It's called fair usage and Ken is 100% correct here.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
You can sample tracks at Amazon, Itunes, Lala, off a groups website, etc. All those are legitimate. What I'm saying is youtube wasn't created so 14 year-olds could watch music videos and Family Guy clips.andy12 wrote:
So what you are saying is instead of sampling tracks on youtube we should download them for free? Well I don't know, having Lady gaga as a file is harder to delete than removing the cookies for the youtube search...KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
The people that founded youtube started it as a business. It was a natural progression that the inclusion of copyrighted content would be addressed in regards to youtube's business plan. If you failed to understand that natural progression and instead thought youtube was created so that you could look up music videos and watch Simpsons TV clips I don't feel sorry for you.
Internet (and youtube) changed media. It will take more than 1 year for record companies to adjust to the medium and create new revenue streams, so suck it up. People bitching because youtube deletes copyright, record companies bitch because people use unlicensed material. Both need to QQ.
Xbone Stormsurgezz