Official NFL Thread

2010-12-07 21:17:39

#3501

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6804|Long Island, New York

HaiBai wrote:
the funniest thing about the jets is that they've only beat one team above .500. the patriots, which apparently was a fluke because of how they got their asses handed to them monday.

also, I just want opinions: cutler > sanchez yes or no?

remember its his third offensive system in 3 years behind an oline thats terrible.

lol, and the bears have beaten two teams over .500... null point

cutler's better than sanchez right now but not really by much

the only truly "dominant" teams out there right now are the falcons, eagles and patriots. (ig is smiling from above because i said the falcons are good)

2010-12-07 22:19:14

#3502

Kmar: Truth is my Bitch; +5,695|6868|132 and Bush

11 Bravo wrote:
i learned not to bet on dislike or likes a long time ago......but more importantly not to buy into espn hype which drives the lines sometimes

better payouts ... which does happen. I once bet a three game parlay, I picked the favorites in every game, and they all lost ..lol.

Xbone Stormsurgezz

2010-12-08 06:35:18

#3503

nukchebi0: Пушкин, наше всё; +387|6591|New Haven, CT

Football in the NFL is barely watchable anymore. I don't understand how people can be so passionate towards a company that cares only about their pocketbook, or can be entertained by cookie cutter offensive philosophies and overly conservative coaching decisions that sap intrigue from the game.

2010-12-08 06:36:26

#3504

11 Bravo: Banned; +965|5504|Cleveland, Ohio

nukchebi0 wrote:
Football in the NFL is barely watchable anymore. I don't understand how people can be so passionate towards a company that cares only about their pocketbook, or can be entertained by cookie cutter offensive philosophies and overly conservative coaching decisions that sap intrigue from the game.

2010-12-08 14:34:49

#3505

HaiBai: Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me; +304|5751|Bolingbrook, Illinois

Poseidon wrote:
HaiBai wrote:
the funniest thing about the jets is that they've only beat one team above .500. the patriots, which apparently was a fluke because of how they got their asses handed to them monday.

also, I just want opinions: cutler > sanchez yes or no?

remember its his third offensive system in 3 years behind an oline thats terrible.
lol, and the bears have beaten two teams over .500... null point

cutler's better than sanchez right now but not really by much

the only truly "dominant" teams out there right now are the falcons, eagles and patriots. (ig is smiling from above because i said the falcons are good)

what i say about the jets has nothing to do with the bears at all. the same way 11b says the jets suck then you start flaming cleveland.

the jets have beat one team over .500. thats not a null point, it's a big point and it obviously shows that the jets are overrated.

2010-12-08 14:41:09

#3506

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6804|Long Island, New York

HaiBai wrote:
Poseidon wrote:
HaiBai wrote:
the funniest thing about the jets is that they've only beat one team above .500. the patriots, which apparently was a fluke because of how they got their asses handed to them monday.

also, I just want opinions: cutler > sanchez yes or no?

remember its his third offensive system in 3 years behind an oline thats terrible.
lol, and the bears have beaten two teams over .500... null point

cutler's better than sanchez right now but not really by much

the only truly "dominant" teams out there right now are the falcons, eagles and patriots. (ig is smiling from above because i said the falcons are good)
what i say about the jets has nothing to do with the bears at all. the same way 11b says the jets suck then you start flaming cleveland.

the jets have beat one team over .500. thats not a null point, it's a big point and it obviously shows that the jets are overrated.

and with that same logic it also means the bears are an overrated team too, so i don't know what you're getting at

2010-12-08 15:05:16

#3507

HaiBai: Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me; +304|5751|Bolingbrook, Illinois

uh, no they aren't. the bears don't have the respect of anybody and aren't talked about at all. in fact, most bears players feel that they're under the radar.

2010-12-08 15:09:08

#3508

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6804|Long Island, New York

HaiBai wrote:
uh, no they aren't. the bears don't have the respect of anybody and aren't talked about at all. in fact, most bears players feel that they're under the radar.

that has nothing to do with what you think of the team, and anyone who's read this thread since the beginning of the season knows BEARS 7-0!!!!

2010-12-08 15:54:10

#3509

HaiBai: Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me; +304|5751|Bolingbrook, Illinois

relax. it was a joke, and I'm confused why you keep bringing it up. want to know what isn't a joke? the silence of new york after they got raped by the patriots. they're fans actually thought they were good enough to compete. LoL

then rex ryan compared the jets to the '85 bears hahah. new york is delusional.

2010-12-08 15:55:28

#3510

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6804|Long Island, New York

HaiBai wrote:
relax. it was a joke, and I'm confused why you keep bringing it up. want to know what isn't a joke? the silence of new york after they got raped by the patriots. they're fans actually thought they were good enough to compete. LoL

then rex ryan compared the jets to the '85 bears hahah. new york is delusional.

*their

2010-12-08 16:10:52

#3511

HaiBai: Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me; +304|5751|Bolingbrook, Illinois

writing off of my phone with swype texting, don't give a shit

2010-12-08 20:27:59

#3512

nukchebi0: Пушкин, наше всё; +387|6591|New Haven, CT

mtb0minime wrote:
nukchebi0 wrote:
Translated:

Someone: I dislike <something> about <player or team from New York>.
P: Well your opinion is invalid because <team from "Someone"s hometown> is bad.

give me karma an i karma u cause we're both right

_{note i am not karma grubbing it is merely a way of communicating mutual understanding to establish security in what is necessarily a unilateral commitment as indicated by basic game theoretic analysis}

Last edited by nukchebi0 (2010-12-08 20:31:25)

2010-12-08 20:51:23

#3513

HaiBai: Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me; +304|5751|Bolingbrook, Illinois

so the bears are going to the superbowl amirite?!

2010-12-09 07:57:43

#3514

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6804|Long Island, New York

Vick leads in pro bowl voting...dunno if I'd go as far as to say he's the MVP, but he definitely deserves to be in it. If he'd started the season he'd have numbers comparable to someone like Rodgers.

The Eagles would be NOWHERE with Kolb. Glad Reid saw that.

2010-12-09 09:37:55

#3515

11 Bravo: Banned; +965|5504|Cleveland, Ohio

pro bowl means nothing...simply because it means nothing and the players dont want to be there.

2010-12-09 09:57:04

#3516

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6804|Long Island, New York

It's not about the Pro Bowl. It's about how people view Vick and his performance this year.

2010-12-09 10:28:41

#3517

13urnzz: Banned; +5,830|6764

Poseidon wrote:
Vick leads in pro bowl voting...

he'll probably win it too. i hear it's a real dogfight for second place . . .

2010-12-09 10:48:30

#3518

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6804|Long Island, New York

burnzz wrote:
Poseidon wrote:
Vick leads in pro bowl voting...
he'll probably win it too. i hear it's a real dogfight for second place . . .

i agree... you know what they say, every dog has it's day

2010-12-09 14:13:48

#3519

HaiBai: Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me; +304|5751|Bolingbrook, Illinois

brady > vick tbh

2010-12-09 15:17:47

#3520

KEN-JENNINGS: I am all that is MOD!; +2,980|6899|949

they both could get voted in. You know, because they are in different conferences

2010-12-09 18:24:24

#3521

HaiBai: Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me; +304|5751|Bolingbrook, Illinois

i should've mentioned i was talking about the mvp

2010-12-09 18:51:29

#3522

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6804|Long Island, New York

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/blog/shutdo … nfl-293917

I'm down for this.

I'm also down for Jenn Sterger.

2010-12-09 21:05:12

#3523

CC-Marley: Member; +407|7095

I'd go down on Jenn Sterger. Good luck trying to get me back up.

2010-12-10 03:44:30

#3524

ghettoperson: Member; +1,943|6916

"I don't think there are a lot of book deals or Lifetime movie offers for ladies who have seen professional quarterback genitalia on a cell phone."

That made me laugh.

2010-12-12 10:59:37

#3525

Jenspm: penis; +1,716|6999|St. Andrews / Oslo

wow

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/26774/flickricon.png

BF2S Forums Official NFL Thread

HaiBai wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:

nukchebi0 wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

HaiBai wrote:

HaiBai wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

HaiBai wrote:

HaiBai wrote:

HaiBai wrote:

mtb0minime wrote:

nukchebi0 wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

burnzz wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

Board footer