VicktorVauhn
Member
+319|6844|Southern California

Ryan wrote:

VicktorVauhn wrote:

Why not? It will work plenty fine I promise. That's just a stupid rule to annoy students in basic math classes. Once your past Algebra class no one gives a damn.
I'm not in a 'basic' math class. I'm in grade 11, so I'm in Math 20 Pure Advanced. I'm taking 30 level math next semester.
Sorry man, but algebra class = basic math. That's trying to say "ohh Ive done _____" its just what that group of math classes is referred to.
Its a term referring to the fact that it is the basis of what pretty much all other maths use not a statement of its difficulty.


But as a comment on how hard or complex it is, its really really basic... and low level math

Last edited by VicktorVauhn (2008-10-16 18:18:12)

nukchebi0
Пушкин, наше всё
+387|6775|New Haven, CT

VicktorVauhn wrote:

Hurricane2k9 wrote:

VicktorVauhn wrote:


why the fuck would you square both sides when x isn't even under a radical? square root of 3 is just a number like anything else, if this was 5x = x-4 would you square it?
x*sqrt(3)=x-4
x*sqrt(3) -x=-4
x*(sqrt(3)-1)=-4
x=-4/(sqrt(3)-1)
done. Don't need quadratic formula and squaring stuff...Its really basic algebra...
what happened to the other X? it magically turned into a -1?
You guys make my head hurt x(sqrt(3)-1) is x*(sqrt(3)-x, x times -1 = -x
google distributive property.

This is seriously like algebra 1
Your notation didn't help anyone see that.
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7217|Cambridge (UK)

nukchebi0 wrote:

VicktorVauhn wrote:

Hurricane2k9 wrote:


what happened to the other X? it magically turned into a -1?
You guys make my head hurt x(sqrt(3)-1) is x*(sqrt(3)-x, x times -1 = -x
google distributive property.

This is seriously like algebra 1
Your notation didn't help anyone see that.
Looks pretty clear to me.
VicktorVauhn
Member
+319|6844|Southern California

nukchebi0 wrote:

VicktorVauhn wrote:

Hurricane2k9 wrote:


what happened to the other X? it magically turned into a -1?
You guys make my head hurt x(sqrt(3)-1) is x*(sqrt(3)-x, x times -1 = -x
google distributive property.

This is seriously like algebra 1
Your notation didn't help anyone see that.
Its fairly obvious, and my computer doesn't have a square root key. I explained it in words in my previous post, it basic math, and that is the way square root is typed out if you don't have the use of symbols. I am sorry you are confused by parenthesis, when you see a number on the outside of them and an equation on the inside it means you multiply each term of the equation on the inside by the number on the outside.
mcminty
Moderating your content for the Australian Govt.
+879|7173|Sydney, Australia

VicktorVauhn wrote:

I am sorry you are confused by parenthesis, when you see a number on the outside of them and an equation expression on the inside it means you multiply each term of the equation expression on the inside by the number on the outside.
Fixed

Edit: How did this get on to the distributive law...?
VicktorVauhn
Member
+319|6844|Southern California

mcminty wrote:

VicktorVauhn wrote:

I am sorry you are confused by parenthesis, when you see a number on the outside of them and an equation expression on the inside it means you multiply each term of the equation expression on the inside by the number on the outside.
Fixed

Edit: How did this get on to the distributive law...?
Hurricane asked what happened to the second X when I factored it out, so I told him to look up law of distribution to see how -1 would become x....

contrary to popular belief memorizing the difference between equations and expressions and other random vocab will not help you do math... To many people focus on memorizing rules and laws rather then just understanding what is going on. I have never been big on memorizing more then is necessary.
mcminty
Moderating your content for the Australian Govt.
+879|7173|Sydney, Australia

Ryan wrote:

x√3 = x-4

How do I get x?
Maybe this notation is a little clearer...

x.√3 - x = -4

x.(√3-1) = -4

x = -4/(√3-1)
mcminty
Moderating your content for the Australian Govt.
+879|7173|Sydney, Australia

VicktorVauhn wrote:

Hurricane asked what happened to the second X when I factored it out, so I told him to look up law of distribution to see how -1 would become x....

contrary to popular belief memorizing the difference between equations and expressions and other random vocab will not help you do math... To many people focus on memorizing rules and laws rather then just understanding what is going on. I have never been big on memorizing more then is necessary.
Ah ok,


And so memorising (or just 'knowing', as I know what they are...) Rank, Kernel, Image and Nullity won't help me in my algebra test this afternoon?
nukchebi0
Пушкин, наше всё
+387|6775|New Haven, CT

VicktorVauhn wrote:

nukchebi0 wrote:

VicktorVauhn wrote:


You guys make my head hurt x(sqrt(3)-1) is x*(sqrt(3)-x, x times -1 = -x
google distributive property.

This is seriously like algebra 1
Your notation didn't help anyone see that.
Its fairly obvious, and my computer doesn't have a square root key. I explained it in words in my previous post, it basic math, and that is the way square root is typed out if you don't have the use of symbols.
I was talking about the notation where you kept the '*' after you had factored out the x-squared. It was difficult to see the parenthesis, and thus that you had factored.

I am sorry you are confused by parenthesis, when you see a number on the outside of them and an equation on the inside it means you multiply each term of the equation on the inside by the number on the outside.
Wow, thanks for the math lesson, professor. I'm struggling through algebra this year, and your brilliance just shines through the cloud that is the complicated concepts. Really, stop being so arrogant. You aren't smarter than anyone else, even if your misguided mind wants it to be so. I know how to do math; don't be so ignorant. It just makes you look pathetic and desperate for attention.
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7217|Cambridge (UK)

mcminty wrote:

Ryan wrote:

x√3 = x-4

How do I get x?
Maybe this notation is a little clearer...

x.√3 - x = -4

x.(√3-1) = -4

x = -4/(√3-1)
If anything it's less clear.

Is "√3-1" "the square root of 3, minus 1" or "the square root of 3-minus-1"?
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7217|Cambridge (UK)

mcminty wrote:

VicktorVauhn wrote:

Hurricane asked what happened to the second X when I factored it out, so I told him to look up law of distribution to see how -1 would become x....

contrary to popular belief memorizing the difference between equations and expressions and other random vocab will not help you do math... To many people focus on memorizing rules and laws rather then just understanding what is going on. I have never been big on memorizing more then is necessary.
Ah ok,


And so memorising (or just 'knowing', as I know what they are...) Rank, Kernel, Image and Nullity won't help me in my algebra test this afternoon?
It may help you pass the test, but will it help you understand the subject?
VicktorVauhn
Member
+319|6844|Southern California

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

mcminty wrote:

VicktorVauhn wrote:

Hurricane asked what happened to the second X when I factored it out, so I told him to look up law of distribution to see how -1 would become x....

contrary to popular belief memorizing the difference between equations and expressions and other random vocab will not help you do math... To many people focus on memorizing rules and laws rather then just understanding what is going on. I have never been big on memorizing more then is necessary.
Ah ok,


And so memorising (or just 'knowing', as I know what they are...) Rank, Kernel, Image and Nullity won't help me in my algebra test this afternoon?
It may help you pass the test, but will it help you understand the subject?
Bingo, and unless for some reason your teacher feels like specifically quizzing you on their meanings you can do math just fine with out knowing any of those words.



nukchebi0 wrote:

I am sorry you are confused by parenthesis, when you see a number on the outside of them and an equation on the inside it means you multiply each term of the equation on the inside by the number on the outside.
Wow, thanks for the math lesson, professor. I'm struggling through algebra this year, and your brilliance just shines through the cloud that is the complicated concepts. Really, stop being so arrogant. You aren't smarter than anyone else, even if your misguided mind wants it to be so. I know how to do math; don't be so ignorant. It just makes you look pathetic and desperate for attention.
I am definitely smarter then some in here, lol... but that doesn't mean much, your smarter then some in here too... Its not like we are all exactly equal and I am pretty sure I am not at the bottom. Not that I ever mentioned anything about being smarter then others in here.
Honestly though if you understand and already knew what I explained then what I wrote really isn't difficult to read, If you are having trouble with it you made a mistake, or don't understand. If you don't understand I explained, if you made a mistake... hell it happens, but that is your mistake and nothing to do with my statement.
Ryan
Member
+1,230|7295|Alberta, Canada

mcminty wrote:

Ryan wrote:

x√3 = x-4

How do I get x?
Maybe this notation is a little clearer...

x.√3 - x = -4

x.(√3-1) = -4

x = -4/(√3-1)
Then rationalize the denominator so you get x = -2√3/1
Ender2309
has joined the GOP
+470|7022|USA

Ryan wrote:

mcminty wrote:

Ryan wrote:

x√3 = x-4

How do I get x?
Maybe this notation is a little clearer...

x.√3 - x = -4

x.(√3-1) = -4

x = -4/(√3-1)
Then rationalize the denominator so you get x = -2√3/1
really, like somebody else said (i think it was victorvaughn), rationalizing the denominator is a waste of a step and just another potential for error. when you get past trig nobody cares anymore.

edit: according to this bad boy, you're in algebra 2. maybe. i estimated myself to a 44.

Last edited by Ender2309 (2008-10-16 22:54:27)

Beduin
Compensation of Reactive Power in the grid
+510|6202|شمال
lol lol lol
الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic
mcminty
Moderating your content for the Australian Govt.
+879|7173|Sydney, Australia

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

"the square root of 3-minus-1"?
also commonly known as √2...
mcminty
Moderating your content for the Australian Govt.
+879|7173|Sydney, Australia

VicktorVauhn wrote:

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

It may help you pass the test, but will it help you understand the subject?
Bingo, and unless for some reason your teacher feels like specifically quizzing you on their meanings you can do math just fine with out knowing any of those words.
Well I was asked to find the Rank and Nullity of "matrix A", so yes... the meanings of these words were essential. Not only would I not be able to do the tests, but without knowing those terms (amongst others) I would have little understanding of Linear Transformations...
VicktorVauhn
Member
+319|6844|Southern California
again that's passing a test. The people invented those terms did it all with out having an actual name for it. Math isn't really a vocab type of thing... there is plenty of vocab surrounding it but in the end the words are just representations of concepts... you can memorize all the fancy words you want but you wont be able to really do anything unless you understand the concept itself.

Conversely, you can ignore all the math speak and just learn concepts and still be able to apply them perfectly well. The vocab is only really worth while when your talking about math for math's sake... when it comes time to apply it all and actually get any use out of it the words themselves are pretty meaningless and wont help you with much.

That is what me and Scorpion mean.
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7217|Cambridge (UK)

mcminty wrote:

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

"the square root of 3-minus-1"?
also commonly known as √2...
Exactly.
bad-man
now say you sorry
+34|6299|one windy city
and the answer  is -40°c +33" long penis and a mind controlled mouse..... who cares
Ryan
Member
+1,230|7295|Alberta, Canada

Ender2309 wrote:

Ryan wrote:

mcminty wrote:


Maybe this notation is a little clearer...

x.√3 - x = -4

x.(√3-1) = -4

x = -4/(√3-1)
Then rationalize the denominator so you get x = -2√3/1
really, like somebody else said (i think it was victorvaughn), rationalizing the denominator is a waste of a step and just another potential for error. when you get past trig nobody cares anymore.

edit: according to this bad boy, you're in algebra 2. maybe. i estimated myself to a 44.
I have to rationalize the denominator in my final answer or else I get it wrong.
Defiance
Member
+438|7123

bad-man wrote:

and the answer  is -40°c +33" long penis and a mind controlled mouse..... who cares
The people that value some kind of coherence.
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7217|Cambridge (UK)

bad-man wrote:

and the answer  is -40°c +33" long penis and a mind controlled mouse..... who cares
please show your working out.

mcminty
Moderating your content for the Australian Govt.
+879|7173|Sydney, Australia

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

mcminty wrote:

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

"the square root of 3-minus-1"?
also commonly known as √2...
Exactly.
How can you say "exactly" to that??

If I had written √3-1 as meaning the "square root of 3-minus-1", then I would have written √2. So I must have meant "the square root of 3, minus 1".


How is that confusing at all?
aj0404
It'll just be our little secret
+298|6801|Iowa...
i think we should stop arguing about math...

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard