Man, what a debate!
As i posted before.
grrrrr to the mod that deleted my post.
As i posted before.
grrrrr to the mod that deleted my post.
that's so 2005usmarine wrote:
welp. bf2 time. who's comin with?
You have no deleted post in this thread. Are you sure you hit submit?ATG wrote:
Man, what a debate!
As i posted before.
grrrrr to the mod that deleted my post.
got xfire?usmarine wrote:
welp. bf2 time. who's comin with?
Last edited by topal63 (2008-09-27 13:27:58)
It was from my Blackberry sitting on the couch, sometimes it fails.Kmarion wrote:
You have no deleted post in this thread. Are you sure you hit submit?ATG wrote:
Man, what a debate!
As i posted before.
grrrrr to the mod that deleted my post.
The debate was better than I thought it would be. I was predicting a sleeper.
No, so I don't have to look at stupid audience meters and CNN/Fox splashing my screen with irrelevant crap. I actually turned to NBC because it was in highdef. They just had their website at the bottom of the screen. That I can handle.usmarine wrote:
free pr0n?Kmarion wrote:
I’ll watch the debates on C-SPAN. For obvious reasons.
I was watching it on CNN HD. I agree, the audience meter at the bottom and the analyst scoreboards to the right and left were annoying as hell.Kmarion wrote:
A virtual draw for the most part. The only exception I think was the first exchange. McCain appeared nervous and uncertain. I expected the same reaction from Obama on the issues of foreign policy, but that wasn't the case. He spoke specifics and with a sense of determination. I think those "no substance" remarks can safely be put to rest now.
Again it was close. But if I had to pick a victor it would be Obama.No, so I don't have to look at stupid audience meters and CNN/Fox splashing my screen with irrelevant crap. I actually turned to NBC because it was in highdef. They just had their website at the bottom of the screen. That I can handle.usmarine wrote:
free pr0n?Kmarion wrote:
I’ll watch the debates on C-SPAN. For obvious reasons.
Last edited by TheAussieReaper (2008-09-27 00:12:18)
The way in which they wish to pressure Russia. McCain thinks that a global democratic alliance (whatever the hell that means) is a good step to pressure the ME and Russia.Kmarion wrote:
How is Obama's position on Russia different from McCain's?
The McCain alliance was in reference to Iran.TheAussieReaper wrote:
The way in which they wish to pressure Russia. McCain thinks that a global democratic alliance (whatever the hell that means) is a good step to pressure the ME and Russia.
Obama would rather have emerging nations fast tracked into NATO and the UN with help to their economy.
They were virtually identical with their response to Russia. Albeit McCain was trying to spin Obama's words.TheAussieReaper wrote:
The way in which they wish to pressure Russia. McCain thinks that a global democratic alliance (whatever the hell that means) is a good step to pressure the ME and Russia.Kmarion wrote:
How is Obama's position on Russia different from McCain's?
Obama would rather have emerging nations fast tracked into NATO and the UN with help to their economy.
I thought it was a small win for McCain, not the debate... but that he was well rehearsed in his rhetoric and came off as not-really-senile.Reciprocity wrote:
Sen. McCain seemed agitated for most of the debate. His response of "you just don't get it" multiple times made him seem condescending and easily frustrated. And I never heard him answer the question regarding the lessons of Iraq. Obama spoke about the mistake of wreckless and unnecesary wars. McCain spoke about our "victory" in Iraq and about his disagreements with Bush.
I didn't get spent old man, but I did get the crotchety old man. The guy who yells, "get off my lawn, you god damned kids!"Kmarion wrote:
@topal: I was thinking that as well. Those saying that the old man would be too tired to debate properly were way off the mark. He must have doubled up on his metamucil.
Last edited by Reciprocity (2008-09-26 21:04:32)
crowds sitting in little rooms with rheostats in their hands.rdx-fx wrote:
This audience reaction meter.. where the hell are they putting it?! Is it like a turn-your-head-and-cough insertable deal - to get such instantaneous reaction times or what?
It would be funny if they had another room - where they hooked up sensors that measured their sexual arousal level.Reciprocity wrote:
crowds sitting in little rooms with rheostats in their hands.rdx-fx wrote:
This audience reaction meter.. where the hell are they putting it?! Is it like a turn-your-head-and-cough insertable deal - to get such instantaneous reaction times or what?
Last edited by topal63 (2008-09-26 21:21:51)