn't ( Queens ) , Kiefer couldn't.... I have no idea where you came out with such bullshit, but you clearly aren't watching the tennis.
And again, your bullshit about Gulbis.... Nadal was lucky to win?! He lost first set and then beat him straight out. You have no idea what you are talking about, because even though Nadals serve is a clay serve; it works incredibly well on grass and even the commentators said so. His game against Gulbis was not the best - but then he proceeds to improve his game and wipe the floor with both Kiefer and Murray in straight sets. His serves against Gulbis were not the best, but did you even watch the last 2 matches? IF the player did return it, Nadal just powered it across court and won the point. I think Murray took 7 points off Nadals serve in the WHOLE game. I have no idea where you are coming up with these facts; but you clearly have something against him.
Since when the fuck have you been a tennis expert? Every single commentator and ex-tennis champ on the wimbledon TV has been commenting on the effectiveness of Nadals spin and the amazing power and accuracy he gets on them. How about you go out and tell him that? You seem so sure of yourself.
Shows how little I know about Tennis? Are you serious? I've played this game for 13 years now, and i'm at county - national level, so shut the fuck up. Gulbis did actually break his serve, I know this because I was THERE. And yes, most players can murder the serve back, including Gulbis, and if you had read what I had said afterwards instead of letting the red mist descend, you would have realised I said that he IS A VERY GOOD RECOVERY PLAYER, and can get the shot back.. I never said the serve doesn't work on grass, just that he needs to improve it to beat Federer..
And I don't have anything against Nadal, having met him and all, you fucking boon.
omg..
Last edited by kptk92 (2008-07-06 11:27:38)