BF2S Forums Hoorah France!

Dilbert_X wrote:

And their food is equally terrible.

Obviously never been to France.

From what I hear from friends who've been to France, they're all fucking elitist dicks there anyways.

Everything they do has to be better than everyone (Texas ideology I guess).

Their food has to be better
Their personalities have to be better
Their women's armpit hair has to be longer

etc

Never been myself, although I plan to one day eventually to visit Normandy.

The Sheriff wrote:

Their women are fit as fuck aswell.

Lies

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article … s-fat.html

The Sheriff wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

The Sheriff wrote:

Their women are fit as fuck aswell.

Lies

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article … s-fat.html

Seriously, these two girls I met last week were banging and they spoke English aswell.

I could meet two really hot English women and you could meet two really hot American women (and there are plenty of both) but that wouldn't change the fact that a good portion of the population is fat.

The Sheriff wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

The Sheriff wrote:

Seriously, these two girls I met last week were banging and they spoke English aswell.

I could meet two really hot English women and you could meet two really hot American women (and there are plenty of both) but that wouldn't change the fact that a good portion of the population is fat.

Lies maybe two hot Welsh women, you won't find any fit English girls, fact.

...Fair enough. Never been to either place. :S

ZombieVampire! wrote:

lowing wrote:

Also if they do not wanna let their enemies "walk in", and expect help to prevent it, maybe they could lend a hand when someone else needs a taste of the freedoms that they enjoy, that others fought and died for.

And I'm sure if they were threatened, they would.  Same as the US.

You lost me in that reponse completely

That is ok though, French history speaks for itself. There is little to debate about it

Last edited by lowing (2008-07-13 06:25:38)

ZombieVampire! wrote:

If France saw benefit to France in fighting for someone else's freedom, they'd do so.

If the US saw benefit to the US in fighting for someone else's freedom, they'd do so.

Well apparently France sees MORE benefit in surrendering and waiting for someone else to come do their fighting,  so whatcha say really isn't all that true. Especially since the European countryside is home to so many American cemetaries in now free countries

TheAussieReaper wrote:

lowing wrote:

ZombieVampire! wrote:

If France saw benefit to France in fighting for someone else's freedom, they'd do so.

If the US saw benefit to the US in fighting for someone else's freedom, they'd do so.

Well apparently France sees MORE benefit in surrendering and waiting for someone else to come do their fighting,  so whatcha say really isn't all that true. Especially since the European countryside is home to so many American cemetaries in now free countries

Without looking it up, lowing, can you tell us all who you think built the Statue of Liberty?

And then tell us why they built it.

Yup.... I sure can

And the point being? You mean while they build statues everyone else fights??

also don't gimme that bullshit about France and the American Revolution. France wanted nothing to do with it, UNTIL the colonies did all the leg work and proved the war could be won. Then and only then did France show up to share in the victory. AND THAT was only done to send a big FU to England. Frances biggest enemy.

lowing wrote:

also don't gimme that bullshit about France and the American Revolution. France wanted nothing to do with it, UNTIL the colonies did all the leg work and proved the war could be won. Then and only then did France show up to share in the victory. AND THAT was only done to send a big FU to England. Frances biggest enemy.

Oh I see. So when France is allied with you, it's only to share in your victory. But when they don't fight in Iraq it's because they don't want to share in your defeat?

TheAussieReaper wrote:

lowing wrote:

also don't gimme that bullshit about France and the American Revolution. France wanted nothing to do with it, UNTIL the colonies did all the leg work and proved the war could be won. Then and only then did France show up to share in the victory. AND THAT was only done to send a big FU to England. Frances biggest enemy.

Oh I see. So when France is allied with you, it's only to share in your victory. But when they don't fight in Iraq it's because they don't want to share in your defeat?

Uh.........that makes perfect sense.

Not that I agree with lowing.

usmarine2 wrote:

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

Bashing France is sooooo 2003..

that pic is more overused than madonnas vagina.  /fail

The surrendering jokes are even more overused than you using the word fail.

you fail.

TheAussieReaper wrote:

lowing wrote:

also don't gimme that bullshit about France and the American Revolution. France wanted nothing to do with it, UNTIL the colonies did all the leg work and proved the war could be won. Then and only then did France show up to share in the victory. AND THAT was only done to send a big FU to England. Frances biggest enemy.

Oh I see. So when France is allied with you, it's only to share in your victory. But when they don't fight in Iraq it's because they don't want to share in your defeat?

just ignore him. I really don't understand the logic that because somebody doesn't want to invade a nation that has done nothing to them (or to their allies, ahem), they're automatically "white flag wavin', surrendrin' terrist lovers."

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

usmarine2 wrote:

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

The surrendering jokes are even more overused than you using the word fail.

you fail.

Where did I say that?  Please point to it.  Way to stay on topic as usual troll.  Go bitch about jews you fucking nazi.

I know you miss your "friend" gunslinger but stay polite son.

miss?  he is still here dum dum