haffeysucks wrote:
andy12 wrote:
Anything more specific than "speed", "pure speed" and "compatibility"? Really, just think about it. It's like 5 different brands of Cookie, they're all delicious with minor differences. Bad example since cookies don't have a condescending "mines better then urs lol" eaterbase
so you would eat a cookie made out of sawdust just because it's considered a "cookie?" i'll take the cookie that i can personalize to my liking. personally i don't care about speed and most webpages are compatible with firefox, so
personally that's what i use. i don't think i ever said once what
you or anyone else should use.
kev - get em =]
andy -but yea there are alot of differences
time the loading time on those browsers and tell me they're the same
tell me that you can add all the same add-ons that you can on one that you can add to the others
for some people that use internet explorer cuz they like microsoft and think they make good stuff let them
they arent bothering you from being any less retarded and single minded than you already are
dont come running your mouth comparing web browsers to cookies, you look like a fool
no one cares how long you've been here, doesnt make your argument right or even valid for that matter
have a nice day
oh and firefox ftw