What do you want me to address? The racist part? Should I search all your threads and post links?lowing wrote:
Is there any chance at all that you will address what is posted you, or are you going to continue to disect them and ignore there substance.sergeriver wrote:
I never said you were not consistent.lowing wrote:
I know what the majority of this forum THINKS of me. But honestly serge, if you are not going to address my posts, then stop quoting them for a response.
I read my posts, after all I write them, sometimes without spell checker, but I know exactly what I am saying, and I know exactly what my opinions are, and you nor anyone else can show, based on my post,s that my opinions are anything but socially motivated. Race has never come into play in any my opinions.
In fact, I think I may one of the most consistent posters in his opinions on this forum. I am biased toward me however.
that ain't no shit, I can't even poke my head in a thread without being hit by cyber tomatoes and lettuce and shit...lolPug wrote:
Lowing's not a racist. He hates everyone equally.
I still laugh at you guys...simply mentioning him causes a riot. You don't like what he's saying, he's consistent, why don't you guys give up?
Keep it up lowing. I love seeing this stuff unravel.
You guys wouldn't mind doing that in another thread though. I think it would be interesting to watch.
nope, you can start by going back to this thread and answer what was posted t oyou by me in the biginning of this "conversation"sergeriver wrote:
What do you want me to address? The racist part? Should I search all your threads and post links?lowing wrote:
Is there any chance at all that you will address what is posted you, or are you going to continue to disect them and ignore there substance.sergeriver wrote:
I never said you were not consistent.
I was thinking about asking for a "lowing the racist" sticky thread, as much attention my mere presence draws in the forums as of late...lolPug wrote:
You guys wouldn't mind doing that in another thread though. I think it would be interesting to watch.
I am getting cussed out left and right, even more than usual.
brb...I'll go get the cross for you. lollowing wrote:
I was thinking about asking for a "lowing the racist" sticky thread, as much attention my mere presence draws in the forums as of late...lol
I am getting cussed out left and right, even more than usual.
You want me to address this?lowing wrote:
Well Serge, I have not made a racist comment, here or anyewhere else for that matter. I do not compare Obama and Oprah, I have shown that Oprah is largely the reason for Obamas just add water instant success. She gave him exposure in Chicago and came out full force to fund and endorse a campaign.sergeriver wrote:
Kind of a racist comment to make. Why compare Obama to Oprah? Why not to a white person? You don't like Obama just coz he's black and you should admit it. Lame.lowing wrote:
Because it is really the only way Oprah...........sorry OBAMA can discredit McCain he has to make him appear that he is in fact a resurrected unpopular Bush. He does this because he can not defeat him in any other category except this mysterious "change" he is so proud of, yet will not disclose.
The fact that she is black really has nothing to do with it. The fact that Obana is black really has nothing to do with it. The fact that he is a liberal has everything to do with it.
See it as I called it along time ago. Say somethinng against Obama and you are a racist......tiresome, predictable and typical, but tiresome.
Sweden.SgtHeihn wrote:
OK, Question to the Euro's that know so much.
If the US system is not working, what country should we copy?
if you want a real answer then you must put forth a real question
ƒ³
no kiddin', jeezPug wrote:
brb...I'll go get the cross for you. lollowing wrote:
I was thinking about asking for a "lowing the racist" sticky thread, as much attention my mere presence draws in the forums as of late...lol
I am getting cussed out left and right, even more than usual.
there ya go serge. yeah you can start there. Or better yet maybe it would be better to move to a different thread relating t othis new issue you have with me.sergeriver wrote:
You want me to address this?lowing wrote:
Well Serge, I have not made a racist comment, here or anyewhere else for that matter. I do not compare Obama and Oprah, I have shown that Oprah is largely the reason for Obamas just add water instant success. She gave him exposure in Chicago and came out full force to fund and endorse a campaign.sergeriver wrote:
Kind of a racist comment to make. Why compare Obama to Oprah? Why not to a white person? You don't like Obama just coz he's black and you should admit it. Lame.
The fact that she is black really has nothing to do with it. The fact that Obana is black really has nothing to do with it. The fact that he is a liberal has everything to do with it.
See it as I called it along time ago. Say somethinng against Obama and you are a racist......tiresome, predictable and typical, but tiresome.
