BF2S Forums Secret U.S. mission hauls uranium from Iraq

Yes this is interesting.

Lotta_Drool wrote:

yeah, old news to everyone but the hollywood peacenics that think Saddam was no danger.

Yeah Saddam was a real danger, he had the capability to attack the US within 45 minutes notice supposedly! For some strange reason he didn't decide to do that when his nation was invaded though.

The US are lucky they addressed the dangerous Saddam issue instead of wasting their time on time wasters like Kim Jong Il for example.

Braddock wrote:

Lotta_Drool wrote:

yeah, old news to everyone but the hollywood peacenics that think Saddam was no danger.

Yeah Saddam was a real danger, he had the capability to attack the US within 45 minutes notice supposedly! For some strange reason he didn't decide to do that when his nation was invaded though.

The US are lucky they addressed the dangerous Saddam issue instead of wasting their time on time wasters like Kim Jong Il for example.

I stand corrected, Hollywood Peacenics and Braddock.

Braddock wrote:

Who turned out to be more of a danger Saddam or Kim Jong Il?

jong dong is disarming.  saddam was playing games with the UN.  you tell me?

Braddock wrote:

Lotta_Drool wrote:

Braddock wrote:

Yeah Saddam was a real danger, he had the capability to attack the US within 45 minutes notice supposedly! For some strange reason he didn't decide to do that when his nation was invaded though.

The US are lucky they addressed the dangerous Saddam issue instead of wasting their time on time wasters like Kim Jong Il for example.

I stand corrected, Hollywood Peacenics and Braddock.

Who turned out to be more of a danger Saddam or Kim Jong Il?

LOL, well since the US didn't let Saddam play fuck a dope with them like he was with the UN and Europe, I would say Saddam didn't turn out to be a threat at all.

Kim Jong Short on the other hand will continue being appeased by the US government because he is just so damn cute and reminds bush of the little guy from different strokes.  " Whatch You Talking about Coffee AnAn? "

usmarine wrote:

Braddock wrote:

usmarine wrote:

jong dong is disarming.  saddam was playing games with the UN.  you tell me?

While y'all went sunbathing in the gulf Kim Dong decided to go get himself an actual nuclear weapon (the whole premise for invading Iraq in the first place). Who is to say Saddam wouldn't have just traded his nukes in for a relaxation of sanctions in exactly the same way North Korea did?

well to paraphrase bschuss, you are arguing what may have happened.

Everyone makes such a big fucking fuss about weapons of mass destruction and use them as an excuse to war monger but at the end of the day even the most supposedly mentally deranged of political leaders turn out to act responsibly when they have access to them. I'd say there are very few crackpots out there who would actually like to use a nuclear weapon on another nation, everyone understands the implications of mutually assured destruction and very few people want them.

Last edited by Braddock (2008-08-09 14:52:08)

usmarine wrote:

actually, i could care less about his wmd's.  he needed to go.  in hindsight we didnt know fellow arabs and muslims would rather harm then help the process.

stop generalising, it was a tiny minority of mooslims that became violent after being blown up.  The rest were quite peaceful.

Braddock wrote:

usmarine wrote:

actually, i could care less about his wmd's.  he needed to go.  in hindsight we didnt know fellow arabs and muslims would rather harm then help the process.

Typical imperialist attitude, deciding who "needs to go" in a country where you have no business interfering. Ironic coming from a man who's country was once a colony itself.

i dont care what you think tbh.  just because the Brits own you dont get sour at me.

Lotta_Drool wrote:

Braddock wrote:

usmarine wrote:

actually, i could care less about his wmd's.  he needed to go.  in hindsight we didnt know fellow arabs and muslims would rather harm then help the process.

Typical imperialist attitude, deciding who "needs to go" in a country where you have no business interfering. Ironic coming from a man who's country was once a colony itself.

Typical drunken ramblings from an Irish gnome herder that hides behind other countries military might throwing stones in the wrong direction.

You're just a bitter mongrel with a chip on his shoulder and less culture than a four week old yoghurt.

usmarine wrote:

Braddock wrote:

Who turned out to be more of a danger Saddam or Kim Jong Il?

jong dong is disarming.  saddam was playing games with the UN.  you tell me?

I think Saddam was:

A) Bluffing for time.  How else to hold the Iranians at bay?
B) Lied to by his own officials.  Go ahead, you tell Saddam we are no where close to the "beach ball"

C) Agreed.  Saddam was playing games with the UN and US at the same time.  He was bluffing and trying to give up only enough to look suspicious (see A.)

TrollmeaT wrote:

We probably sold it to them in the first place & that why we knew he had something. At least Iran didn't get it.

of course.  and clinton gave a whitewater reactor to n korea..........for energy purposes

This 'mission' isn't very secret if it got covered by a major news source.