Pages: 1 2 3 4

 

Poll

What size screen do you play on?

< 17 inch9%9% - 17
17 - 19 inch45%45% - 77
20 - 22 inch32%32% - 55
23 - 25 inch10%10% - 18
26 - 28 inch0%0% - 1
29 - 31 inch0%0% - 0
32 and above1%1% - 3
Total: 171
2008-08-02 16:04:09
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6456|Winland

_Dominiko_PL wrote:

Lolzor... the 17-19 inches is winning, whereas on another poll sometime ago people claimed they have widescreen lcds... weird
You know, there are widescreen 17-19" LCDs.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
2008-08-02 18:36:12
csmag
Member
+92|6706|Canada
My penis monitor is 21.6 inches long.
2008-08-02 19:08:53
xxCaptainBlackxx
♥♦♣♠♥♦♣
+47|6902|internet

csmag wrote:

My penis monitor is 21.6 inches long.
you got one strange monitor there....


https://i38.tinypic.com/71r2p3.jpg
2008-08-02 22:46:01
blah
macaroni with cheeseeee
+111|6006|Croatia
19" Samsung LCD 4ms,1280x1024 on high settings
2008-08-03 01:13:54
melabon
Member
+8|6468|Germany
17" screen, like people say before: "Some people have a laptop." Great one, but only a laptop.
2008-08-03 03:44:49
H3RB4L ABU53
™
+45|6126|123 | 456 | 789 | Δ
17" I sit about 10 inches away so I don't need any bigger, 17" up close or 80" far away, whats the difference?
2008-08-03 03:46:12
H3RB4L ABU53
™
+45|6126|123 | 456 | 789 | Δ
Captainblack how long did it take you to make that picture? lol
2008-08-03 06:59:16
xxCaptainBlackxx
♥♦♣♠♥♦♣
+47|6902|internet

H3RB4L ABU53 wrote:

Captainblack how long did it take you to make that picture? lol
less than 10 min
2008-08-03 07:14:37
RDMC
Enemy Wheelbarrow Spotted..!!
+736|6824|Area 51
Normally on my 22'' wide screen but at the moment I play on both my monitor and my parents 42'' plasma
2008-08-04 00:40:05
Guruz
Sir
+20|7097|government yard in trenchtown.
24" + 1920x1200 + WidescreenFixer = awesomeness

Although, my crosshair is stretched too as illustrated before. (and so are the HUD & texts)

Doesn't bother me really, because the center of the crosshair is still in the right place.

Last edited by Guruz (2008-08-04 00:40:30)

2008-08-04 01:45:12
Flackstaff
<3
+11|6257|Finland
22" 1680 x 1050
2008-08-04 17:05:21
globefish23
sophisticated slacker
+334|6582|Graz, Austria
19" BenQ FP91G+
1152*864 at 75Hz
2008-08-04 17:08:58
Cheez
Herman is a warmaphrodite
+1,027|6697|King Of The Islands

globefish23 wrote:

19" BenQ FP91G+
1152*864 at 75Hz
At that res, you may as well play at 1280x1024 m80.
My state was founded by Batman. Your opinion is invalid.
2008-08-04 17:35:49
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6456|Winland

Cheez wrote:

globefish23 wrote:

19" BenQ FP91G+
1152*864 at 75Hz
At that res, you may as well play at 1280x1024 m80.
His monitor probably doesn't do 1280x960 at a decent frequency.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
2008-08-04 17:50:59
Brasso
member
+1,549|6889

22" Acer WS LED - 1680x1050
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
2008-08-06 09:14:10
csmag
Member
+92|6706|Canada

xxCaptainBlackxx wrote:

csmag wrote:

My penis monitor is 21.6 inches long.
you got one strange monitor there....


http://i38.tinypic.com/71r2p3.jpg
haha. I wish I had seen this sooner! How'd ya know i had a samsung? have a karma.
2008-08-06 10:20:38
xxCaptainBlackxx
♥♦♣♠♥♦♣
+47|6902|internet

csmag wrote:

xxCaptainBlackxx wrote:

csmag wrote:

My penis monitor is 21.6 inches long.
you got one strange monitor there....


http://i38.tinypic.com/71r2p3.jpg
haha. I wish I had seen this sooner! How'd ya know i had a samsung? have a karma.
lol
one in a million guess
2008-08-06 10:24:14
Blehm98
conservative hatemonger
+150|6722|meh-land

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Cheez wrote:

globefish23 wrote:

19" BenQ FP91G+
1152*864 at 75Hz
At that res, you may as well play at 1280x1024 m80.
His monitor probably doesn't do 1280x960 at a decent frequency.
decent frequency?

60 is good enough, i play on 1280x960 60hz with all low settings and it looks fine
2008-08-06 10:43:26
murmeliii^^
Member
+8|6215|Finland
17'' 1024x768 @ 75hz
2008-08-06 11:14:51
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6456|Winland

Blehm98 wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Cheez wrote:


At that res, you may as well play at 1280x1024 m80.
His monitor probably doesn't do 1280x960 at a decent frequency.
decent frequency?

60 is good enough, i play on 1280x960 60hz with all low settings and it looks fine
It doesn't. You just think so because you don't have anything better to compare to. Anything under 75 and my eyes will bleed.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
2008-08-06 12:34:01
H3RB4L ABU53
™
+45|6126|123 | 456 | 789 | Δ
60Hz on an LCD (if that's what your talking about) isn't any different on your eyes than 75Hz because LCD's dont literally refresh like a CRT monitor, just set it as high as it can go so you don't get tearing= if you have a monitor that can do 75Hz, and you set it to 50Hz and get 100fps, you will get much more tearing at 50Hz than 75Hz because the frames are much higher than refresh rate- if you get low fps it don't matter what you choose.
2008-08-06 13:02:21
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6456|Winland

H3RB4L ABU53 wrote:

60Hz on an LCD (if that's what your talking about) isn't any different on your eyes than 75Hz because LCD's dont literally refresh like a CRT monitor, just set it as high as it can go so you don't get tearing= if you have a monitor that can do 75Hz, and you set it to 50Hz and get 100fps, you will get much more tearing at 50Hz than 75Hz because the frames are much higher than refresh rate- if you get low fps it don't matter what you choose.
I know, please, I own two stickis in Tech, but I have yet to see an LCD monitor with 1152x864. I assumed he was using a CRT. Especially as there are many CRTs that do 1152x864@75. I've got three of them (different models) here myself.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

 

Pages: 1 2 3 4

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard