And look like a historically ignorant ass in the process!ZombieVampire! wrote:
I love how America bashing is terrible, but you can make fun of France as much as you like.
A minority.........you are generalizing...........that isn't allowed......................is it?ZombieVampire! wrote:
You do know they surrendered after their capital was taken, and they had no chance of victory? And that the French Resistance and the Free French were fighting before the US arrived?lowing wrote:
Well apparently France sees MORE benefit in surrendering and waiting for someone else to come do their fighting, so whatcha say really isn't all that true. Especially since the European countryside is home to so many American cemetaries in now free countriesZombieVampire! wrote:
If France saw benefit to France in fighting for someone else's freedom, they'd do so.
If the US saw benefit to the US in fighting for someone else's freedom, they'd do so.
Nope, that ain't what I said...TheAussieReaper wrote:
Oh I see. So when France is allied with you, it's only to share in your victory. But when they don't fight in Iraq it's because they don't want to share in your defeat?lowing wrote:
also don't gimme that bullshit about France and the American Revolution. France wanted nothing to do with it, UNTIL the colonies did all the leg work and proved the war could be won. Then and only then did France show up to share in the victory. AND THAT was only done to send a big FU to England. Frances biggest enemy.
I wasn't jokingAutralianChainsaw wrote:
The surrendering jokes are even more overused than you using the word fail.usmarine2 wrote:
that pic is more overused than madonnas vagina. /failAutralianChainsaw wrote:
Bashing France is sooooo 2003..
you fail.
Actually France had the reputation of waving the white flag long before Iraq, s oone has nothing to do with the other.HurricaИe wrote:
just ignore him. I really don't understand the logic that because somebody doesn't want to invade a nation that has done nothing to them (or to their allies, ahem), they're automatically "white flag wavin', surrendrin' terrist lovers."TheAussieReaper wrote:
Oh I see. So when France is allied with you, it's only to share in your victory. But when they don't fight in Iraq it's because they don't want to share in your defeat?lowing wrote:
also don't gimme that bullshit about France and the American Revolution. France wanted nothing to do with it, UNTIL the colonies did all the leg work and proved the war could be won. Then and only then did France show up to share in the victory. AND THAT was only done to send a big FU to England. Frances biggest enemy.
http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/text/victories.html
If you can't trust your google, who can you trust?
If you can't trust your google, who can you trust?
http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/text/france.html
"American Revolution
- In a move that will become quite familiar to future Americans, France claims a win even though the English colonists saw far more action. This is later known as "de Gaulle Syndrome", and leads to the Second Rule of French Warfare; "France only wins when America does most of the fighting.""
" French Revolution
- Won, primarily due the fact that the opponent was also French."
"American Revolution
- In a move that will become quite familiar to future Americans, France claims a win even though the English colonists saw far more action. This is later known as "de Gaulle Syndrome", and leads to the Second Rule of French Warfare; "France only wins when America does most of the fighting.""
" French Revolution
- Won, primarily due the fact that the opponent was also French."
Last edited by lowing (2008-07-13 10:50:50)
Is there something I posted about the French that is historically inaccurate? Do you mean the French were eager and willing to help the cause BEFORE it became clear that the colonies had a REAL chance at winning the war?ATG wrote:
And look like a historically ignorant ass in the process!ZombieVampire! wrote:
I love how America bashing is terrible, but you can make fun of France as much as you like.
Fucking hell 7 posts in a row, learn to edit lowing.
Don't read them, or quit bitching, however ya wanna handle it is fine by me.The Sheriff wrote:
Fucking hell 7 posts in a row, learn to edit lowing.
I'll put it this way... I'm no fan of religious extremism, but if this lady wants to be a complete submissive to the men in her life, that's her problem, not society's.
Now, if she had jihadist tendencies, then I'd understand the refusal of citizenship.
Now, if she had jihadist tendencies, then I'd understand the refusal of citizenship.
wish I knew where you read that rule.ZombieVampire! wrote:
I love how America bashing is terrible, but you can make fun of France as much as you like.
Funny how they weren't too concerned about how 'assimilated into French culture' the Goumier Units were when they sent them into battle in WW2.
That's France's prerogative I suppose but it's a bit rich colonising loads of Muslim countries then acting shocked that loads of French speaking Muslims might one day land on the doorstep of the 'Motherland' looking to enjoy the fruits of its society.
That's France's prerogative I suppose but it's a bit rich colonising loads of Muslim countries then acting shocked that loads of French speaking Muslims might one day land on the doorstep of the 'Motherland' looking to enjoy the fruits of its society.
france sucks. charles degaulle is a bastard. After the revolutionary war, France was the first country we were about to war with.
But it is a pretty country...you have to give them that.God Save the Queen wrote:
france sucks. charles degaulle is a bastard. After the revolutionary war, France was the first country we were about to war with.
unwritten rule!God Save the Queen wrote:
wish I knew where you read that rule.ZombieVampire! wrote:
I love how America bashing is terrible, but you can make fun of France as much as you like.
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
go back to arabia. arab.
Last edited by God Save the Queen (2008-07-13 12:29:06)
I actually like France in most respects. Their healthcare system is great, their food is great, their women are hot, and they have a rich artistic history.
Sadly, I think their future looks kind of sketchy though, considering their penchant for strikes and their apparent inability to properly integrate North African Muslims into their society.
Sadly, I think their future looks kind of sketchy though, considering their penchant for strikes and their apparent inability to properly integrate North African Muslims into their society.
I have a feeling this thread is gonna get closedGod Save the Queen wrote:
go back to arabia. arab.
Last edited by blademaster (2008-07-13 12:33:07)
he's not an arabblademaster wrote:
I have a feeling this thread is gonna get closed http://i.pbase.com/o4/98/583898/1/63713 … opcorn.gifGod Save the Queen wrote:
go back to arabia. arab.
I think he meant the woman in the articleGod Save the Queen wrote:
he's not an arabblademaster wrote:
I have a feeling this thread is gonna get closed http://i.pbase.com/o4/98/583898/1/63713 … opcorn.gifGod Save the Queen wrote:
go back to arabia. arab.
i so am my guatemala gang banger friend.God Save the Queen wrote:
he's not an arabblademaster wrote:
I have a feeling this thread is gonna get closed http://i.pbase.com/o4/98/583898/1/63713 … opcorn.gifGod Save the Queen wrote:
go back to arabia. arab.
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
viva mexico
Indians apna Kashmir hameshaay gaa.m3thod wrote:
i so am my guatemala gang banger friend.God Save the Queen wrote:
he's not an arabblademaster wrote:
I have a feeling this thread is gonna get closed http://i.pbase.com/o4/98/583898/1/63713 … opcorn.gif
Does that make any sense?
not really..Indians have taken our Kashmir?KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Indians apna Kashmir hameshaay gaa.m3thod wrote:
i so am my guatemala gang banger friend.God Save the Queen wrote:
he's not an arab
Does that make any sense?
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.