Pages: 1 2

Topic closed

2008-09-07 07:27:02
ELITE-UK
Scratching my back
+170|6733|SHEFFIELD, ENGLAND
http://uk.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/m … eview.html

'Mercenaries 2's visuals are inconsistent. The Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 versions of the game are mostly similar, but the PS3 has some ugly aliasing problems'

Tip of the iceberg..
2008-09-07 07:38:21
kptk92
u
+972|6667|tc_london
lol owned

Besides, graphics do not make a game. Its the actual gameplay that makes the game what it is.

I've just finished Mercs 2, boy that Nuke was awesome
2008-09-07 07:56:14
bennisboy
Member
+829|6906|Poundland

kptk92 wrote:

lol owned

Besides, graphics do not make a game. Its the actual gameplay that makes the game what it is.

I've just finished Mercs 2, boy that Nuke was awesome
Did u read that link? The gameplay got completely panned
2008-09-07 07:58:13
kptk92
u
+972|6667|tc_london

bennisboy wrote:

kptk92 wrote:

lol owned

Besides, graphics do not make a game. Its the actual gameplay that makes the game what it is.

I've just finished Mercs 2, boy that Nuke was awesome
Did u read that link? The gameplay got completely panned
No not really because its their opinion.

And they suck cock
2008-09-07 08:02:08
bennisboy
Member
+829|6906|Poundland
Still got panned though. Just like in most reviews I've read.
2008-09-07 08:02:38
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7021

bennisboy wrote:

Still got panned though. Just like in most reviews I've read.
ya, i aint buying it.
2008-09-07 08:02:44
kptk92
u
+972|6667|tc_london
ye but its about the gamer who wants to buy the game. that is just someone's opinion.
2008-09-07 08:04:02
r'Eeee
That's how I roll, BITCH!
+311|6708

They have been working on this game for what 2-3 years? And it ends up in the garbage.
2008-09-07 08:06:32
kptk92
u
+972|6667|tc_london
in ur opinion
2008-09-07 08:20:33
Vilham
Say wat!?
+580|7026|UK
Really because on the GT comparison video there was a clear difference between the PS3 and xbox360 versions and the PS3 one looked MILES better.
2008-09-07 08:21:26
kptk92
u
+972|6667|tc_london

Vilham wrote:

Really because on the GT comparison video there was a clear difference between the PS3 and xbox360 versions and the PS3 one looked MILES better.
inb4consolewar
2008-09-07 08:22:48
Vilham
Say wat!?
+580|7026|UK
Well yeah a 360 fan boy can argue if he wants, but the textures on the PS3 version ARE better than on the 360 version.
2008-09-07 08:23:46
jord
Member
+2,382|6937|The North, beyond the wall.
I might get this game when I get some batteries.

Fucking why couldn't they just give me a wired controller...
2008-09-07 08:26:40
kptk92
u
+972|6667|tc_london

jord wrote:

I might get this game when I get some batteries.

Fucking why couldn't they just give me a wired controller...
Get a Play and Charge kit.
2008-09-07 10:59:44
Mint Sauce
Frighteningly average
+780|6546|eng

r'Eeee wrote:

They have been working on this game for what 2-3 years? And it ends up in the garbage.
Bit like Haze, and like Haze, the graphics are crap.
#rekt
2008-09-07 11:28:27
kptk92
u
+972|6667|tc_london
oMGZZZZ GRFICS1 R LYF!!!1
1
2008-09-07 11:32:37
ELITE-UK
Scratching my back
+170|6733|SHEFFIELD, ENGLAND

Mint Sauce wrote:

r'Eeee wrote:

They have been working on this game for what 2-3 years? And it ends up in the garbage.
Bit like Haze, and like Haze, the graphics are crap.
Definately, the character models looks quite good, but the rest was a real let down, but i still liked the game and finished it.
2008-09-07 11:42:17
SamTheMan:D
Banned
+856|6233|England

so ye, its kinda shit
2008-09-07 11:48:15
kptk92
u
+972|6667|tc_london
in ur opinion
2008-09-07 11:52:26
Zimmer
Un Moderador
+1,688|7015|Scotland

Vilham wrote:

Well yeah a 360 fan boy can argue if he wants, but the textures on the PS3 version ARE better than on the 360 version.
I couldn't give a shit. The game is so bad that I wouldn't actually take the graphics into account before branding it as the biggest failure of this year. It's god awful.
2008-09-07 11:53:56
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|6880|London, England
I've heard and seen how this game is an epic failure. So I don't think people even care
2008-09-07 11:55:16
kptk92
u
+972|6667|tc_london

Vilham wrote:

Well yeah a 360 fan boy can argue if he wants, but the textures on the PS3 version ARE better than on the 360 version.
dont bring this omg ur a fanboy shit in ham u double feggit
2008-09-07 12:00:03
SamTheMan:D
Banned
+856|6233|England

kptk92 wrote:

Vilham wrote:

Well yeah a 360 fan boy can argue if he wants, but the textures on the PS3 version ARE better than on the 360 version.
dont bring this omg ur a fanboy shit in ham u double feggit
personal attack
2008-09-07 12:01:53
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6797|Long Island, New York

Mek-Stizzle wrote:

I've heard and seen how this game is an epic failure. So I don't think people even care
Unfortunately. I'm still considering picking it up at a much later date, but only if they fix the massive amounts of bugs I've heard about.

kptk92 wrote:

Vilham wrote:

Well yeah a 360 fan boy can argue if he wants, but the textures on the PS3 version ARE better than on the 360 version.
dont bring this omg ur a fanboy shit in ham u double feggit
Why even bother? It's not even worth it to get into it with him ffs.
2008-09-07 15:04:55
Vilham
Say wat!?
+580|7026|UK

Poseidon wrote:

kptk92 wrote:

Vilham wrote:

Well yeah a 360 fan boy can argue if he wants, but the textures on the PS3 version ARE better than on the 360 version.
dont bring this omg ur a fanboy shit in ham u double feggit
Why even bother? It's not even worth it to get into it with him ffs.
sorry i forgot the fan boys would get upset over the truth.

as to kptk.

1. lol calling other people fanboys, ur a funny guy.
2. It has nothing to do with the consoles the graphics resolution on the ps3 version IS higher.

Live with it.

Topic closed

Pages: 1 2

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard