I have no idea, the trend seems to have started with the black youth. Irrelevent as it is.sergeriver wrote:
You hate saggers, most saggers are black and are most blacks sagger?lowing wrote:
You think I have "some prejudices"? Well hell serge, you do not have to "think" it. I will CONFIRM IT for you. I have a shit load of prejudices. ALL of the mare social in nature however, and not a single one of them are racial.sergeriver wrote:
No issue at all, and not new, you know I think you have some prejudices. Too much derailing for now me thinks.
Here is the problem, and why I am called a racist. I have stated, I hate saggers. To you this means I hate black people, when if fact all I said was I hate saggers without mentioning any race. It is not my fault that most saggers may be black. Race is not the issue, sagging is. Ya see how shit gets twisted and I get labeled a racist?
What part is wrong? Enlighten us.War Man wrote:
WTF? You have no brains what-so-ever. Fricken Argentinians.sergeriver wrote:
Nobody wants to be seen as the continuation of this administration. However, McCain is Republican and that's his worst sin, belonging to the same party than GWB will cost him the election without any doubt.
Edit: Oh and to the person who claims I am not part Irish, if you saw a pic of me you would see I am Irish.
Yet you hate naggers, I mean the saggers.lowing wrote:
I have no idea, the trend seems to have started with the black youth. Irrelevent as it is.sergeriver wrote:
You hate saggers, most saggers are black and are most blacks sagger?lowing wrote:
You think I have "some prejudices"? Well hell serge, you do not have to "think" it. I will CONFIRM IT for you. I have a shit load of prejudices. ALL of the mare social in nature however, and not a single one of them are racial.
Here is the problem, and why I am called a racist. I have stated, I hate saggers. To you this means I hate black people, when if fact all I said was I hate saggers without mentioning any race. It is not my fault that most saggers may be black. Race is not the issue, sagging is. Ya see how shit gets twisted and I get labeled a racist?
Being republican isn't a frikin' sin you ass. It won't cost him the election, because people who believe McCain is "McBush" are few in numbers, and the people with brains know that McCain is nothing like Bush.sergeriver wrote:
What part is wrong? Enlighten us.War Man wrote:
WTF? You have no brains what-so-ever. Fricken Argentinians.sergeriver wrote:
Nobody wants to be seen as the continuation of this administration. However, McCain is Republican and that's his worst sin, belonging to the same party than GWB will cost him the election without any doubt.
Edit: Oh and to the person who claims I am not part Irish, if you saw a pic of me you would see I am Irish.
It actually offends me that you think you know so much about the U.S, yet you don't live here, relatives don't count, neither do 'visits'.
Slow down slick. I didn't mean that being a Republican was a sin itself duh. I meant that in this very moment, belonging to the same party than GWB was McCain's biggest sin. Geez, you read all the time Liberals this and that and nobody cries like babies. Well, if this is for Americans only then make the forum just for Americans. Don't talk about Iraq, you don't live there. Gimmie a fucking break. In fact if you read what I posted it was kinda a compliment to McCain. Translated for you and the other caveman I meant that McCain will lose the election coz of GWB, not that McCain was like him. Carry on.SoC./Omega wrote:
Being republican isn't a frikin' sin you ass. It won't cost him the election, because people who believe McCain is "McBush" are few in numbers, and the people with brains know that McCain is nothing like Bush.sergeriver wrote:
What part is wrong? Enlighten us.War Man wrote:
WTF? You have no brains what-so-ever. Fricken Argentinians.
Edit: Oh and to the person who claims I am not part Irish, if you saw a pic of me you would see I am Irish.
It actually offends me that you think you know so much about the U.S, yet you don't live here, relatives don't count, neither do 'visits'.
Last edited by sergeriver (2008-09-04 17:46:15)
Yeah serge I hate saggers.sergeriver wrote:
Yet you hate naggers, I mean the saggers.lowing wrote:
I have no idea, the trend seems to have started with the black youth. Irrelevent as it is.sergeriver wrote:
You hate saggers, most saggers are black and are most blacks sagger?
Oh, I know, I just had to take out my anger on you; had a bad day.sergeriver wrote:
Slow down slick. I didn't mean that being a Republican was a sin itself duh.SoC./Omega wrote:
Being republican isn't a frikin' sin you ass. It won't cost him the election, because people who believe McCain is "McBush" are few in numbers, and the people with brains know that McCain is nothing like Bush.sergeriver wrote:
What part is wrong? Enlighten us.
It actually offends me that you think you know so much about the U.S, yet you don't live here, relatives don't count, neither do 'visits'.
Last edited by SoC./Omega (2008-09-04 17:45:57)
Do you feel better? Ok, np.SoC./Omega wrote:
Oh, I know, I just had to take out my anger on you; had a bad day.sergeriver wrote:
Slow down slick. I didn't mean that being a Republican was a sin itself duh.SoC./Omega wrote:
Being republican isn't a frikin' sin you ass. It won't cost him the election, because people who believe McCain is "McBush" are few in numbers, and the people with brains know that McCain is nothing like Bush.
