u and ur 200 blck... fine I'll try....max wrote:
time to go for 200 bclk
I think thats a pretty good score @4GHzghettoperson wrote:
I'd have thought at 4Ghz you'd be sub 10s easy with the i7's.
I'd have to OC my E8400 to 4.4GHz to get that score. 10%ghettoperson wrote:
It's good, certainly, but it doesn't seem far off the C2D times for that sort of clock.
Indeed.ghettoperson wrote:
It's good, certainly, but it doesn't seem far off the C2D times for that sort of clock.
Last edited by GC_PaNzerFIN (2008-12-27 10:28:05)
superpi
.Sup wrote:
superpi
gogogo
Last edited by menzo2003 (2009-01-18 15:37:40)
at least go into diagnostic or safe modemenzo2003 wrote:
http://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee37 … spi4hz.jpg.Sup wrote:
superpi
gogogo
with unclean vista
will do.Sup wrote:
at least go into diagnostic or safe modemenzo2003 wrote:
http://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee37 … spi4hz.jpg.Sup wrote:
superpi
gogogo
with unclean vista
+1
its not a bad CPU for single GPU gamer.... but if u are not GPU limited, Core i7 just EPIC AAZZZRAEPS the Phenom II.CrazeD wrote:
Indeed.ghettoperson wrote:
It's good, certainly, but it doesn't seem far off the C2D times for that sort of clock.
Plus the E8x00's OC higher.
Can't wait for Phenom II's....
13 ish. I thinkNaturn wrote:
I wonder how my E7300 @ 3.6Ghz will do.
CrazeD wrote:
Indeed.ghettoperson wrote:
It's good, certainly, but it doesn't seem far off the C2D times for that sort of clock.
Plus the E8x00's OC higher.
Can't wait for Phenom II's....
Only at really small resolution.GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
u liek superpi much but think about this:
Core i7 @ 3.8GHz vs. E8600 @ 4.4Ghz with a GTX 295 in COD: WAW for example.... The difference is more like 50% :>
and this is in today's games that are far from optimized to run 8 threads effectively.
edit: and btw I had ease latencies on my ram in that run... I could easily drop 0.25s or more from there...
upto 1920x1200 the difference is huge... unless you have a 30" TFT there....CrazeD wrote:
Only at really small resolution.GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
u liek superpi much but think about this:
Core i7 @ 3.8GHz vs. E8600 @ 4.4Ghz with a GTX 295 in COD: WAW for example.... The difference is more like 50% :>
and this is in today's games that are far from optimized to run 8 threads effectively.
edit: and btw I had ease latencies on my ram in that run... I could easily drop 0.25s or more from there...
At high resolution, it won't matter as much because the higher the res, the more GPU dependent it is.
Last edited by GC_PaNzerFIN (2008-12-27 11:43:11)
Wow, that's a lot better than I thought. I seem to think from what I'd seen when it was first released people seemed to be getting scores close to C2D. I guess I was wrong. People did seem annoyed with how it performed in games though.GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
upto 1920x1200 the difference is huge... unless you have a 30" TFT there....CrazeD wrote:
Only at really small resolution.GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
u liek superpi much but think about this:
Core i7 @ 3.8GHz vs. E8600 @ 4.4Ghz with a GTX 295 in COD: WAW for example.... The difference is more like 50% :>
and this is in today's games that are far from optimized to run 8 threads effectively.
edit: and btw I had ease latencies on my ram in that run... I could easily drop 0.25s or more from there...
At high resolution, it won't matter as much because the higher the res, the more GPU dependent it is.
just go see guru3d's test... if u don't believe me...
hell I jsut post a linky here: http://www.guru3d.com/article/core-i7-m … -review/19
with single GPU the performance is pretty close together. That's why ppl though O its the fail in gaming lololo... but when u add something like GTX 295 or HD 4870 CF there... wonders start to happen. Now you know why I got the Core i7 instead of C2Q.ghettoperson wrote:
Wow, that's a lot better than I thought. I seem to think from what I'd seen when it was first released people seemed to be getting scores close to C2D. I guess I was wrong. People did seem annoyed with how it performed in games though.GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
upto 1920x1200 the difference is huge... unless you have a 30" TFT there....CrazeD wrote:
Only at really small resolution.
At high resolution, it won't matter as much because the higher the res, the more GPU dependent it is.
just go see guru3d's test... if u don't believe me...
hell I jsut post a linky here: http://www.guru3d.com/article/core-i7-m … -review/19
Last edited by GC_PaNzerFIN (2008-12-27 11:54:37)
Last edited by MECtallica (2008-12-27 16:05:51)
