Fire Fox lags on some sites and not on others ( any ideas why? )

2008-12-21 17:42:58

#1

Breez: AKA: badhq; +937|6897|Derby, England

I have small issue with FF when i visit some sites it lags me really bad and yeat its ok on others.... This sites are just php sites like phpnuke.com or phpbb.com any ideas why it's happening ?

I have tried reinstalling FF cleaning my catch and getting read of my cookies :s as well as Defrag still same thing...

2008-12-21 17:46:51

#2

phishman420: Banned; +821|5946

Does it do it on other browsers?

2008-12-21 17:48:32

#3

Cheez: Herman is a warmaphrodite; +1,027|6704|King Of The Islands

What Addons do you run?

My state was founded by Batman. Your opinion is invalid.

2008-12-21 17:58:02

#4

FloppY_: +1,010|6551|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

Cheez wrote:
What Addons do you run?

Yeah we need a list of addons before we can help you...

Also: are you using firefox 2 or 3 ??

Firefox 2 had some problems with flash based content running slower or lagging...

Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me

2008-12-21 18:41:58

#5

Breez: AKA: badhq; +937|6897|Derby, England

FF3 I use linkification the linkchecker and an add blocker skype and Web Developer

2008-12-21 23:09:30

#6

Scorpion0x17: can detect anyone's visible post count...; +691|7031|Cambridge (UK)

Post a list of links that lag for you and a list of links that don't lag for you.

2008-12-22 00:31:27

#7

tazz.: oz.; +1,338|6440|Sydney | ♥

Re-install FF?

^{everything i write is a ramble and should not be taken seriously.... _{seriously. ♥}}

2008-12-22 00:39:13

#8

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6463|Winland

Are there by any chance many small pictures scattered all over on those sites? Firefox sucks at displaying sites like Trackr with around 50 small pictures everywhere.

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-12-22 04:42:44

#9

kylef: Gone; +1,352|6759|N. Ireland

Freezer7Pro wrote:
Are there by any chance many small pictures scattered all over on those sites? Firefox sucks at displaying sites like Trackr with around 50 small pictures everywhere.

Pics?

2008-12-22 04:52:57

#10

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6463|Winland

kylef wrote:
Freezer7Pro wrote:
Are there by any chance many small pictures scattered all over on those sites? Firefox sucks at displaying sites like Trackr with around 50 small pictures everywhere.
Pics?

Eh?

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-12-22 05:44:12

#11

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6418|what

Freezer7Pro wrote:
kylef wrote:
Freezer7Pro wrote:
Are there by any chance many small pictures scattered all over on those sites? Firefox sucks at displaying sites like Trackr with around 50 small pictures everywhere.
Pics?
Eh?

It means he(we) don't beleive you.

"Pics?" is short for the popular "Pics or it didn't happen" catch phrase often associated with ones disbelief to that of a previous postee's remarks which are in-fact often rather erroneous in said anecdotal references with flagrant and fanciful narrative drawing upon one's delusions often extraneous to definite actuality.

2008-12-22 07:08:02

#12

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6463|Winland

TheAussieReaper wrote:
Freezer7Pro wrote:
kylef wrote:

Pics?
Eh?
It means he(we) don't beleive you.

"Pics?" is short for the popular "Pics or it didn't happen" catch phrase often associated with ones disbelief to that of a previous postee's remarks which are in-fact often rather erroneous in said anecdotal references with flagrant and fanciful narrative drawing upon one's delusions often extraneous to definite actuality.

It's pretty hard to get a pic of a browser lagging.

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-12-22 07:12:49

#13

kylef: Gone; +1,352|6759|N. Ireland

Freezer7Pro wrote:
It's pretty hard to get a pic of a browser lagging.

You made it seem as if there was a permanent issue, hence my confusion.

Freezer7Pro wrote:
Firefox sucks at displaying sites like Trackr with around 50 small pictures everywhere.

2008-12-22 09:47:43

#14

Breez: AKA: badhq; +937|6897|Derby, England

Site that lags for me www.phpbb.com

Site that dosent lag for me www.bf2s.com

BF2S Forums Fire Fox lags on some sites and not on others ( any ideas why? )

Cheez wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

kylef wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

kylef wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

TheAussieReaper wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

kylef wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Board footer