It actually offends me that you think you know so much about the U.S, yet you don't live here, relatives don't count, neither do 'visits'.
Disagreed. McCain is not quite like Bush--look at his recentest talks to prove that.sergeriver wrote:
Slow down slick. I didn't mean that being a Republican was a sin itself duh. I meant that in this very moment, belonging to the same party than GWB was McCain's biggest sin. Geez, you read all the time Liberals this and that and nobody cries like babies. Well, if this is for Americans only then make the forum just for Americans. Don't talk about Iraq, you don't live there. Gimmie a fucking break. In fact if you read what I posted it was kinda a compliment to McCain. Translated for you and the other caveman I meant that McCain will lose the election coz of GWB, not that McCain was like him. Carry on.SoC./Omega wrote:
Being republican isn't a frikin' sin you ass. It won't cost him the election, because people who believe McCain is "McBush" are few in numbers, and the people with brains know that McCain is nothing like Bush.sergeriver wrote:
What part is wrong? Enlighten us.
It actually offends me that you think you know so much about the U.S, yet you don't live here, relatives don't count, neither do 'visits'.
What may hurt him most in the election is not his tie with GWB. In fact, most people see that they are two different people. The words "republican" and "democrat" don't mean too much these days--so look at the people themselves. Sure, they may share the same party name, but is the similarity overpowering the true fact that THEY ARE TWO DIFFERENT PEOPLE???
Granted, may associate GWB with Republican with McCain, but that's phony. It's like saying you're like Eva Peron. Why? because you're argentinian. See? makes no sense. People see through that.
I like pie.
McCain is nothing like Bush... in fact they were at odds more than they agreed on things... the Obama camp claim that McCain is 4 more years of Bush isn't resonating...
Love is the answer
Catbox, you are forgetting the McCain comments where he said "I have agreed with Bush much more than I have disagreed with him."
He isn't the maverick he used to be.
He isn't the maverick he used to be.
The DNC likes to package people and present them as some sort of reincarnation of previous notables they can already relate to. John Kerry wanted to be seen as "the next JFK." And so they present McCain as "the next Bush."
Given Bush is an empty head, and McCain a worn out suit, its bound to be a continuation run from behind the scenes by who knows whom.Pandering to the right wing evangelicals who want to turn the USA into a Christian nation and then to prepare for rapture.
Fuck Israel
well obama voted with bush 40% of the time, so obama is 40% stupid i reckon.nukchebi0 wrote:
Catbox, you are forgetting the McCain comments where he said "I have agreed with Bush much more than I have disagreed with him."
He isn't the maverick he used to be.
or we can pretty much all agree that the number is pointless since so many votes are pretty much unanimous or not "ground breaking" legislation. the media gets the sheep caught up in these numbers, but i think to be fair and objective you have to weed out all the small votes and concentrate on the big issues.
I never said they were the same, I just pointed out that it's a tough challenge for McCain to win this election coz of GWB's failures. Like it or not, people punish parties when they vote, or why do you think you have a Dem Congress? And no, I ain't like Eva Peron just coz I'm Argentinian, in fact I despise her and what she represents. I hate PJ (Partido Justicialista) which is the party that Peron created. All corrupt politicians, even if that's a cliche.TSI wrote:
Disagreed. McCain is not quite like Bush--look at his recentest talks to prove that.sergeriver wrote:
Slow down slick. I didn't mean that being a Republican was a sin itself duh. I meant that in this very moment, belonging to the same party than GWB was McCain's biggest sin. Geez, you read all the time Liberals this and that and nobody cries like babies. Well, if this is for Americans only then make the forum just for Americans. Don't talk about Iraq, you don't live there. Gimmie a fucking break. In fact if you read what I posted it was kinda a compliment to McCain. Translated for you and the other caveman I meant that McCain will lose the election coz of GWB, not that McCain was like him. Carry on.SoC./Omega wrote:
Being republican isn't a frikin' sin you ass. It won't cost him the election, because people who believe McCain is "McBush" are few in numbers, and the people with brains know that McCain is nothing like Bush.
It actually offends me that you think you know so much about the U.S, yet you don't live here, relatives don't count, neither do 'visits'.
What may hurt him most in the election is not his tie with GWB. In fact, most people see that they are two different people. The words "republican" and "democrat" don't mean too much these days--so look at the people themselves. Sure, they may share the same party name, but is the similarity overpowering the true fact that THEY ARE TWO DIFFERENT PEOPLE???
Granted, may associate GWB with Republican with McCain, but that's phony. It's like saying you're like Eva Peron. Why? because you're argentinian. See? makes no sense. People see through that.
How come you are not a sheep? Don't you read newspapers or watch tv? Do you receive all your news straight from Dick Cheney?usmarine wrote:
well obama voted with bush 40% of the time, so obama is 40% stupid i reckon.nukchebi0 wrote:
Catbox, you are forgetting the McCain comments where he said "I have agreed with Bush much more than I have disagreed with him."