But answers lead to more questions...oug wrote:
Sweden.SgtHeihn wrote:
OK, Question to the Euro's that know so much.
If the US system is not working, what country should we copy?
if you want a real answer then you must put forth a real question
...why?
tall blonde women?
No issue at all, and not new, you know I think you have some prejudices. Too much derailing for now me thinks.lowing wrote:
there ya go serge. yeah you can start there. Or better yet maybe it would be better to move to a different thread relating t othis new issue you have with me.sergeriver wrote:
You want me to address this?lowing wrote:
Well Serge, I have not made a racist comment, here or anyewhere else for that matter. I do not compare Obama and Oprah, I have shown that Oprah is largely the reason for Obamas just add water instant success. She gave him exposure in Chicago and came out full force to fund and endorse a campaign.
The fact that she is black really has nothing to do with it. The fact that Obana is black really has nothing to do with it. The fact that he is a liberal has everything to do with it.
See it as I called it along time ago. Say somethinng against Obama and you are a racist......tiresome, predictable and typical, but tiresome.
ya thats a good example. a country where damn near everyone is the same race and religion.oug wrote:
Sweden.SgtHeihn wrote:
OK, Question to the Euro's that know so much.
If the US system is not working, what country should we copy?
You think I have "some prejudices"? Well hell serge, you do not have to "think" it. I will CONFIRM IT for you. I have a shit load of prejudices. ALL of the mare social in nature however, and not a single one of them are racial.sergeriver wrote:
No issue at all, and not new, you know I think you have some prejudices. Too much derailing for now me thinks.lowing wrote:
there ya go serge. yeah you can start there. Or better yet maybe it would be better to move to a different thread relating t othis new issue you have with me.sergeriver wrote:
You want me to address this?
Here is the problem, and why I am called a racist. I have stated, I hate saggers. To you this means I hate black people, when if fact all I said was I hate saggers without mentioning any race. It is not my fault that most saggers may be black. Race is not the issue, sagging is. Ya see how shit gets twisted and I get labeled a racist?
You hate saggers.
Your spelling sucks or I am lost.
Your spelling sucks or I am lost.
naggers are saggers.
that should be a new p diddy album
that should be a new p diddy album
You hate saggers, most saggers are black and are most blacks sagger?lowing wrote:
You think I have "some prejudices"? Well hell serge, you do not have to "think" it. I will CONFIRM IT for you. I have a shit load of prejudices. ALL of the mare social in nature however, and not a single one of them are racial.sergeriver wrote:
No issue at all, and not new, you know I think you have some prejudices. Too much derailing for now me thinks.lowing wrote:
there ya go serge. yeah you can start there. Or better yet maybe it would be better to move to a different thread relating t othis new issue you have with me.
Here is the problem, and why I am called a racist. I have stated, I hate saggers. To you this means I hate black people, when if fact all I said was I hate saggers without mentioning any race. It is not my fault that most saggers may be black. Race is not the issue, sagging is. Ya see how shit gets twisted and I get labeled a racist?
Well you know it all's seem to be able to point out problems but can never give a answer.oug wrote:
Sweden.SgtHeihn wrote:
OK, Question to the Euro's that know so much.
If the US system is not working, what country should we copy?
if you want a real answer then you must put forth a real question
You say Sweden, their population is the same size of New York City. Its alot easier to run a country that is smaller and has a more unified population. They don't have the social and economic problems the US does.
True that, that's why I said this wasn't really a serious answer. Granted, if the US really did want to pursue another model of governance then the swedish model would probably be the one to follow - and despite the obvious problems with doing so, if any country were able to manage such a change then the US would be it.SgtHeihn wrote:
Well you know it all's seem to be able to point out problems but can never give a answer.oug wrote:
Sweden.SgtHeihn wrote:
OK, Question to the Euro's that know so much.
If the US system is not working, what country should we copy?
if you want a real answer then you must put forth a real question
You say Sweden, their population is the same size of New York City. Its alot easier to run a country that is smaller and has a more unified population. They don't have the social and economic problems the US does.
btw marine, Sweden has lots of immigrants for its population - mainly Turks and Iraqis, but also Greeks etc. I can safely speak about Stockholm.
But I guess the rest of the country isn't like that - though I didn't go anywhere else.
