.Sup wrote:
I heard its better for hygienic reasonsDrunkFace wrote:
Benefits: None
What rational person would have any surgery for no reason?
Whatever the woman wants
_______________________________________________________________________________________________ 
Mutantsteak wrote:
Whatever the woman wants
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
You'd cut parts of your dick off for the demands of a serpentine woman?Mutantsteak wrote:
Whatever the woman wants
So what happens when you break-up and find another? Pretty sure they don't give receipts at the hospital for circumcision operations...
It's only better "for hygiene" if a guy with foreskin doesn't know how to roll it back and give the goddamn pecker a good clean in the shower. That's like saying it's better to shave off all your bodyhair because it's better for hygiene reasons; yeah... that or you could just LEARN TO USE SHAMPOO.
Last edited by Uzique (2009-04-01 13:30:40)
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Yes and no. Without it, hygiene may be easier. But it also protects from crap. So it's a 50/50 on that one.Kimmmmmmmmmmmm wrote:
.Sup wrote:
I heard its better for hygienic reasonsDrunkFace wrote:
Benefits: None
What rational person would have any surgery for no reason?
The whole thing really means nothing to me, I couldnt care less if my dick had some extra skin on it or notUzique wrote:
You'd cut parts of your dick off for the demands of a serpentine woman?Mutantsteak wrote:
Whatever the woman wants
So what happens when you break-up and find another? Pretty sure they don't give receipts at the hospital for circumcision operations...
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
No wai. It's woman out the door if she'll be trying anything that sketchy with my private things.Mutantsteak wrote:
Whatever the woman wants
I'd only do that for my wife not just for any girlMutantsteak wrote:
Whatever the woman wants
No wai. It's wife pack your shit if she'll be trying anything that sketchy with my private things..Sup wrote:
I'd only do that for my wife not just for any girlMutantsteak wrote:
Whatever the woman wants
Its not like shes gonna byte off the skin with her mouth, I'd visit a pro to do itUltrafunkula wrote:
No wai. It's wife pack your shit if she'll be trying anything that sketchy with my private things..Sup wrote:
I'd only do that for my wife not just for any girlMutantsteak wrote:
Whatever the woman wants
Holy fuck. This.[-DER-]Omega wrote:
I just had mine "done" a few months ago. The worst thing would be the random erections waking me up in the middle of the night, feeling as if the stitches were about to tear out of the skin.
I had mine done on the 31st Jan last year. I'm glad I had it done tbh. The second to worst part was....being off school for 2 weeks...bored...with just the internet. Work it out
If you get more pleasure while having sex with foreskin than without it. It is the only reason to keep it tbhKimmmmmmmmmmmm wrote:
woah im learning about foreskin today!http://www.circumcision.org/foreskin.htmThe foreskin represents at least a third of the penile skin. It protects the glans from abrasion and contact with clothes. (4) The foreskin also increases sexual pleasure by sliding up and down on the shaft, stimulating the glans by alternately covering and exposing it. This can occur during masturbation or intercourse. Friction is minimized, and supplementary lubrication is not needed. (5) Without the foreskin, the glans skin, which is normally moist mucous membrane, becomes dry and thickens considerably in response to continued exposure. This change reduces its sensitivity. (6) In addition, the loss of a secretion called smegma of the inner foreskin layer removes natural lubrication. Oral-genital sexual activity is more common in the United States than in many other societies. (7) Could the lack of natural lubrication of the penis due to circumcision be a reason?
I thought this is done when you're really youngJakAttaK wrote:
Holy fuck. This.[-DER-]Omega wrote:
I just had mine "done" a few months ago. The worst thing would be the random erections waking me up in the middle of the night, feeling as if the stitches were about to tear out of the skin.
