BF2S Forums What if Venezuela bought nukes from Russia?

KILLSWITCH wrote:

It would be fucking mint, this world is boring anyway.  The camel jockeys bore me no end.  At least with the commies you know where you stand, now give me some more vodka.

Need some jungle opposed to desert and sand tbh.

Spearhead wrote:

War Man wrote:

FEOS wrote:

UN would shit kittens, since it would violate the NNPT, to which both Russia and Venezuela are signatories.

So...since the UN would be all in a dither...nothing.

UN, do nothing but criticize the US, and we fund millions of dollars to them?

Crticize everyone?

or do you just not like the fact that someone is saying we're not perfect... and they happen to be not muslim.

Of course we aren't perfect. But they criticize us to no end. In other words, they go to far.

MGS3_GrayFox wrote:

War Man wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

Probably.

Do the Venezuelens(ans?) hate Hugo, or...?

The people want freedom(there used to be protests but not sure what happened) but there is nothing they can do at the moment.

Actually, the majority of Venezuelanz are happy that Hugo Chavez is in power (see the referendum passed in Bolivia with its leader, and in Venezuela with Hugo).  The majority of people love Hugo Chavez, so you're talking out of your ass.

War Man wrote:

ATG wrote:

I'd install a " Missile Defense System " in Columbia.
Duh.

How about a missile defense system in space? Because we would not only protect ourselves against Venezuela, but also Iran(Obama happens to be against this, douchebag)

The SDI? It was "supposed" to be built during the Cold War, but even a project that magnitude would not be possible still.  And if the US does that, Russia, China, France, India, Pakistan, and the UK would be entitled to do so.  And so would begin the wars at space.

So no, in summary, NO.

Wrong, didn't you see when Chavez started to nationalize everything, people began protesting?

And no, it is possible to have space defenses just need $10,000,000(or is it $10 billion?). And so what if everyone else does so too, their would be a so called "Space War" anyway as China is furthering up its space technology. Did you forget China is working on shooting down space satellites?

The BBCode syntax in the message is incorrect. Missing start tag for quote
.

Well then let me see where the problem is you dumbshit. Fucking quote system

War Man wrote:

FEOS wrote:

UN would shit kittens, since it would violate the NNPT, to which both Russia and Venezuela are signatories.

So...since the UN would be all in a dither...nothing.

UN, do nothing but criticize the US, and we fund millions of dollars to them?

The UN criticises everyone. If you want to be US-centric, I think a more appropriate question would be "Why does the US maintain a costly relationship to an organisation with rules and regulations that they routinely find themselves at odds with?" If you had a legitimate reason to lay down on your back and cry victimisation like you do, I don't think the US would be a part of the UN.

mikkel wrote:

War Man wrote:

FEOS wrote:

UN would shit kittens, since it would violate the NNPT, to which both Russia and Venezuela are signatories.

So...since the UN would be all in a dither...nothing.

UN, do nothing but criticize the US, and we fund millions of dollars to them?

The UN criticises everyone. If you want to be US-centric, I think a more appropriate question would be "Why does the US maintain a costly relationship to an organisation with rules and regulations that they routinely find themselves at odds with?" If you had a legitimate reason to lay down on your back and cry victimisation like you do, I don't think the US would be a part of the UN.

How does the US "cry victimization"?

PureFodder wrote:

He has way higher aproval ratings than Bush does.

Let's not set the bar too high now...

mikkel wrote:

FEOS wrote:

mikkel wrote:

The UN criticises everyone. If you want to be US-centric, I think a more appropriate question would be "Why does the US maintain a costly relationship to an organisation with rules and regulations that they routinely find themselves at odds with?" If you had a legitimate reason to lay down on your back and cry victimisation like you do, I don't think the US would be a part of the UN.

How does the US "cry victimization"?

That was targeted at War Man.

ic. nvm.

i would ask hombre chavez to fire one at Dublin, Ohio and the other at Westminster, California.

War Man wrote:

PureFodder wrote:

War Man wrote:

Wrong, didn't you see when Chavez started to nationalize everything, people began protesting?

Chavez has the highest approval ratings in Latin America. He has way higher aproval ratings than Bush does. He's won multiple elections and polls of the populace show that they predominantly prefer a fairly socialist form of government over a purely capitalist one.

Yeah Latin America(full of socialist dictators), not Venezuela? And also don't I recall hearing about something like "Vote for me or else" from Chavez?

Holy fuck kid, go learn some newspapers.

Name one dictator in Latin America currently in power (dictator, not elected by the people).

And no, you don't recall that (you just pulled it from your ass).

War Man wrote:

PureFodder wrote:

War Man wrote:

Wrong, didn't you see when Chavez started to nationalize everything, people began protesting?

Chavez has the highest approval ratings in Latin America. He has way higher aproval ratings than Bush does. He's won multiple elections and polls of the populace show that they predominantly prefer a fairly socialist form of government over a purely capitalist one.

Yeah Latin America(full of socialist dictators), not Venezuela? And also don't I recall hearing about something like "Vote for me or else" from Chavez?

I'm starting to think you are a piss take alter ego for someone. Either that or you just don't know very much about South American politics.