This might be a stupid question,but in what resolution do you guys run your tests??
Default settings. Aka 1280x1024Negerkungen wrote:
This might be a stupid question,but in what resolution do you guys run your tests??
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
ahh ok thx
Oh. Disqualified. the test must be run at default settings. Yours was @ 1024x768.
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
2154 3DMarks
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=8378157
My 1950 pro died so this is with my old x800xt
edit- With 1950 pro
4231 3DMarks
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=7275801
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=8378157
My 1950 pro died so this is with my old x800xt
edit- With 1950 pro
4231 3DMarks
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=7275801
Last edited by CC-Marley (2008-11-03 13:28:06)
thats what my crappy 15 inch Sony CPD-L150 runs at sorry & it says nothing about that in the rules tbh.DeathUnlimited wrote:
Oh. Disqualified. the test must be run at default settings. Yours was @ 1024x768.
Quote of the year so far "Fifa 11 on the other hand... shiny things for mongos "-mtb0minime
smuder201 wrote:
thats what my crappy 15 inch Sony CPD-L150 runs at sorry & it says nothing about that in the rules tbh.DeathUnlimited wrote:
Oh. Disqualified. the test must be run at default settings. Yours was @ 1024x768.
Default settings = 1280x1024.DeathUnlimited wrote:
Rules
- The test must be run at default settings.
18,075
E8400 @ 4.050 Ghz, x2 8800GTS 512 @ 700/1000. Not at home right now, I'll edit in shaders when I am.
Btw, the display drivers do not have to be WHQL verified? Mine were beta at the time of testing.
E8400 @ 4.050 Ghz, x2 8800GTS 512 @ 700/1000. Not at home right now, I'll edit in shaders when I am.
Btw, the display drivers do not have to be WHQL verified? Mine were beta at the time of testing.
Last edited by The_Sniper_NM (2008-11-03 14:32:26)
I thought EVGA can do betterThe_Sniper_NM wrote:
18,075
E8400 @ 4.050 Ghz, x2 8800GTS 512 @ 700/1000. Not at home right now, I'll edit in shaders when I am.
Btw, the display drivers do not have to be WHQL verified? Mine were beta at the time of testing.
I can't register my 3dmark06 either,so I just took a SS instead.
Meh, Didn't jump on the GTX series band wagon. Probably wont upgrade my GFX until a nehalem die shrink..Sup wrote:
I thought EVGA can do betterThe_Sniper_NM wrote:
18,075
E8400 @ 4.050 Ghz, x2 8800GTS 512 @ 700/1000. Not at home right now, I'll edit in shaders when I am.
Btw, the display drivers do not have to be WHQL verified? Mine were beta at the time of testing.
So not GTX GFX this year ha?The_Sniper_NM wrote:
Meh, Didn't jump on the GTX series band wagon. Probably wont upgrade my GFX until a nehalem die shrink..Sup wrote:
I thought EVGA can do betterThe_Sniper_NM wrote:
18,075
E8400 @ 4.050 Ghz, x2 8800GTS 512 @ 700/1000. Not at home right now, I'll edit in shaders when I am.
Btw, the display drivers do not have to be WHQL verified? Mine were beta at the time of testing.
Don't have the heart to put my GTS's in retirement yet..Sup wrote:
So not GTX GFX this year ha?The_Sniper_NM wrote:
Meh, Didn't jump on the GTX series band wagon. Probably wont upgrade my GFX until a nehalem die shrink..Sup wrote:
I thought EVGA can do better
Replace them with two GTX280's?The_Sniper_NM wrote:
Don't have the heart to put my GTS's in retirement yet..Sup wrote:
So not GTX GFX this year ha?The_Sniper_NM wrote:
Meh, Didn't jump on the GTX series band wagon. Probably wont upgrade my GFX until a nehalem die shrink.
He says hes not upgrading to GTX which I think is the right decision.CrazeD wrote:
Replace them with two GTX280's?The_Sniper_NM wrote:
Don't have the heart to put my GTS's in retirement yet..Sup wrote:
So not GTX GFX this year ha?
He didn't add my score, so GL.Negerkungen wrote:
I can't register my 3dmark06 either,so I just took a SS instead.
http://img505.imageshack.us/img505/2838/ssshe4.th.jpg
I know I wont get it addedphishman420 wrote:
He didn't add my score, so GL.Negerkungen wrote:
I can't register my 3dmark06 either,so I just took a SS instead.
http://img505.imageshack.us/img505/2838/ssshe4.th.jpg
Photoshopping 3DMark scores FTW.Negerkungen wrote:
I know I wont get it addedphishman420 wrote:
He didn't add my score, so GL.Negerkungen wrote:
I can't register my 3dmark06 either,so I just took a SS instead.
http://img505.imageshack.us/img505/2838/ssshe4.th.jpg
phishman420 wrote:
Photoshopping 3DMark scores FTW.Negerkungen wrote:
I know I wont get it addedphishman420 wrote:
He didn't add my score, so GL.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
How come I get lower 3Dmarks then Negerkungen?
You need the latest version of 3DMark.Moist.Niek wrote:
http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/281/3dmark06lz7.jpg
How come I get lower 3Dmarks then Negerkungen?
How hard can it be?
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
So, I got 9850 at 2.92GHz.CrazeD wrote:
I'm gonna do a suicide run later, see if I can top 10000.
Gr.
Moar powaaa
Clock that GPUCrazeD wrote:
So, I got 9850 at 2.92GHz.CrazeD wrote:
I'm gonna do a suicide run later, see if I can top 10000.
Gr.
Moar powaaa
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
Runnin stock cooler, it gets toasty.DeathUnlimited wrote:
Clock that GPUCrazeD wrote:
So, I got 9850 at 2.92GHz.CrazeD wrote:
I'm gonna do a suicide run later, see if I can top 10000.
Gr.
Moar powaaa
I OC'ed it a little bit, but it was running hot so I didn't want to go any higher. Maybe when a get a better cooler...
Anyway, I made it to 9947 @ 649/1010, she was runnin 70*C at idle so I figured I'd stop there...
http://service.futuremark.com/resultAna … ultType=14
4850?CrazeD wrote:
Runnin stock cooler, it gets toasty.DeathUnlimited wrote:
Clock that GPUCrazeD wrote:
So, I got 9850 at 2.92GHz.
Gr.
Moar powaaa
I OC'ed it a little bit, but it was running hot so I didn't want to go any higher. Maybe when a get a better cooler...
Anyway, I made it to 9947 @ 649/1010, she was runnin 70*C at idle so I figured I'd stop there...
http://service.futuremark.com/resultAna … ultType=14
It can do it fine at 90 tbh. BUST THAT 10K GO
Besides you can manually set the fan speed to 100 and then it shouldn't get to 70C even.
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg