Pages: 1 2
Uhhhhh ATG, the kid was 20 months old, hardly old enough to drop off at soccer practice.ATG wrote:
I hope they get millions from the red commie bastards that made that piece of shit.
The parents have a right to assume that there will be no fatalities at soccer practice brought on from shoddy equipment.
Geeze dood, there are sane limits to personal responsibility.
Sorry, I missed that part.lowing wrote:
Uhhhhh ATG, the kid was 20 months old, hardly old enough to drop off at soccer practice.ATG wrote:
I hope they get millions from the red commie bastards that made that piece of shit.
The parents have a right to assume that there will be no fatalities at soccer practice brought on from shoddy equipment.
Geeze dood, there are sane limits to personal responsibility.
I can not think of a single time where you are safe to assume your toddler does not need looking after when not in the crib a sleep. I hope you can't either
Now back to the part about who is responsibile for this baby's death? Are you telling me it is some one other than the parents or gaurdian?ATG wrote:
Sorry, I missed that part.lowing wrote:
Uhhhhh ATG, the kid was 20 months old, hardly old enough to drop off at soccer practice.ATG wrote:
I hope they get millions from the red commie bastards that made that piece of shit.
The parents have a right to assume that there will be no fatalities at soccer practice brought on from shoddy equipment.
Geeze dood, there are sane limits to personal responsibility.
I can not think of a single time where you are safe to assume your toddler does not need looking after when not in the crib a sleep. I hope you can't either
The Chicoms should still pay.
yeah euros call it footballGod Save the Queen wrote:
I blame the devil
Yes.lowing wrote:
Now back to the part about who is responsibile for this baby's death? Are you telling me it is some one other than the parents or gaurdian?ATG wrote:
Sorry, I missed that part.lowing wrote:
Uhhhhh ATG, the kid was 20 months old, hardly old enough to drop off at soccer practice.
I can not think of a single time where you are safe to assume your toddler does not need looking after when not in the crib a sleep. I hope you can't either
The Chicoms should still pay.
euros = the devilSEREMAKER wrote:
yeah euros call it footballGod Save the Queen wrote:
I blame the devil
Different issue ATG, and I agree, however, to let a baby play in a net? C'monATG wrote:
Yes.lowing wrote:
Now back to the part about who is responsibile for this baby's death? Are you telling me it is some one other than the parents or gaurdian?ATG wrote:
Sorry, I missed that part.
The Chicoms should still pay.
We are talking about a nation that ships out lead contaminated toys and poison tooth paste.
We should send them some plague infested blankets, like we did to the indians.
Good point and in America? Yes, we would sue the pool maunfacturer. Here in America we have no problem assigning blame for our problems. We find it much easier and profitable to blame someone else for all our woes. Never, NEVER, is anything our own fault.I-=C-A-V-E-M-A-N=-I wrote:
Who'd have thought that a toddler could get themselves killed? Babies know more than we do let them watch us so that we dont get stuck in a net. It's the parent's fault or whoever was watching the child. If someone left a gate to a pool open and a baby drowned in it would you blame the pool manufacturer?
Last edited by Braddock (2008-09-17 07:02:47)
You're either joking, or you've turned clinically insane. Now I don't like your average Chicom either, but they're one of the last guys you can blame this time round. All they were doing is manufacturing the net in accordance to the design details given to them by Mitre, an English company.ATG wrote:
Yes.lowing wrote:
Now back to the part about who is responsibile for this baby's death? Are you telling me it is some one other than the parents or gaurdian?ATG wrote:
Sorry, I missed that part.
The Chicoms should still pay.
We are talking about a nation that ships out lead contaminated toys and poison tooth paste.
We should send them some plague infested blankets, like we did to the indians.
Last edited by Mek-Stizzle (2008-09-17 07:13:18)
My kids nearly 4 and I don't let him out of my sight for a second. Parents lack of responsibility caused this not a net.lowing wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080916/ap_on_re_us/soccer_goal_death_recall
After reading this my first reaction was, Where are the parents??
I can only assume they are getting ready for their lawsuit.
I-=C-A-V-E-M-A-N=-I wrote:
If someone left a gate to a pool open and a baby drowned in it would you blame the pool manufacturer?
cpt.fass1 wrote:
It's defintly personal responsibilty, when a child drowns in a swimming pool does the pool company get sued?
were you supervised playing soccer at 20 months old do ya think?Braddock wrote:
Well if the child was very young then yes the parents are to be blamed for lack of supervision in this case but that doesn't detract from the fact that the nets were badly designed.
I certainly was not supervised every time I played soccer growing up...I mean it's not like it's archery or clay pigeon shooting.
Why should a game legal net be redesigned at the cost of untold millions because parents refuse to watch their kids? Her we go again about who is responsibile for our personal failures. Someone to blame for our own stupidity, it would appear, is easy to find in America.ghettoperson wrote:
What's the big deal here? The parents are clearly at fault, but it's not a bad thing that the company is redesigning the net to stop this happening in future. However no one is being sued here. Until the parents sue, you can probably quit bitching.
Pages: 1 2
