BF2S Forums Islam>Christainity

Yay - fundamentalist Islam has a new buddy!

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1009580.html

Lotta_Drool wrote:

Time for me to settle this " my deity can beat up your deity. " shit once and for all.

Mohammad:  Cut off peoples heads, has a cool " Members Only " rock you get to see, has lots of virgins for you if you blow yourself up ( women don't get this perk )

Jesus:  Mom was a virgin so can't even do "Yo Mamma" jokes on him, Turned water into wine, he had a cool posse that he would drink with, styled a cool goatie, Millions of Mexican's named after him.

Sorry, I have to give the nod to Jesus.  It is the water into wine that did it.  Besides he was the original, all other prophets after him were just copy cats.

I thought Moses was the original. Or wait, before him. Abraham. You know, how Judaism/Christianity/Islam are called Abrahamic religions after the "founder" that was Abraham

(no I'm not talking about Grampa Simpson)

(or that US President with the top hat)

Last edited by Mek-Stizzle (2008-08-08 07:39:55)

Yeah one has to wonder, in 2000 years when everyone is worshiping the "new, improved" religion, what will their jokes be like about us?

I just hope we find something real to worship.  I mean the golden cow was a real thing to worship in the day.  You could touch it and talk to it and all, but it didn't do anything back.

What I am talking about is maybe an Alien race that we have to sacrifice virgins too or maybe a black hole that we dive into in masses thinking it takes us to a dimesion of immortality.

This waiting 2000 years for the second coming has gotten old in the past 300 years.  Sure the Mormons tried to spice it up with new profits, holy underwear, and multiple wives; but lets just face  the fact that it is the same old song on a newer fiddle.

Let's just say that a religion with new profits can bring in more money.  Look at scientology.

Lotta_Drool wrote:

Let's just say that a religion with new profits can bring in more money.  Look at scientology.

No, they still get it the old fashioned way....extortion.

10% of everything you make, or you go to hell.

Last edited by Agent_Dung_Bomb (2008-08-08 10:56:11)

Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:

Jesus is actually a part of the Islamic faith. Mohamamamed was not born or even alive when christianity was formed. And since Jesus was just a man and not the son of god, he had no idea some guy was going to be born 600 years later and hijack his religion.

Buhhhhht, Jesus said he was the son of god.  So DO the Mooslims believe in Hesus Christ?

Last edited by Lotta_Drool (2008-08-08 11:07:06)

ATG wrote:

Lotta_Drool wrote:

Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:

Jesus is actually a part of the Islamic faith. Mohamamamed was not born or even alive when christianity was formed. And since Jesus was just a man and not the son of god, he had no idea some guy was going to be born 600 years later and hijack his religion.

Buhhhhht, Jesus said he was the son of god.  So DO the Mooslims believe in Hesus Christ?

Its Heyzoos duncecap boy.

*looks for samuel jacksons smack down in diehard 3*

mikkel wrote:

[TUF]Catbox wrote:

would you rather be a westerner lost in the middle east and walk up to an islamist's door for help
or be an islamist lost in a western country and walk up to a door in an all christian area to ask for help...

  i'm gonna say it might be safer to be the islamic guy walking up to the door of the christians house...

I'd rather be a westerner lost in the Middle East. If you had seen both sides of the bush, perhaps you'd revise your rhetoric.

...unless you're a Jewish Westerner, and then you'd definitely prefer to be lost in a Christian area rather than the Middle East.

kmarion wrote:

How many people did Jesus order killed?

wiki wrote:

A few Muslim scholars, such as W. N. Arafat and Barakat Ahmad, have disputed the historicity of the incident.[34] Ahmad, argues that only the leaders of the tribe were killed. (see his thesis)[35] Arafat argued that Ibn Ishaq gathered information from descendants of the Qurayza Jews, who embellished or manufactured the details of the incident.[36][37]

source

You would be crazy to compare morality of people back then to current day morality. Things must be taken into account. First that The executions were possibly conducted for treasonous reasons ( according to some), Mohammeds teachings claim that Christians/Jews should be treated with respect. Secondly, that beheading the men of the conquered and enslaving the women was pretty common practice back then, so wouldnt have been not unusual ( although it is clearly abhorrent now, similar practises still happen in areas of tribal Africa). Thirdly Mohammed was a warrior, Jesus was clearly not.

What it shows is how radical the teachings of Christ are considering the time. And although I would consider Mohammed an exponent of peace, he was still a warrior and subject to a lot of the morality that was normal at the time.

As for the OP, I would say that most Christians wouldnt consider Mohammed a terrorist. If they did, they are either ill informed, or not very good Christians.

You make the stupidest threads I've seen. I'm sorry, but it's true. Don't generalize every Muslim and every Christian especially when you're talking about views like this. Almost all religion is a joke anyways; at least nowadays.

xBlackPantherx wrote:

You make the stupidest threads I've seen. I'm sorry, but it's true. Don't generalize every Muslim and every Christian especially when you're talking about views like this. Almost all religion is a joke anyways; at least nowadays.

I agreed with you right up until that last sentence.

You can't yell on a forum