ƒ³
The offical language of pakistan is Indo-Aryan. That mean i am off a master race and i'm gonna zyklon B your inferior ass.usmarine wrote:
are people from india considered black?sergeriver wrote:
Well, black people have a darker skin, you can eaily tell they are black tbh.
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
And it's a reason for that ...SgtHeihn wrote:
Well you know it all's seem to be able to point out problems but can never give a answer.oug wrote:
Sweden.SgtHeihn wrote:
OK, Question to the Euro's that know so much.
If the US system is not working, what country should we copy?
if you want a real answer then you must put forth a real question
You say Sweden, their population is the same size of New York City. Its alot easier to run a country that is smaller and has a more unified population. They don't have the social and economic problems the US does.
What is the huge difference between running 9 million people and 300 million ? ... does it take more government pr citizen ?
The population is not as unified as you think, the nordic countries have problems with illegal aliens, religion etc etc ...
They don't have nearly the same economic problems because they govern in a socialistic society where near everyone is treated equal and they believe in sharing a part of their wealth with the less fortunate, they also don't segregate the populace to the degree the US does (both government and citizens)
Sweden is actually a good example, i was thinking Norway first but that wouldn't be fair seeing as we have a resource surplus that only can be matched by certain arabic states & kingdoms ... Sweden is imo the most American country in Europe ...
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
oh come on. its easier because its smaller and everyone is pretty much the same race and religion. if you dont think that makes things easier, then i dont know what else to say.Varegg wrote:
And it's a reason for that ...SgtHeihn wrote:
Well you know it all's seem to be able to point out problems but can never give a answer.oug wrote:
Sweden.
if you want a real answer then you must put forth a real question
You say Sweden, their population is the same size of New York City. Its alot easier to run a country that is smaller and has a more unified population. They don't have the social and economic problems the US does.
What is the huge difference between running 9 million people and 300 million ? ... does it take more government pr citizen ?
The population is not as unified as you think, the nordic countries have problems with illegal aliens, religion etc etc ...
They don't have nearly the same economic problems because they govern in a socialistic society where near everyone is treated equal and they believe in sharing a part of their wealth with the less fortunate, they also don't segregate the populace to the degree the US does (both government and citizens)
Sweden is actually a good example, i was thinking Norway first but that wouldn't be fair seeing as we have a resource surplus that only can be matched by certain arabic states & kingdoms ... Sweden is imo the most American country in Europe ...
As i mentioned it's not pretty much the same race and religion as you think it is, maybe more than the US but not so much that it would matter in the comparison made ...usmarine wrote:
oh come on. its easier because its smaller and everyone is pretty much the same race and religion. if you dont think that makes things easier, then i dont know what else to say.Varegg wrote:
And it's a reason for that ...SgtHeihn wrote:
Well you know it all's seem to be able to point out problems but can never give a answer.
You say Sweden, their population is the same size of New York City. Its alot easier to run a country that is smaller and has a more unified population. They don't have the social and economic problems the US does.
What is the huge difference between running 9 million people and 300 million ? ... does it take more government pr citizen ?
The population is not as unified as you think, the nordic countries have problems with illegal aliens, religion etc etc ...
They don't have nearly the same economic problems because they govern in a socialistic society where near everyone is treated equal and they believe in sharing a part of their wealth with the less fortunate, they also don't segregate the populace to the degree the US does (both government and citizens)
Sweden is actually a good example, i was thinking Norway first but that wouldn't be fair seeing as we have a resource surplus that only can be matched by certain arabic states & kingdoms ... Sweden is imo the most American country in Europe ...
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
Ya, Christians who pray for peace and take care of the poor and disabled..... real bat shit craziness there. It's almost like the WWJD club.FEOS wrote:
No, they pander to the bat shit crazy ones on YOUR side of the aisle.Spearhead wrote:
Not the bat shit crazy ones you've got on your side of the isle.S.Lythberg wrote:
Obama and Hillary do it too
Last edited by Spearhead (2008-09-04 15:11:37)
WTF? You have no brains what-so-ever. Fricken Argentinians.sergeriver wrote:
Nobody wants to be seen as the continuation of this administration. However, McCain is Republican and that's his worst sin, belonging to the same party than GWB will cost him the election without any doubt.
Edit: Oh and to the person who claims I am not part Irish, if you saw a pic of me you would see I am Irish.
Last edited by War Man (2008-09-04 14:18:42)
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.