He isn't the maverick he used to be.
or we can pretty much all agree that the number is pointless since so many votes are pretty much unanimous or not "ground breaking" legislation. the media gets the sheep caught up in these numbers, but i think to be fair and objective you have to weed out all the small votes and concentrate on the big issues.
I would like to point out in seven pages so far, there has only been one attempt to explain the difference between the candidates, and in that only a difference between Obama and McCain.
Are you media sheep?
Are you media sheep?
dont talk to me pls.sergeriver wrote:
How come you are not a sheep? Don't you read newspapers or watch tv? Do you receive all your news straight from Dick Cheney?usmarine wrote:
well obama voted with bush 40% of the time, so obama is 40% stupid i reckon.nukchebi0 wrote:
Catbox, you are forgetting the McCain comments where he said "I have agreed with Bush much more than I have disagreed with him."
He isn't the maverick he used to be.
or we can pretty much all agree that the number is pointless since so many votes are pretty much unanimous or not "ground breaking" legislation. the media gets the sheep caught up in these numbers, but i think to be fair and objective you have to weed out all the small votes and concentrate on the big issues.
Sorry for offending you.usmarine wrote:
dont talk to me pls.sergeriver wrote:
How come you are not a sheep? Don't you read newspapers or watch tv? Do you receive all your news straight from Dick Cheney?usmarine wrote:
well obama voted with bush 40% of the time, so obama is 40% stupid i reckon.
or we can pretty much all agree that the number is pointless since so many votes are pretty much unanimous or not "ground breaking" legislation. the media gets the sheep caught up in these numbers, but i think to be fair and objective you have to weed out all the small votes and concentrate on the big issues.
because after all the two parties ain't that much differentusmarine wrote:
well obama voted with bush 40% of the time, so obama is 40% stupid i reckon.nukchebi0 wrote:
Catbox, you are forgetting the McCain comments where he said "I have agreed with Bush much more than I have disagreed with him."
He isn't the maverick he used to be.
or we can pretty much all agree that the number is pointless since so many votes are pretty much unanimous or not "ground breaking" legislation. the media gets the sheep caught up in these numbers, but i think to be fair and objective you have to weed out all the small votes and concentrate on the big issues.
btw: blimey! marime wrote 4 lines total!!1!1
ƒ³
how about you just shut the fuck up then. there, how many lines is that?oug wrote:
because after all the two parties ain't that much differentusmarine wrote:
well obama voted with bush 40% of the time, so obama is 40% stupid i reckon.nukchebi0 wrote:
Catbox, you are forgetting the McCain comments where he said "I have agreed with Bush much more than I have disagreed with him."
He isn't the maverick he used to be.
or we can pretty much all agree that the number is pointless since so many votes are pretty much unanimous or not "ground breaking" legislation. the media gets the sheep caught up in these numbers, but i think to be fair and objective you have to weed out all the small votes and concentrate on the big issues.
btw: blimey! marime wrote 4 lines total!!1!1
any dems want to take a crack at this or what? or are you just satisfied with spouting off the 90% bollocks?usmarine wrote:
well obama voted with bush 40% of the time, so obama is 40% stupid i reckon.nukchebi0 wrote:
Catbox, you are forgetting the McCain comments where he said "I have agreed with Bush much more than I have disagreed with him."
He isn't the maverick he used to be.
or we can pretty much all agree that the number is pointless since so many votes are pretty much unanimous or not "ground breaking" legislation. the media gets the sheep caught up in these numbers, but i think to be fair and objective you have to weed out all the small votes and concentrate on the big issues.
1usmarine wrote:
how about you just shut the fuck up then. there, how many lines is that?oug wrote:
because after all the two parties ain't that much differentusmarine wrote:
well obama voted with bush 40% of the time, so obama is 40% stupid i reckon.
or we can pretty much all agree that the number is pointless since so many votes are pretty much unanimous or not "ground breaking" legislation. the media gets the sheep caught up in these numbers, but i think to be fair and objective you have to weed out all the small votes and concentrate on the big issues.
btw: blimey! marime wrote 4 lines total!!1!1
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
you're a dem too. You're voting obama.usmarine wrote:
any dems want to take a crack at this or what? or are you just satisfied with spouting off the 90% bollocks?usmarine wrote:
well obama voted with bush 40% of the time, so obama is 40% stupid i reckon.nukchebi0 wrote:
Catbox, you are forgetting the McCain comments where he said "I have agreed with Bush much more than I have disagreed with him."
He isn't the maverick he used to be.
or we can pretty much all agree that the number is pointless since so many votes are pretty much unanimous or not "ground breaking" legislation. the media gets the sheep caught up in these numbers, but i think to be fair and objective you have to weed out all the small votes and concentrate on the big issues.
Welcome to the club slick.
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
im independent home slice. if i had my choice, it would be obama and palin tbh.m3thod wrote:
Welcome to the club slick.