Virginia Tech beats the filthy UVA Cavaliers, and Georgia Tech beats UGA
win amirite?
win amirite?
college football *yawn*
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
I went to my College Open Day today. Provided some interesting points.
No, not win.
Oklahoma beat Oklahoma State, win indeed.
USc raeps
No, the Ducks kicked the Beavers ass tonight.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Florida - 55MadKatter wrote:
www.45-35.com
Texas - 20
zzz
Wishful thinking anyway. Did you see how many point Texas Tech and OU scored against us? They're the leading offenses in the nation. Doubtful any SEC team could top that.phishman420 wrote:
Florida - 55MadKatter wrote:
www.45-35.com
Texas - 20
We shall see.
-TL- wrote:
Oklahoma beat Oklahoma State, win indeed.
How 'bout .935 - .922?MadKatter wrote:
www.45-35.com
That's fucking bullshit, and you know it. Enjoy getting ass-rammed by Florida.-TL- wrote:
How 'bout .935 - .922?MadKatter wrote:
www.45-35.com
They don't play proper football in America
Hides
Hides
How about we "reason", shall we?-TL- wrote:
How 'bout .935 - .922?MadKatter wrote:
www.45-35.com
Oklahoma loses at a neutral site by 10 points. Plays a good game.
Tech loses by a fuckload and shouldn't even be considered.
Texas loses away by 5 points. Didn't even show up till halfway through the 3rd quarter.
Winner - Texas, easily. They had a shitty game and still almost beat the then-number 5 team.
October 11th, 2008. Red River Shootout. Both teams play very well, Texas trails the whole game and emerges at the end. Wins by 10 points at a neutral ground.
Winner - Texas.
Amirite? But wait! These are POLLSTERS we're talking about. Dumbfucks who probably can't remember what they ate for breakfast. To them, it's all about what happened last week. They have the attention span of a fish.
Oklahoma loses nearly 2 months ago
Texas loses about a month ago
Tech loses 2? weeks ago
therefore
OU > UT > TTECH because OU lost earlier on.
Right? Beating a team, head-to-head, on a neutral field means nothing.
I pretty much agree with your logic, and a reminder to those who don't know how the BCS system works, we have three questionable polls:MadKatter wrote:
How about we "reason", shall we?-TL- wrote:
How 'bout .935 - .922?MadKatter wrote:
www.45-35.com
Oklahoma loses at a neutral site by 10 points. Plays a good game.
Tech loses by a fuckload and shouldn't even be considered.
Texas loses away by 5 points. Didn't even show up till halfway through the 3rd quarter.
Winner - Texas, easily. They had a shitty game and still almost beat the then-number 5 team.
October 11th, 2008. Red River Shootout. Both teams play very well, Texas trails the whole game and emerges at the end. Wins by 10 points at a neutral ground.
Winner - Texas.
Amirite? But wait! These are POLLSTERS we're talking about. Dumbfucks who probably can't remember what they ate for breakfast. To them, it's all about what happened last week. They have the attention span of a fish.
Oklahoma loses nearly 2 months ago
Texas loses about a month ago
Tech loses 2? weeks ago
therefore
OU > UT > TTECH because OU lost earlier on.
Right? Beating a team, head-to-head, on a neutral field means nothing.
The coaches - Politics, politics, and more politics. They can't really shaft a team when they have the record, but when it's close it comes down not to who is the better team or who won head to head, but who they like more
The Harris: A bunch of random people who are or were some how involved in college football. No real qualification other than to some how be around the game.
The computers: Supposedly based on a scientific formula, which is why there's seven of them, running the same formula, with the same teams, and getting different results. Apparently they love blow outs and defense doesn't count for much.
Not when you lose to a team that the other team annihilated...Right? Beating a team, head-to-head, on a neutral field means nothing.
Texas lost to TT on a last second miracle TD away from home. Texas soundly beat Oklahoma on a neutral site. Oklahoma beat TT at home. Therefore, Texas > OU.nukchebi0 wrote:
Not when you lose to a team that the other team annihilated...Right? Beating a team, head-to-head, on a neutral field means nothing.
38 - 3 USC pwned Dame in zi ass
Everybody USC plays is bad.
which is fitting cause USC is gaySealXo wrote:
38 - 3 USC pwned Dame in zi ass
Let me put it this way - if Gideon caught that ball (for those of you who don't know, one of our freshman safeties had an opportunity to intercept a tipped ball to end the game)(He went to my highschool, hope it doesn't wreck his career, he might go pro...), we would have won the game.nukchebi0 wrote:
Not when you lose to a team that the other team annihilated...Right? Beating a team, head-to-head, on a neutral field means nothing.
We would be 12-0 right now, an UNQUESTIONABLE #1 team. Nobody would bat an eye.
The way I see it, Oklahoma losing convincingly (they played a damn good game) to UT by 10 points hurts their BCS rank less than a freshman safety dropping a tip. I'm not making excuses or anything, but that's fucked up.
8 team playoff. It would be epic, TV ratings would be off the charts. The sheer amount of profitability should be enough to change the current shit system.