God Save the Queen
Banned
+628|6761|tropical regions of london
skewed and fluffed. lame dude.
Yellowman03
Once Again, We Meet at Last
+108|6653|Texas

God Save the Queen wrote:

skewed and fluffed. lame dude.
Bill O'Reilly? Skewed...Hell Yes. Fluff...not so much. He's my hero. I like to shout like him when I debate my friends. It makes me feel manly and correct.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7019|132 and Bush

Iran is definitely voting Obama.

Speaker of Iranian parliament

    “We are leaning more in favor of Barack Obama because he is more flexible and rational, even though we know American policy will not change that much,” Larijani said at a press conference during a visit to Bahrain…

    Larijani, a leading figure in the conservative camp in Iran, also said the United States was too busy dealing with the global financial crisis to consider waging an attack on Iran.

    “The risk was low before,” he said. “But now I am 100% certain that the United States will not unleash a war against Iran. The economic crisis has cost the United States $1.4 trillion and Washington is working to resolve its internal problems and not a war.”
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340 … 40,00.html
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7184|Cambridge (UK)
"Just a bit of fun" (name that quote).

I love elections.
Reciprocity
Member
+721|6999|the dank(super) side of Oregon
Speaker of Iranian parliament

  “The risk was low before,” he said. “But now I am 100% certain that the United States will not unleash a war against Iran. The economic crisis has cost the United States $1.4 trillion and Washington is working to resolve its internal problems and not a war.”
This "global economic crisis" is only a ruse, meant to lull Iran into a false sense of security.


[impression=Montgomery Burns]Excellent.  My plan is working perfectly. [/impression]
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|7093|Canberra, AUS
Interesting... but clearly inaccurate. 80% Obama in the US? Lol.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7019|132 and Bush

Reciprocity wrote:

Speaker of Iranian parliament

  “The risk was low before,” he said. “But now I am 100% certain that the United States will not unleash a war against Iran. The economic crisis has cost the United States $1.4 trillion and Washington is working to resolve its internal problems and not a war.”
This "global economic crisis" is only a ruse, meant to lull Iran into a false sense of security.


[impression=Montgomery Burns]Excellent.  My plan is working perfectly. [/impression]
I was 100% certain b4. It will of course be Israel hitting Iran.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6571|what

Kmarion wrote:

I was 100% certain b4. It will of course be Israel hitting Iran.
Pre-emptive strikes, is there any other kind?
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7019|132 and Bush

TheAussieReaper wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

I was 100% certain b4. It will of course be Israel hitting Iran.
Pre-emptive strikes, is there any other kind?
Yes, it's that decision you making after looking out over a mushroom horizon.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
The A W S M F O X
I Won't Deny It
+172|6102|SQUID

Spark wrote:

Interesting... but clearly inaccurate. 80% Obama in the US? Lol.
ahahahahha
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|7093|Canberra, AUS

Yellowman03 wrote:

God Save the Queen wrote:

skewed and fluffed. lame dude.
Bill O'Reilly? Skewed...Hell Yes. Fluff...not so much. He's my hero. I like to shout like him when I debate my friends. It makes me feel manly and correct.
Is this some kind of CyrusTheVirus-esque thing?
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
imortal
Member
+240|7083|Austin, TX

God Save the Queen wrote:

Yellowman03 wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:


When was this?
Before the old writers either died or got replaced. The magazine wanted to appeal to more people, so they made their views more moderate. I hope Fox News never changes.
you admit you like recieving your information skewed to one side?
it is going to be skewed one way or the other.  Noone is neutral.  No one.  It is just that Fox is the only one that leans even a little bit right.
JahManRed
wank
+646|7046|IRELAND

Kmarion wrote:

Iran is definitely voting Obama.

Speaker of Iranian parliament

    “We are leaning more in favor of Barack Obama because he is more flexible and rational, even though we know American policy will not change that much,” Larijani said at a press conference during a visit to Bahrain…

    Larijani, a leading figure in the conservative camp in Iran, also said the United States was too busy dealing with the global financial crisis to consider waging an attack on Iran.

    “The risk was low before,” he said. “But now I am 100% certain that the United States will not unleash a war against Iran. The economic crisis has cost the United States $1.4 trillion and Washington is working to resolve its internal problems and not a war.”
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340 … 40,00.html
Further proof he's a Muslim terrorist


Looks like the world is voting Obama. Obama promises change, the world sees McCain as more of the Bush. The global community has no love for a Republican led USA with the Neo Con New World Order a priority.
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6829|'Murka

JahManRed wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

Iran is definitely voting Obama.

Speaker of Iranian parliament

    “We are leaning more in favor of Barack Obama because he is more flexible and rational, even though we know American policy will not change that much,” Larijani said at a press conference during a visit to Bahrain…

    Larijani, a leading figure in the conservative camp in Iran, also said the United States was too busy dealing with the global financial crisis to consider waging an attack on Iran.

