DBBrinson1 wrote:
deeznutz1245 wrote:
TheAussieReaper wrote:
All that is circumstantial evidence at best.
Keep digging.
Im not digging, I just think its worth a lokk eh?
See, that's the problem. The media is looking the other way. These actual NEWS stories are being swept aside or given minimal coverage. Everyone seems too concerned with Palin becoming a grandma....
Obama calls those people friends. It's kinda scary.
I think your last sentence highlights Braddock's point. Why is this any more scary or conspicuous than Cheney-Halliburton?
The American people and government have been openly dealing with terrorist organisations and cells since WWII. In fact it would probably be harder to find a President in US history that
hasn't had links or dealt with a terrorist group. Why is everyone getting so suspicious of Obama because of a friend and associate he met long ago in the past? People weren't bothered when the CIA and President were openly funding and supporting terrorist groups that were killing thousands of innocent people... why have standards changed now?
Every high-ranking US politician has had "links to terrorists"... why the "Hmmmm"?
Edit: Oh and Usmarine; my 'this has been discussed before' point meant that this Obama-link has been mentioned and discussed
very recently in more than one thread about said individual. It's not quite the same as repeated discussions on Israel, religion and Iraq that crop up every 2-3 weeks or so. How do you get away with being such a rude cunt on these Forums? It's a tiresome troll-persona.
Last edited by Uzique (2008-09-03 06:43:44)