I had mine done on the 31st Jan last year. I'm glad I had it done tbh. The second to worst part was....being off school for 2 weeks...bored...with just the internet. Work it out
Na, I had to have mine done. It's a really embarressing story, and I had to explain it to my mates afterwards. Luckily they didn't take the piss out of me.Sup wrote:
I thought this is done when you're really youngJakAttaK wrote:
Holy fuck. This.[-DER-]Omega wrote:
I just had mine "done" a few months ago. The worst thing would be the random erections waking me up in the middle of the night, feeling as if the stitches were about to tear out of the skin.
I had mine done on the 31st Jan last year. I'm glad I had it done tbh. The second to worst part was....being off school for 2 weeks...bored...with just the internet. Work it out
I had it done when I was a baby, so I don't remember it at all. Go ahead if you want to do it for your child unless you somehow know they have super-memories. I certainly can't fathom doing it when you will recall the procedure, though.
not yet, but I'm pretty sure they are gonna pull your pants down when females will be around j/kJakAttaK wrote:
Na, I had to have mine done. It's a really embarressing story, and I had to explain it to my mates afterwards. Luckily they didn't take the piss out of me.Sup wrote:
I thought this is done when you're really youngJakAttaK wrote:
Holy fuck. This.
I had mine done on the 31st Jan last year. I'm glad I had it done tbh. The second to worst part was....being off school for 2 weeks...bored...with just the internet. Work it out
Haha, I barely see them anymore, college ftl. In all honesty though...If anything it made me more confident..Sup wrote:
not yet, but I'm pretty sure they are gonna pull your pants down when females will be around j/kJakAttaK wrote:
Na, I had to have mine done. It's a really embarressing story, and I had to explain it to my mates afterwards. Luckily they didn't take the piss out of me.Sup wrote:
I thought this is done when you're really young
Fuck that! Nobody is bringing a knife near my cock!
I did mine myself.
I think GravyDan should be at your doorstep shortlySydney wrote:
Fuck that! Nobody is bringing a knife near my cock!
Last edited by .Sup (2009-04-01 14:07:34)
I was circumcised by accident when I went to do my first confession
http://www.nytimes.com/1985/10/08/scien … sec=health
Erm....NYTimes wrote:
According to lawsuits filed in behalf of the two children, the infants suffered severe electrical burns to the penis and adjacent areas when physicians, in separate incidents on the same day, used an electric cauterizing needle as part of the circumcision procedure.
The burns to one of the infants were so severe that his penis was destroyed. A sex change operation has been performed so that the child will be raised as a female, according to a lawsuit filed on behalf of the child's parents, who are identified only as Mr. and Mrs. John Doe.
Published: October 8, 1985argo4 wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/1985/10/08/scien … sec=healthErm....NYTimes wrote:
According to lawsuits filed in behalf of the two children, the infants suffered severe electrical burns to the penis and adjacent areas when physicians, in separate incidents on the same day, used an electric cauterizing needle as part of the circumcision procedure.
The burns to one of the infants were so severe that his penis was destroyed. A sex change operation has been performed so that the child will be raised as a female, according to a lawsuit filed on behalf of the child's parents, who are identified only as Mr. and Mrs. John Doe.
I would hope our medical practices have moved past that stage by now.
I guarantee you circumcision can go wrong no matter what year it is.Vilham wrote:
Published: October 8, 1985argo4 wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/1985/10/08/scien … sec=healthErm....NYTimes wrote:
According to lawsuits filed in behalf of the two children, the infants suffered severe electrical burns to the penis and adjacent areas when physicians, in separate incidents on the same day, used an electric cauterizing needle as part of the circumcision procedure.
The burns to one of the infants were so severe that his penis was destroyed. A sex change operation has been performed so that the child will be raised as a female, according to a lawsuit filed on behalf of the child's parents, who are identified only as Mr. and Mrs. John Doe.
I would hope our medical practices have moved past that stage by now.
Even when using a laser?argo4 wrote:
I guarantee you circumcision can go wrong no matter what year it is.Vilham wrote:
Published: October 8, 1985
I would hope our medical practices have moved past that stage by now.