Insufferable dolt. What is the point?rammunition wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7494996.stm
Bye bye Europe
you're right. I let my emotions get the best of me. My apologies to that Iranian guy, Iam sure he hasn't had a decent intercourse in months.m3thod wrote:
B.Schuss wrote:
standing up to someone with words means nothing. that's just rethoric. We know it. He knows it.
I don't give a damn. Give me a call when the bullets fly. I am tired of Iran, and the media reporting every single bullshit word from every towel wearing sheepshagger...
My head aches...
I once called albanians a nation of goat fuckers and i got awm'ed for racism!
And since I didn't put a specific ethnic group down, I am not a racist.
The guy who was quoted in the article isn't even a member of the iranian government. He is some aide to the religious and spiritual leader of that nation. Wether that means he actually has real power over there I don't know, but this just seemed to me to be one of those stories which newspapers or news services use to fill the blanks when there is really nothing of importance going on, or in a case where they look to increase sales or clicks.
I guess I am just tired of the constant reporting, when there is really nothing to report.
lulz
If you honestly , sincerely believe the bases of that video..... well lulz. you think this man is the driving force of total world dominance?

I present to you the Founder and board member of PNAC, or Project for the New American Century. Bill Kristol
Ill admit the video you posted is compelling and has some great graphics, but call me discerning, because it will only be believed buy people that want to believe that the US is evil and we want to take over the world. I think it must be embarrassing that you think we want to and will attack the UK the EU and every other nation on this rock we call earth.
Your dumber than you lead us to believe, rammnuter.
If you honestly , sincerely believe the bases of that video..... well lulz. you think this man is the driving force of total world dominance?

I present to you the Founder and board member of PNAC, or Project for the New American Century. Bill Kristol
Ill admit the video you posted is compelling and has some great graphics, but call me discerning, because it will only be believed buy people that want to believe that the US is evil and we want to take over the world. I think it must be embarrassing that you think we want to and will attack the UK the EU and every other nation on this rock we call earth.
Your dumber than you lead us to believe, rammnuter.
try to focus daniel san, you post to much, you stay on a topic, now wax zhe floor!rammunition wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7494996.stm
Bye bye Europe
You are a moron.
If America collapses into a "3rd world country", do you understand the knock on effects?
And yes it's very good of Iran to actually have some bollocks, but none-the-less, you're turning into somewhat of a radical.
If America collapses into a "3rd world country", do you understand the knock on effects?
And yes it's very good of Iran to actually have some bollocks, but none-the-less, you're turning into somewhat of a radical.
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
send some tomahawks to derbyshire
lolkidislol
the fact that so many regulars on this forum give rammunition the time of day is just as bad as the shit he spews.
Nothing is as bad as the shit he spews. Except fom maybe womens basketball.God Save the Queen wrote:
the fact that so many regulars on this forum give rammunition the time of day is just as bad as the shit he spews.
Malloy must go
QFTGod Save the Queen wrote:
send some tomahawks to derbyshire
and lol at that video, the fighting in Iraq is because of opposition to American dominance of the world?
I guess we're the Macedonia of today eh
too many people are actually taking the time to answer this kid seriously. thats giving validation to the shit he says.deeznutz1245 wrote:
Nothing is as bad as the shit he spews. Except fom maybe womens basketball.God Save the Queen wrote:
the fact that so many regulars on this forum give rammunition the time of day is just as bad as the shit he spews.
This second page is
So are you saying that the worse thing in the world, intellectually speaking, would be to have a conversation with Rammunition while attending a women's basketball game?God Save the Queen wrote:
too many people are actually taking the time to answer this kid seriously. thats giving validation to the shit he says.deeznutz1245 wrote:
Nothing is as bad as the shit he spews. Except fom maybe womens basketball.God Save the Queen wrote:
the fact that so many regulars on this forum give rammunition the time of day is just as bad as the shit he spews.
