BASTARD.Sup wrote:
Don't flame but I was actually cheering for HD-DVD to win over Bluray.
*goes to find overused images of flamesage*
*goes to find overused images of flamesage*
sorry, my too. i didn't really know much about either though and still don't. i just liked the name better - Blu-Ray sounds like "aw, we're so fucking cool we have an awesome name for it but it's really just HD"Bell wrote:
BASTARD.Sup wrote:
Don't flame but I was actually cheering for HD-DVD to win over Bluray.
*goes to find overused images of flamesage*
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
Cos I didn't want Sony to win and monopolize the market even more.DeathUnlimited wrote:
Wy so sup?
I have the 9800GT, I'm guessing the statistics for my card doesn't differ much from the 8800GT?
Prolly not. Same card, nicer looking sticker, higher priceTopHat01 wrote:
I have the 9800GT, I'm guessing the statistics for my card doesn't differ much from the 8800GT?
That, and it's a different NM size too. Bigger e-penis too, "I have a 9-series card".Sup wrote:
Prolly not. Same card, nicer looking sticker, higher priceTopHat01 wrote:
I have the 9800GT, I'm guessing the statistics for my card doesn't differ much from the 8800GT?
Sometimes less is moreTopHat01 wrote:
That, and it's a different NM size too. Bigger e-penis too, "I have a 9-series card".Sup wrote:
Prolly not. Same card, nicer looking sticker, higher priceTopHat01 wrote:
I have the 9800GT, I'm guessing the statistics for my card doesn't differ much from the 8800GT?
Some early stuff, may be susipicious, though: http://www.techpowerup.com/79027/Prelim … 70_X2.html
Check www.engadget.com for the original article.
If that's true, it looks fucking bad-ass.
So long ATI, possibly.
Check www.engadget.com for the original article.
If that's true, it looks fucking bad-ass.
So long ATI, possibly.
You think ATI is just going to sit on their ass? Nah. nVidia's releases are always widely publicized to draw the spotlight from ATI. That's what they're doing.FFLink13 wrote:
Some early stuff, may be susipicious, though: http://www.techpowerup.com/79027/Prelim … 70_X2.html
Check www.engadget.com for the original article.
If that's true, it looks fucking bad-ass.
So long ATI, possibly.
Dead Space is also a nVidia-dominated game AFAIK. Some games are just better played on green hardware than red - like Crysis.
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
Which is exactly why Nvidia helps design games with creators...haffeysucks wrote:
You think ATI is just going to sit on their ass? Nah. nVidia's releases are always widely publicized to draw the spotlight from ATI. That's what they're doing.FFLink13 wrote:
Some early stuff, may be susipicious, though: http://www.techpowerup.com/79027/Prelim … 70_X2.html
Check www.engadget.com for the original article.
If that's true, it looks fucking bad-ass.
So long ATI, possibly.
Dead Space is also a nVidia-dominated game AFAIK. Some games are just better played on green hardware than red - like Crysis.
it's a result OF their dominance for so long. now that ATi turned the tables a bit, (hopefully) more developers will work with them as they did with the powerhouse of last generation, Nvidia.The_Sniper_NM wrote:
Which is exactly why Nvidia helps design games with creators...haffeysucks wrote:
You think ATI is just going to sit on their ass? Nah. nVidia's releases are always widely publicized to draw the spotlight from ATI. That's what they're doing.FFLink13 wrote:
Some early stuff, may be susipicious, though: http://www.techpowerup.com/79027/Prelim … 70_X2.html
Check www.engadget.com for the original article.
If that's true, it looks fucking bad-ass.
So long ATI, possibly.
Dead Space is also a nVidia-dominated game AFAIK. Some games are just better played on green hardware than red - like Crysis.
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
The company is proactive about the development, almost like advertising.
They litterally bribe developers to code games to work better for them. Example of that is they litterally paid of the likes of assasins creed developers not to bring in dx10.1.The_Sniper_NM wrote:
The company is proactive about the development, almost like advertising.
Edit: $500? Ooo hell yes I will get my pre order in as soon as xD
Last edited by Bell (2008-12-18 06:45:20)
/wantsFFLink13 wrote:
W00t: http://www.guru3d.com/article/geforce-gtx-295-preview/
once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.
Well I'm impressed, but I think it's a bit late for it to be coming out. Like Haffey says, ATI will bring out something better soon and lead the way again, I reckon and NVIDIA won't have anything to compete with it for ages.
It looks awesome. It's so fucking huge.
That's what I would call awsome. I can't wait to see how uber fast the GT300 will be. I hope it will be released around March when I make my gfx card shopping
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
hmmm, £400x 4 + £209 + £200 =
£400 x 4?twoblacklines wrote:
hmmm, £400x 4 + £209 + £200 =
Why?
Folding, that's 4 of these GTX295's i supposeFFLink13 wrote:
£400 x 4?twoblacklines wrote:
hmmm, £400x 4 + £209 + £200 =
Why?
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
now that would get tricky considering the needed wattage of the PSU. Not to talk about the number of needed power cables....DeathUnlimited wrote:
Folding, that's 4 of these GTX295's i supposeFFLink13 wrote:
£400 x 4?twoblacklines wrote:
hmmm, £400x 4 + £209 + £200 =
Why?
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
Hmm...it looks powerful here and there. In some of the tests I noticed that it just barely outran the 4870X2. I think it's too little, too late.
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
This is very short-lived product. Only reason for its existence is HD 4870 X2. All they want from this card is to get bigger E-penis for couple weeks more till they release GT300 that will replace this odd sandwich.haffeysucks wrote:
Hmm...it looks powerful here and there. In some of the tests I noticed that it just barely outran the 4870X2. I think it's too little, too late.
Last edited by GC_PaNzerFIN (2008-12-18 14:19:19)
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
And the heat...GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
now that would get tricky considering the needed wattage of the PSU. Not to talk about the number of needed power cables....DeathUnlimited wrote:
Folding, that's 4 of these GTX295's i supposeFFLink13 wrote:
£400 x 4?
Why?
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg