CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6971
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,484864,00.html

Good news amidst all the economic carnage! I find the concept of hired armies quite frankly repugnant. Monetarily driven military outfits are an important part of what makes up the scum of the earth.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2009-01-29 04:04:07)

lowing
Banned
+1,662|7067|USA

CameronPoe wrote:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,484864,00.html

Good news amidst all the economic carnage! I find the concept of hired armies quite frankly repugnant. Monetarily driven military outfits are an important part of what makes up the scum of the earth.
I guess the IRA got all of their resources for free huh?
Burwhale
Save the BlobFish!
+136|6638|Brisneyland
Looks like they may just get a different mercenary replacement.

foxnews wrote:

"We sent our decision to the U.S. Embassy last Friday," Khalaf told The Associated Press in a phone interview. "They have to find a new security company."
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7177

lowing wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,484864,00.html

Good news amidst all the economic carnage! I find the concept of hired armies quite frankly repugnant. Monetarily driven military outfits are an important part of what makes up the scum of the earth.
I guess the IRA got all of their resources for free huh?
yup.

and arent all modern militaries "hired" and "paid" to fight?
Beduin
Compensation of Reactive Power in the grid
+510|6166|شمال
Send them to Afghanistan
الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,822|6521|eXtreme to the maX
Good, using grenade launchers on civilians, glad they're being told to GTFO.

Last edited by Dilbert_X (2009-01-29 04:23:03)

Fuck Israel
JahManRed
wank
+646|7043|IRELAND

lowing wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,484864,00.html

Good news amidst all the economic carnage! I find the concept of hired armies quite frankly repugnant. Monetarily driven military outfits are an important part of what makes up the scum of the earth.
I guess the IRA got all of their resources for free huh?
The volunteers of the IRA never got paid a penny. Their motivation was not money or to go all John Wayne on some Iraqi ass, it was to unite Ireland. Plus they were up against one of the best trained and supplied armies in the world using 20 year old weapons most of the time. No comparison whatsoever.
Yeah their resources where free, thanks partly to your fellow country men. Cheers for that.
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6568|what

I don't consider the IRA mercenaries.

Glad Blackwater has been removed.
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7067|USA

JahManRed wrote:

lowing wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,484864,00.html

Good news amidst all the economic carnage! I find the concept of hired armies quite frankly repugnant. Monetarily driven military outfits are an important part of what makes up the scum of the earth.
I guess the IRA got all of their resources for free huh?
The volunteers of the IRA never got paid a penny. Their motivation was not money or to go all John Wayne on some Iraqi ass, it was to unite Ireland. Plus they were up against one of the best trained and supplied armies in the world using 20 year old weapons most of the time. No comparison whatsoever.
Yeah their resources where free, thanks partly to your fellow country men. Cheers for that.
You mean the IRA never had to buy weapons or information, nothing?
Surgeons
U shud proabbly f off u fat prik
+3,097|6905|Gogledd Cymru

He said monetarily driven, as in Mercenaries, no one hired the IRA to do shit.
Varegg
Support fanatic :-)
+2,206|7225|Nårvei

lowing wrote:

JahManRed wrote:

lowing wrote:


I guess the IRA got all of their resources for free huh?
The volunteers of the IRA never got paid a penny. Their motivation was not money or to go all John Wayne on some Iraqi ass, it was to unite Ireland. Plus they were up against one of the best trained and supplied armies in the world using 20 year old weapons most of the time. No comparison whatsoever.
Yeah their resources where free, thanks partly to your fellow country men. Cheers for that.
You mean the IRA never had to buy weapons or information, nothing?
Have your reading skills gone bad lowing?

He said they didn't fight for money and if you didn't catch the other clue in there he also said IRA got much of their funds from US citizens ...
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
Braddock
Agitator
+916|6706|Éire

lowing wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,484864,00.html

Good news amidst all the economic carnage! I find the concept of hired armies quite frankly repugnant. Monetarily driven military outfits are an important part of what makes up the scum of the earth.
I guess the IRA got all of their resources for free huh?
If you believe Irish Republicanism was a financially motivated philosophy you need to read some history books my friend.

EDIT: I think lowing might be getting the IRA mixed up with the A-Team?

