^^ Surely you've got to have the History Channel.
I have still yet to see Comedy Central .
I have still yet to see Comedy Central .
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Not yet. We just got a shitload of channels pretty recently, so I expect that (and hopefully Military Channel HD ) will be added in the next batch, perhaps in the coming months.Kmarion wrote:
^^ Surely you've got to have the History Channel.
I have still yet to see Comedy Central .
Weird.. usually it comes with that whole Animal Planet/Science/Nat Geo update.Poseidon wrote:
Not yet. We just got a shitload of channels pretty recently, so I expect that (and hopefully Military Channel HD ) will be added in the next batch, perhaps in the coming months.Kmarion wrote:
^^ Surely you've got to have the History Channel.
I have still yet to see Comedy Central .
I've got two dedicated Olympics channels in HD .. one is in Korean and one is in Chinese.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
even this crazy Dutchy got Comedy CentralKmarion wrote:
^^ Surely you've got to have the History Channel.
I have still yet to see Comedy Central .
what kind of a yank are you?
In HD?^*AlphA*^ wrote:
even this crazy Dutchy got Comedy CentralKmarion wrote:
^^ Surely you've got to have the History Channel.
I have still yet to see Comedy Central .
what kind of a yank are you?
Xbone Stormsurgezz
ok 1-1Kmarion wrote:
In HD?^*AlphA*^ wrote:
even this crazy Dutchy got Comedy CentralKmarion wrote:
^^ Surely you've got to have the History Channel.
I have still yet to see Comedy Central .
what kind of a yank are you?
nah, very few channels are in HD here.
think Nat Geo, Discovery.
Some Viacom owned stations are lagging behind in the HD department. MTV is another one.
There is also two Discovery Hd channels. One is HD theatre (which isn't all that great), and there is the real Discovery Channel (which came around later). When HD first started everyone kept tunning into Discovery HD theater and was like "wtf where is myth busters".
There is also two Discovery Hd channels. One is HD theatre (which isn't all that great), and there is the real Discovery Channel (which came around later). When HD first started everyone kept tunning into Discovery HD theater and was like "wtf where is myth busters".
Xbone Stormsurgezz
They wont brodcast in 1080p because it uses less bandwidth to use an interlaced signal then a progressive one and if they use 1080i then nomatterif you have a 720P TV or a 1080P TV you will till be able to watch the TVN00bkilla55404 wrote:
1080P>1080i.usmarine wrote:
1080i makes normal tv seem like the stone ages
fail.
well screw you guys We are buying a 60" 1080P TV for the living room and unlike u guys(assuming anyway I know ryan dosent) I also Own my own HD TV that is mine that I bought with MY Moneycyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
But I got it like 4 years ago so suck it. Anyways next TV I'm getting is 52" 1080P.Ryan wrote:
Ha! I'm better than you, finally!cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
Rich fucker. I only have a 42" that only does 1080i
46" 1080p. Biotch.
I feel seriously outdated considering I still have a 27" CRT that gives you a headache after watching it for too long
My dad just got a new tv.
50" LG 1080p
and a 32" LG 1080p.
I don't see all the hype tbh, and having bars on the side of normal tv is a bit annoying.
50" LG 1080p
and a 32" LG 1080p.
I don't see all the hype tbh, and having bars on the side of normal tv is a bit annoying.
That's why you set your TV to "stretch" normal picture.Stimey wrote:
My dad just got a new tv.
50" LG 1080p
and a 32" LG 1080p.
I don't see all the hype tbh, and having bars on the side of normal tv is a bit annoying.
My cable has it, atleast.
Homer is fat enough already.Poseidon wrote:
That's why you set your TV to "stretch" normal picture.Stimey wrote:
My dad just got a new tv.
50" LG 1080p
and a 32" LG 1080p.
I don't see all the hype tbh, and having bars on the side of normal tv is a bit annoying.
My cable has it, atleast.
I'm just saying...it stretches standard TV to fit the screen. Doesn't really take away any quality either. Makes it look much better.Stimey wrote:
Homer is fat enough already.Poseidon wrote:
That's why you set your TV to "stretch" normal picture.Stimey wrote:
My dad just got a new tv.
50" LG 1080p
and a 32" LG 1080p.
I don't see all the hype tbh, and having bars on the side of normal tv is a bit annoying.
My cable has it, atleast.
Will try.
My opinion stands though, I don't really think it was worth 1500 dollars for that extra bit of quality.
Sure it looks good, but I think it could look better.
My opinion stands though, I don't really think it was worth 1500 dollars for that extra bit of quality.
Sure it looks good, but I think it could look better.
In England Virgin have only one HD channel, and Sky like 10. Not happening anytime soon.
I prefer it to be boxed tbh... otehrwise it looks too stretched.Poseidon wrote:
I'm just saying...it stretches standard TV to fit the screen. Doesn't really take away any quality either. Makes it look much better.Stimey wrote:
Homer is fat enough already.Poseidon wrote:
That's why you set your TV to "stretch" normal picture.
My cable has it, atleast.
besides, most channels use widescreen anyway.
I have better results using the cable box to fit. It's usually the pound key on your remote (If you have it).Poseidon wrote:
That's why you set your TV to "stretch" normal picture.Stimey wrote:
My dad just got a new tv.
50" LG 1080p
and a 32" LG 1080p.
I don't see all the hype tbh, and having bars on the side of normal tv is a bit annoying.
My cable has it, atleast.
Xbone Stormsurgezz