Ahmedinejad is not looking for a fight. He's not an idiot you know. He knows his country don't have the military might to take on either the US or Israel. He is talking big because Israel have been doing military maneouvres in the Mediterranean. Don't let the hype get to you. He ain't ready to strap on a suicide belt any millennium soon. All he's saying is that he'd basically lob a load of missiles at Tel Aviv IF IRAN GOT ATTACKED.chittydog wrote:
They don't care whether the attack is justifiable or not. They hate both us and Israel and are looking for any excuse to start a fight. Ahmadinejad is dying (damn, I'm funny) to be a martyr, that's why he's such a threat.
Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-07-08 09:47:56)
But he should be saying he'd lob a load of missiles at Tel Aviv if Iran got attacked by Israel.CameronPoe wrote:
Ahmedinejad is not looking for a fight. He's not an idiot you know. He knows his country don't have the military might to take on either the US or Israel. He is talking big because Israel have been doing military maneouvres in the Mediterranean. Don't let the hype get to you. He ain't ready to strap on a suicide belt any millennium soon. All he's saying is that he'd basically lob a load of missiles at Tel Aviv IF IRAN GOT ATTACKED.chittydog wrote:
They don't care whether the attack is justifiable or not. They hate both us and Israel and are looking for any excuse to start a fight. Ahmadinejad is dying (damn, I'm funny) to be a martyr, that's why he's such a threat.
You underestimate the power of Iran's missiles.S.Lythberg wrote:
Isn't this the same shit Saddam spewed right before A-10 Thunderbolts reduced his tank armies to molten puddles?
You overestimate the effectiveness of 70's era soviet surplus weaponry...
of course...AutralianChainsaw wrote:
You underestimate the power of Iran's missiles.S.Lythberg wrote:
Isn't this the same shit Saddam spewed right before A-10 Thunderbolts reduced his tank armies to molten puddles?
You overestimate the effectiveness of 70's era soviet surplus weaponry...
Those a not a bunch of scud like saddam had.. they are accurate and deadly.
Your fleets are sitting ducks in the Persian Gulf... and your leadership knows it.
Why do you think you didnt attack yet?
You are forgetting about our own missile defense systems that are on our ships.AutralianChainsaw wrote:
You underestimate the power of Iran's missiles.S.Lythberg wrote:
Isn't this the same shit Saddam spewed right before A-10 Thunderbolts reduced his tank armies to molten puddles?
You overestimate the effectiveness of 70's era soviet surplus weaponry...
Those a not a bunch of scud like saddam had.. they are accurate and deadly.
Your fleets are sitting ducks in the Persian Gulf... and your leadership knows it.
Why do you think you didnt attack yet?
AutralianChainsaw wrote:
You underestimate the power of Iran's missiles.S.Lythberg wrote:
Isn't this the same shit Saddam spewed right before A-10 Thunderbolts reduced his tank armies to molten puddles?
You overestimate the effectiveness of 70's era soviet surplus weaponry...
Those a not a bunch of scud like saddam had.. they are accurate and deadly.
Your fleets are sitting ducks in the Persian Gulf... and your leadership knows it.
Why do you think you didnt attack yet?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chickenhawk_(politics)fadedsteve wrote:
Iran has NO IDEA who they are fucking with. . . . . Its time they get smoked!
Beat me to it Sir.ATG wrote:
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship … -label.jpgAutralianChainsaw wrote:
You underestimate the power of Iran's missiles.S.Lythberg wrote:
Isn't this the same shit Saddam spewed right before A-10 Thunderbolts reduced his tank armies to molten puddles?
You overestimate the effectiveness of 70's era soviet surplus weaponry...
Those a not a bunch of scud like saddam had.. they are accurate and deadly.
Your fleets are sitting ducks in the Persian Gulf... and your leadership knows it.
Why do you think you didnt attack yet?
Lol.fadedsteve wrote:
Iran has NO IDEA who they are fucking with. . . . . Its time they get smoked!
Can you blame them when the US army is on their western and eastern borders?God Save the Queen wrote:
Iran is just as guilty of doing multiple military excercises within the last couple of years as messages to the US.
Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-07-09 01:53:14)
You OVERestimate the power of Iran's missiles.AutralianChainsaw wrote:
You underestimate the power of Iran's missiles.S.Lythberg wrote:
Isn't this the same shit Saddam spewed right before A-10 Thunderbolts reduced his tank armies to molten puddles?
You overestimate the effectiveness of 70's era soviet surplus weaponry...
Those a not a bunch of scud like saddam had.. they are accurate and deadly.
Your fleets are sitting ducks in the Persian Gulf... and your leadership knows it.
Why do you think you didnt attack yet?
Last edited by FEOS (2008-07-09 02:12:51)
More accurate and complete now.B.Schuss wrote:
And he must know that the israelis, French, Brits, Germans, and Americans are never going to stand for that.
Last edited by FEOS (2008-07-09 03:16:40)
I don't think the French, Brits or Germans have any appetite for military action. As such, they will 'stand for that'.FEOS wrote:
More accurate and complete now.B.Schuss wrote:
And he must know that the israelis, French, Brits, Germans, and Americans are never going to stand for that.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle … 496765.stmFEOS wrote:
You OVERestimate the power of Iran's missiles.AutralianChainsaw wrote:
You underestimate the power of Iran's missiles.S.Lythberg wrote:
Isn't this the same shit Saddam spewed right before A-10 Thunderbolts reduced his tank armies to molten puddles?
You overestimate the effectiveness of 70's era soviet surplus weaponry...
Those a not a bunch of scud like saddam had.. they are accurate and deadly.
Your fleets are sitting ducks in the Persian Gulf... and your leadership knows it.
Why do you think you didnt attack yet?
They are basically Iran's version of the al-Hussein...a pimped-out Scud produced indigenously. Neither accurate nor deadly...unless you happen to be where it randomly lands (kind of like getting struck by lightning)
The PG isn't exactly a small place...it's not like those ships can't maneuver...or defend themselves.
Why haven't we attacked yet? Because diplomacy is still being attempted.
Last edited by rammunition (2008-07-09 03:28:12)
I guess that would depend on the particular situation. if the legal situation around Iran's use of nuclear technology remains the same though, I don't know how military action against Iran could be justified.CameronPoe wrote:
I don't think the French, Brits or Germans have any appetite for military action. As such, they will 'stand for that'.FEOS wrote:
More accurate and complete now.B.Schuss wrote:
And he must know that the israelis, French, Brits, Germans, and Americans are never going to stand for that.
i wouldn't put it past them.FEOS wrote:
And the US has mind-reading death rays.
See how bullshit propaganda works?
What about sharks with fricking laser beams on their heads?FEOS wrote:
And the US has mind-reading death rays.
See how bullshit propaganda works?
To be fair, the US did research the mind reading stuff to (presumably) no success.FEOS wrote:
And the US has mind-reading death rays.
See how bullshit propaganda works?