Malloy must go
in argentinadeeznutz1245 wrote:
So are you saying that the worse thing in the world, intellectually speaking, would be to have a conversation with Rammunition while attending a women's basketball game?God Save the Queen wrote:
too many people are actually taking the time to answer this kid seriously. thats giving validation to the shit he says.deeznutz1245 wrote:
Nothing is as bad as the shit he spews. Except fom maybe womens basketball.
lulzGod Save the Queen wrote:
in argentina
Malloy must go
Parker wrote:
moar liek in an argentine septic tank amirite?God Save the Queen wrote:
in argentinadeeznutz1245 wrote:
So are you saying that the worse thing in the world, intellectually speaking, would be to have a conversation with Rammunition while attending a women's basketball game?God Save the Queen wrote:
too many people are actually taking the time to answer this kid seriously. thats giving validation to the shit he says.
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?pi … 8#p2032818THE_EYE wrote:
moar liek in an argentine septic tank amirite?God Save the Queen wrote:
in argentinadeeznutz1245 wrote:
So are you saying that the worse thing in the world, intellectually speaking, would be to have a conversation with Rammunition while attending a women's basketball game?
Fairly stupid and unnecessary of a news article. Of course Iran would be able to attack EITHER the United States or Israel (presuming either of those nations are responsible for the attack), but not both unless both participate. If so, you have one justifiable attack and then another not so much.rammunition wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7494961.stm
Iran will strike Israel and the US navy in the Gulf if it is attacked over its nuclear programme, a senior Iranian official has warned.
"The first US shot on Iran would set the United States' vital interests in the world on fire," said Ali Shirazi, an aide to Iran's supreme leader.
"Tel Aviv and the US fleet in the Persian Gulf would be the targets that would be set on fire," he said.
Iran are noobs when it comes to war. I mean cmon, they revived WWI with their Iran-Iraq war.DesertFox- wrote:
Fairly stupid and unnecessary of a news article. Of course Iran would be able to attack EITHER the United States or Israel (presuming either of those nations are responsible for the attack), but not both unless both participate. If so, you have one justifiable attack and then another not so much.rammunition wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7494961.stm
Iran will strike Israel and the US navy in the Gulf if it is attacked over its nuclear programme, a senior Iranian official has warned.
"The first US shot on Iran would set the United States' vital interests in the world on fire," said Ali Shirazi, an aide to Iran's supreme leader.
"Tel Aviv and the US fleet in the Persian Gulf would be the targets that would be set on fire," he said.
But if Israel is attacked even in retaliation we will be brought in. I may come off as an idiot but we will be in Iran before Bush is out of office.DesertFox- wrote:
Fairly stupid and unnecessary of a news article. Of course Iran would be able to attack EITHER the United States or Israel (presuming either of those nations are responsible for the attack), but not both unless both participate. If so, you have one justifiable attack and then another not so much.rammunition wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7494961.stm
Iran will strike Israel and the US navy in the Gulf if it is attacked over its nuclear programme, a senior Iranian official has warned.
"The first US shot on Iran would set the United States' vital interests in the world on fire," said Ali Shirazi, an aide to Iran's supreme leader.
"Tel Aviv and the US fleet in the Persian Gulf would be the targets that would be set on fire," he said.
I say this after seeing Bush answer questions about Iran before his G8 meeting. Look it up and enjoy a healthy *FacePalm*.
Now Ram you have to understand that a solid 70% of Americans cannot stand what is happening to our country and disagree with a war with Iran, but other then a complete revolt nothing is going to change. Most of these 70% of Americans think Obama is the solution and depending on what happens in these next 4-5 months the hole might just be to deep for him to make much of a difference.
They don't care whether the attack is justifiable or not. They hate both us and Israel and are looking for any excuse to start a fight. Ahmadinejad is dying (damn, I'm funny) to be a martyr, that's why he's such a threat.DesertFox- wrote:
Fairly stupid and unnecessary of a news article. Of course Iran would be able to attack EITHER the United States or Israel (presuming either of those nations are responsible for the attack), but not both unless both participate. If so, you have one justifiable attack and then another not so much.rammunition wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7494961.stm
Iran will strike Israel and the US navy in the Gulf if it is attacked over its nuclear programme, a senior Iranian official has warned.
"The first US shot on Iran would set the United States' vital interests in the world on fire," said Ali Shirazi, an aide to Iran's supreme leader.
"Tel Aviv and the US fleet in the Persian Gulf would be the targets that would be set on fire," he said.