They really need to move the inauguration over to the spring, when it'sPoseidon wrote:
So, the Mall looked nice today.
1) Warmer
2) Prettier, with the cherry blossoms in bloom and all that
It'd look more awsm tbh.
Poll
Go to class or watch the Inauguration?
| Go to class | 47% | 47% - 40 | ||||
| Watch the Inauguration | 52% | 52% - 45 | ||||
| Total: 85 | ||||||
1) Warmer
2) Prettier, with the cherry blossoms in bloom and all that
It'd look more awsm tbh.
They used to have it around April (a long time ago) IIRC. Dunno why they changed it.Hurricane2k9 wrote:
They really need to move the inauguration over to the spring, when it'sPoseidon wrote:
So, the Mall looked nice today.
1) Warmer
2) Prettier, with the cherry blossoms in bloom and all that
It'd look more awsm tbh.
There's also reports someone (Senator Robert Byrd or Ted Kennedy I think) collapsed and they had to call paramedics.
Null, slept and then watched the luncheon does that count as watching it ? I did see Bush leave though.
we could only be so lucky...Poseidon wrote:
Ted Kennedy I think
Hey Varegg, stop trying so hard buddy. You don't like me, I don't like you. That post is supposed to be obscurely funny, not rabidly offensive. You're just looking desperate now to try and find some evidential backup for your pathetic "Hmph we're arguing, I'm gonna banz you!" resort that just received actual 'Wait, you can't do that!' responses from other ordinary members. And hey, don't tell me to "shape up and get out", are you one of a countless-who-gives-a-fuck Moderation team or are you the exclusive king of BF2s? I don't have to shape up for you at all, be mature and give the same advice to yourself that you administer to every one else- ignore me, be a better person, rise and overcome.Varegg wrote:
Here is another fresh example ... http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?pi … 0#p2474660I suggest you shape up or get out ...Uzique wrote:
Oh yes.Mekstizzle wrote:
All these stupid yuppie apple mac places like starbucks and costa etc.. fuck them all, and their overpriced shit
And fuck the faux-witty people that sit in them and mention this activity in every other post they make on Internet forums as if it impresses 1% of the non-lobotomized/vegetative human population.
Hurricane if you're an actual discerning coffee-drinker you will know that drinking Starbucks is equivalent to drinking the muddy water your mother shits out after a hard sweaty night of anal. Claiming to simply like Starbucks because you like coffee is like claiming you like molesting 3 year old children because you like sexual arousal. It's perverse and wrong.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Actually you don't ... you and me have the same set of rules to follow on this forum ...Uzique wrote:
I'm a member, not a Moderator. I have a wider playing field with what to be 'funny', a wider license and can afford to be intentionally risky. If you reply in the same way it just makes you look unprofessional, especially when your method of resolving a personal bitch-fest is to fallback on your trusty Moderator ban-buttons. Makes you look like a fucking idiot.Varegg wrote:
How so ... he claims his posting style is funny not condecending, i answer him in the same way he usually answeres people and he should feel offended, get a grip ffs ...mikkel wrote:
Because you'd look just as much like you've got your panties in a twist as Uzique does. If you're going to get personal with someone, don't use your moderator privileges to settle things. That's ridiculous.
The clue here is when i answered you in the same style as you constantly use you all of a sudden felt offended meaning you don't much like to be adressed as you post ... that was a brief experiment and test you completely failed ...
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
Topic fellas.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Riiight, I'm sure it was Varegg You dropped the ball and acted out of your standard-setting role and now it's all a random and cleverly-designed 'test' of my ability. Hahaha, as if I would even care to 'perform' appropriately in any test or standard-measure designed by you anyway. Now who's being so "fucking brilliant"?
The best thing is you cannot even ban me or AWM me for being so perversely off-topic! Such is the extreme of your silly vendetta and mission to find an excuse to ban me that you're inadvertedly breaking your own rules repeatedly time and time again. Oopsie. Definitely doesn't make me want to 'shape up' or reform any of my behaviourisms for a Moderator such as yourself... what a terrible example!
The best thing is you cannot even ban me or AWM me for being so perversely off-topic! Such is the extreme of your silly vendetta and mission to find an excuse to ban me that you're inadvertedly breaking your own rules repeatedly time and time again. Oopsie. Definitely doesn't make me want to 'shape up' or reform any of my behaviourisms for a Moderator such as yourself... what a terrible example!
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
shut it and get back on topic.
Just for the sake of it i thought i give some ample chance to redeem yourself in the posts that followed but you are still keeping up with the same condecending tone thinking you are so much better than the rest ... that and the fact that you resort to name calling just proves my point ...Uzique wrote:
Riiight, I'm sure it was Varegg You dropped the ball and acted out of your standard-setting role and now it's all a random and cleverly-designed 'test' of my ability. Hahaha, as if I would even care to 'perform' appropriately in any test or standard-measure designed by you anyway. Now who's being so "fucking brilliant"?
The best thing is you cannot even ban me or AWM me for being so perversely off-topic! Such is the extreme of your silly vendetta and mission to find an excuse to ban me that you're inadvertedly breaking your own rules repeatedly time and time again. Oopsie. Definitely doesn't make me want to 'shape up' or reform any of my behaviourisms for a Moderator such as yourself... what a terrible example!
Good luck getting a new account ...
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
Well, that was fun...
Back on topic -
How about that black dude?
Back on topic -
How about that black dude?
WHAT THE FUCK I THOUGHT THIS OBAMA DUDE WAS WHITEPoseidon wrote:
Well, that was fun...
Back on topic -
How about that black dude?
He must have been bloody freezing when he was doing his speech, -1 degrees c reportedly and thats not counting windchill. Yet he unlike seemingly everyone else did not where gloves, considering he was dressed in a suit the bloke must have been frozen by the end of it.Poseidon wrote:
Well, that was fun...
Back on topic -
How about that black dude?
Oh and why did everyone else seem to have the same pair of leather gloves? I call shenanigans!
I think karma's coming into play - both Kennedy AND Byrd collaped. The two senators with the shadiest backrounds.
Well, you know what color they say to wear when it gets cold...Noobeater wrote:
He must have been bloody freezing when he was doing his speech, -1 degrees c reportedly and thats not counting windchill. Yet he unlike seemingly everyone else did not where gloves, considering he was dressed in a suit the bloke must have been frozen by the end of it.Poseidon wrote:
Well, that was fun...
Back on topic -
How about that black dude?
Oh and why did everyone else seem to have the same pair of leather gloves? I call shenanigans!
Last edited by Poseidon (2009-01-20 12:02:30)
yeah it's fucking cold hereNoobeater wrote:
He must have been bloody freezing when he was doing his speech, -1 degrees c reportedly and thats not counting windchill. Yet he unlike seemingly everyone else did not where gloves, considering he was dressed in a suit the bloke must have been frozen by the end of it.Poseidon wrote:
Well, that was fun...
Back on topic -
How about that black dude?
Oh and why did everyone else seem to have the same pair of leather gloves? I call shenanigans!
Lmfao what bad luck for Kennedy and Byrd
http://www.whitehouse.gov/administratio … ent_obama/
lez do it
Also, why are British troops from 1776 marching?
lez do it
Also, why are British troops from 1776 marching?
Last edited by Poseidon (2009-01-20 12:23:34)
They actually showed it in my classes today.
AND I'M IN CANADA.
AND I'M IN CANADA.
to symbolize how we kicked their assesPoseidon wrote:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/president_obama/
lez do it
Also, why are British troops from 1776 marching?
Right-oHurricane2k9 wrote:
to symbolize how we kicked their assesPoseidon wrote:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/president_obama/
lez do it
Also, why are British troops from 1776 marching?
God damn, that Presidential Limo is so fucking sexy.
His official white house portrait needs to be about 32% more gangsta, imfo
Shut up you nob.Mekstizzle wrote:
His official white house portrait needs to be about 32% more gangsta, imfo
That's no limo, that's my wife!Poseidon wrote:
Right-oHurricane2k9 wrote:
to symbolize how we kicked their assesPoseidon wrote:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/president_obama/
lez do it
Also, why are British troops from 1776 marching?
God damn, that Presidential Limo is so fucking sexy.
double nob.The Sheriff wrote:
Shut up you nob.Mekstizzle wrote:
His official white house portrait needs to be about 32% more gangsta, imfo
Hurricane2k9 wrote:
That's no limo, that's my wife!Poseidon wrote:
Right-oHurricane2k9 wrote:
to symbolize how we kicked their asses
God damn, that Presidential Limo is so fucking sexy.