Last edited by Braddock (2009-01-29 05:20:09)

Stubbee
Religions Hate Facts, Questions and Doubts
+223|7159|Reality

usmarine wrote:

lowing wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,484864,00.html

Good news amidst all the economic carnage! I find the concept of hired armies quite frankly repugnant. Monetarily driven military outfits are an important part of what makes up the scum of the earth.
I guess the IRA got all of their resources for free huh?
yup.

and arent all modern militaries "hired" and "paid" to fight?
A standing army and a mercenary outfit are apples and cow patties dude. You should know better having served (serving?). Do you just always say the opposite of people like Cam or do you actually think once and a while?
The US economy is a giant Ponzi scheme. And 'to big to fail' is code speak for 'niahnahniahniahnah 99 percenters'
Braddock
Agitator
+916|6706|Éire

usmarine wrote:

lowing wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,484864,00.html

Good news amidst all the economic carnage! I find the concept of hired armies quite frankly repugnant. Monetarily driven military outfits are an important part of what makes up the scum of the earth.
I guess the IRA got all of their resources for free huh?
yup.

and arent all modern militaries "hired" and "paid" to fight?
Don't ever tell me you're a patriot or that anyone owes you any gratitude for what you've for your country because it sounds to me like you were just in it for the pay cheque dude.
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6945|Global Command
I find the use of mercenaries pretty revolting.
san4
The Mas
+311|7104|NYC, a place to live
Blackwater is just going to be replaced by Brownwater or whatever the next security company is. The problem isn't the company, it's the situation they're in.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6971

lowing wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,484864,00.html

Good news amidst all the economic carnage! I find the concept of hired armies quite frankly repugnant. Monetarily driven military outfits are an important part of what makes up the scum of the earth.
I guess the IRA got all of their resources for free huh?
They fought for a cause - not for riches and splendour. They weren't fighting to put food on the table or for a fancy car. They were fighting for freedom. Mercenaries fight to get paid, otherwise they'd join the regular military. Blackwater could get hired by Zimbabwe or Burma - they have little/no morals and don't fight on principle or for certain values. A money machine whose wheels are oiled by death, conflict and the misery of others. And it seems Iraq has had enough now that they have their sovereignty again.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2009-01-29 07:29:25)

Doctor Strangelove
Real Battlefield Veterinarian.
+1,758|6884

The Sheriff wrote:

He said monetarily driven, as in Mercenaries, no one hired the IRA to do shit.
You don't know that
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7067|USA

Stubbee wrote:

usmarine wrote:

lowing wrote:


I guess the IRA got all of their resources for free huh?
yup.

and arent all modern militaries "hired" and "paid" to fight?
A standing army and a mercenary outfit are apples and cow patties dude. You should know better having served (serving?). Do you just always say the opposite of people like Cam or do you actually think once and a while?
Well to be honest, in this case, I was just tryin' to rattle a few cages.

I however have no problem with mercenaries, their motivation is real, money. Makes more sense than fighting a war in the name of God.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7067|USA

CameronPoe wrote:

lowing wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,484864,00.html

Good news amidst all the economic carnage! I find the concept of hired armies quite frankly repugnant. Monetarily driven military outfits are an important part of what makes up the scum of the earth.
I guess the IRA got all of their resources for free huh?
They fought for a cause - not for riches and splendour. They weren't fighting to put food on the table or for a fancy car. They were fighting for freedom. Mercenaries fight to get paid, otherwise they'd join the regular military. Blackwater could get hired by Zimbabwe or Burma - they have little/no morals and don't fight on principle or for certain values. A money machine whose wheels are oiled by death, conflict and the misery of others. And it seems Iraq has had enough now that they have their sovereignty again.
I don't think blackwater can or would fight for a cause that was against US interests. I might be wrong.
oug
Calmer than you are.
+380|6935|Πάϊ

lowing wrote:

I however have no problem with mercenaries, their motivation is real, money.
You would kill for money then... How fascinating.
ƒ³
IG-Calibre
comhalta
+226|7158|Tír Eoghan, Tuaisceart Éireann

lowing wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,484864,00.html

Good news amidst all the economic carnage! I find the concept of hired armies quite frankly repugnant. Monetarily driven military outfits are an important part of what makes up the scum of the earth.
I guess the IRA got all of their resources for free huh?
LOLing .. seeking some kind of equivalency with a Terrorist organisation....
san4
The Mas
+311|7104|NYC, a place to live
I'm pretty sure Blackwater's role in Iraq is security, not offensive warfare. They're not supposed to shoot unless attacked.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7067|USA

oug wrote:

lowing wrote:

I however have no problem with mercenaries, their motivation is real, money.
You would kill for money then... How fascinating.
Nope I wouldn't, I just don't see any more disgusting than any other stupid reason for war like religion. How come you are not up in arms about killing for religion? Or is this where I am supposed to say, you would kill for religion then...how fascinating.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7067|USA

IG-Calibre wrote:

lowing wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,484864,00.html

Good news amidst all the economic carnage! I find the concept of hired armies quite frankly repugnant. Monetarily driven military outfits are an important part of what makes up the scum of the earth.
I guess the IRA got all of their resources for free huh?
LOLing .. seeking some kind of equivalency with a Terrorist organisation....
Uhhh yeah the IRA was a terrorist organisation, sorry.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard