I'm 16, I just find it amazing that someone would actually go out with someone who "likes to argue".Uzique wrote:
Nope, good try though.
Are you even at the legal age of consent? Bit of a strange jibe to direct at someone considering you have repeatedly said on this Forum that you don't get poontang from your playground-girlfriend.
I'm not going to lie, I was really high that day and in a rush. Not that I had anything to do, I'm just not a chill high. Either way, no love lost.Uzique wrote:
Don't downplay it, the 'spelling error argument' only came out because you repeatedly typed like a dyslexic quadriplegic whilst at the same time stating that you were an English Literature student at one of the best Arts departments in Canada. A little incongruous - that is all - had nothing to do with my self-serving lulz activities in the Forum. I'm never 'secretive' about any 'motives', it would be overstating things to even say that it was that thought out and calculating. I just enjoy toasting, flamegrilling, spitroasting, sticking a fork in...
And yes, many people cannot take the butthurt. I've been banned for calling someone a "nob" before, I mean come on, that's the English equivalent of the word 'douche'; it inflicts about as much insult as a wet-fart to the face.
They're not speech-marks, they're paraphrases.Pochsy wrote:
I'm not going to lie, I was really high that day and in a rush. Not that I had anything to do, I'm just not a chill high. Either way, no love lost.Uzique wrote:
Don't downplay it, the 'spelling error argument' only came out because you repeatedly typed like a dyslexic quadriplegic whilst at the same time stating that you were an English Literature student at one of the best Arts departments in Canada. A little incongruous - that is all - had nothing to do with my self-serving lulz activities in the Forum. I'm never 'secretive' about any 'motives', it would be overstating things to even say that it was that thought out and calculating. I just enjoy toasting, flamegrilling, spitroasting, sticking a fork in...
And yes, many people cannot take the butthurt. I've been banned for calling someone a "nob" before, I mean come on, that's the English equivalent of the word 'douche'; it inflicts about as much insult as a wet-fart to the face.
And while thinking about proper english, why do you place words and phrases I have not used in quotes? Examples being "spelling error argument" and "secretive". joking.
sort of. nice first thing in the morning. and they're roll ups, so they actually taste of something. still wish i didn't smoke though.phishman420 wrote:
cigarettes are so fucking nasty dude
It may work. give it a bit of time. And you can call me tedUzique wrote:
FatherTed I'm pretty sure the blog idea doesn't work, blogs are the unwanted abortions of the Web 2.0 revolution.
Well that explain that. I thought you were using single quotation marks, which I know you Brits are famous for.Uzique wrote:
They're not speech-marks, they're paraphrases.
' ' =/= " ".
.
Ben, you're 3 years older than me . I probably could quit, but to some degree i still enjoy smoking. best time to quit was probably over xmasphishman420 wrote:
if i can quit, anyone can. i started when you were still in diapers and quit last summer without a problem
I'm a sworn enemy!Uzique wrote:
I prefer to address my sworn enemies by their full identity in all of its repugnant aversity, Laird Ted of Dalcastle III.
Last edited by FatherTed (2009-03-08 08:56:17)
fuuuuuuuucccckphishman420 wrote:
4 yrs brah. i started when i was 7/8
Poor source to be honest, we do things the complete opposite to the way the site claims here, in academic writing and formal essays.Pochsy wrote:
Well that explain that. I thought you were using single quotation marks, which I know you Brits are famous for.Uzique wrote:
They're not speech-marks, they're paraphrases.
' ' =/= " ".
.
Quick site I found to explain why I messed up.
http://www.writersblock.ca/tips/monthtip/tipapr99.htm
Last line on the page says it.
1) It's been fairly clean on the spam front, and i've answered questions as quickly as i canATG wrote:
Q:
Hey fartherder; give me two good reasons why this mess shouldn't be declared doa as having run its course and tossed into the infernal pit of damned threads?
Can't argue with #3.FatherTed wrote:
1) It's been fairly clean on the spam front, and i've answered questions as quickly as i canATG wrote:
Q:
Hey fartherder; give me two good reasons why this mess shouldn't be declared doa as having run its course and tossed into the infernal pit of damned threads?
2) It's managed 5 pages fairly quickly, and it's not just the same people posting over and over again
and for a bonus point
3) I'm cute.
Your gay.Uzique wrote:
Noooooooooooo. I still need a laughably 'witty' retort from Finray/Schloppy, and I was going to dramatically develop the fictional feud between me and Ted into an epic tale of gothic horror and the duality of good and evil!
you'reFinray wrote:
Your gay.Uzique wrote:
Noooooooooooo. I still need a laughably 'witty' retort from Finray/Schloppy, and I was going to dramatically develop the fictional feud between me and Ted into an epic tale of gothic horror and the duality of good and evil!
Good enough?
i havent even had breakfast yet. what shall i devour?Fat_Swinub wrote:
Guys what did y'all have for lunch?
Last edited by phishman420 (2009-03-08 09:28:07)
No shit.phishman420 wrote:
you'reFinray wrote:
Your gay.Uzique wrote:
Noooooooooooo. I still need a laughably 'witty' retort from Finray/Schloppy, and I was going to dramatically develop the fictional feud between me and Ted into an epic tale of gothic horror and the duality of good and evil!
Good enough?