    “The risk was low before,” he said. “But now I am 100% certain that the United States will not unleash a war against Iran. The economic crisis has cost the United States $1.4 trillion and Washington is working to resolve its internal problems and not a war.”
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340 … 40,00.html
Further proof he's a Muslim terrorist


Looks like the world is voting Obama. Obama promises change, the world sees McCain as more of the Bush. The global community has no love for a Republican led USA with the Neo Con New World Order a priority.
Pretty sure the world is NOT voting Obama. Nor is the world voting (or not voting) McCain.

The flaws in that map have been pointed out rather dramatically as having no foundation in fact.

Plus there's the whole thing about it being a US-only election...
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
JahManRed
wank
+646|7046|IRELAND

FEOS wrote:

JahManRed wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

Iran is definitely voting Obama.


http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340 … 40,00.html
Further proof he's a Muslim terrorist


Looks like the world is voting Obama. Obama promises change, the world sees McCain as more of the Bush. The global community has no love for a Republican led USA with the Neo Con New World Order a priority.
Pretty sure the world is NOT voting Obama. Nor is the world voting (or not voting) McCain.

The flaws in that map have been pointed out rather dramatically as having no foundation in fact.

Plus there's the whole thing about it being a US-only election...
Yes, I think we grasped the fact that the rest of the world can't vote. jeeeeeze. Its hypothetical. I can only talk for Ireland & UK. Everyone I have talked to on the subject wants to see Obama win as they disagree with US policies and want to see a change. As a marker of world opinion goes id say its reasonably accurate. That's all it is tho. Opinion.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6973

FEOS wrote:

Pretty sure the world is NOT voting Obama. Nor is the world voting (or not voting) McCain.

The flaws in that map have been pointed out rather dramatically as having no foundation in fact.
So you believe that the rest of the world prefers a Republican over Obama???

Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-10-23 05:39:25)

lowing
Banned
+1,662|7069|USA

CameronPoe wrote:

This interesting exercise by right-wing magazine 'The Economist' demonstrates how the world feels about America and in particular about American Republicans:

http://www.economist.com/vote2008/

Strangely Cuba is 'Leaning McCain'... and what about the 'Democratic' Republic of Congo, eh?
Is it so surprising? In true socialist/liberal fashion, America has something you all want, so who better to "spread the wealth" than to vote for Obama?
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6973

lowing wrote:

Is it so surprising? In true socialist/liberal fashion, America has something you all want, so who better to "spread the wealth" than to vote for Obama?
lol. You are hilarious.
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|7039|London, England
Am I the only one that can't seem to find what the fuck Cam is talking about, he just posted a link to the page and now expects me to find the specific article

Damnit

This, I don't need.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7069|USA

CameronPoe wrote:

lowing wrote:

Is it so surprising? In true socialist/liberal fashion, America has something you all want, so who better to "spread the wealth" than to vote for Obama?
lol. You are hilarious.
Thanks Cam, I appreciate that.
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|7039|London, England
Nevermind, you have to use IE6
Flaming_Maniac
prince of insufficient light
+2,490|7125|67.222.138.85

CameronPoe wrote:

lowing wrote:

Is it so surprising? In true socialist/liberal fashion, America has something you all want, so who better to "spread the wealth" than to vote for Obama?
lol. You are hilarious.
and yet....

Your response?
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|7039|London, England
IE sucks.

I think the main two reasons the rest of the world would rather have someone like Obama, is that his regime is more likely to make the US economy better, which in turn means everything goes down nicely for everyone else, and that he's also less likely (only just, he is still an American afterall) to start a stupid war. Which always messes up things somehow for everyone, for the most part (unless it's some random African/Latin American country)
tupla_s
.
+455|7010|Finland
Here's another one that seems to have more votes
http://www.iftheworldcouldvote.com/results
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6973

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

lowing wrote:

Is it so surprising? In true socialist/liberal fashion, America has something you all want, so who better to "spread the wealth" than to vote for Obama?
lol. You are hilarious.
and yet....

Your response?
My response is that his claim is ridiculous. The entire world is facing global meltdown primarily down to excessively right-wing irresponsible fiscal and regulatory policy on Wall Street. Global terrorism has skyrocketed under Republican administrations. The rest of the world sells America their shit: America plummeting headlong into further disarray and alienating more and more pivotal nations worldwide benefits no-one. Ergo we want a non-Republican seemingly sensible, fiscally responsible, conciliatory and constructive person in the white house to bring America out of the shit and reintegrate it into the international community. Obama is the lesser of two evils - he is the only possibility of achieving this.

Not to mention that if McCain carks it America would be led by a dumb evangelical hick who would probably seek to expedite 'the Rapture'.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-10-23 06:02:16)

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard