Point?
Besides of course more clear evidence that Texas is better than your state.
And that institutional racism is not dead, as per the unnecessary ethnicity column.
Besides of course more clear evidence that Texas is better than your state.
And that institutional racism is not dead, as per the unnecessary ethnicity column.
I don't want the state engaging in such activities.
I don't trust them. Today crimes, tomorrow political thoughtcrime.
Just give the murderers over to the family or put them in hard labor for life.
I don't trust them. Today crimes, tomorrow political thoughtcrime.
Just give the murderers over to the family or put them in hard labor for life.
Yes, fuck the Bill of Rights indeed.
We have a Right to be executed?
Some of those men were on death row less than one year.
Some of those men were on death row less than one year.
Is protected by #5ATG wrote:
I don't trust them. Today crimes, tomorrow political thoughtcrime.
Violates #6 and of course #8ATG wrote:
Just give the murderers over to the family or put them in hard labor for life.
Capital punishment has stood up to #8 in the Supreme Court.
We have a right to tell you that you aren't part of the we anymore.
Fair enough.
Take a few minutes and read through some of the final statements.
Some of those men were innocent and your tax dollars were used to put them to death.
Take a few minutes and read through some of the final statements.
Some of those men were innocent and your tax dollars were used to put them to death.
Well not my tax dollars, but there were too many tax dollars spent.ATG wrote:
your tax dollars were used to put them to death.
You live in Texico, right? You buy shit?
You pay taxes.
You pay taxes.
Ah, this is true, but realistically I pay next to nothing relatively speaking.
Who, this man?ATG wrote:
Fair enough.
Take a few minutes and read through some of the final statements.
Some of those men were innocent and your tax dollars were used to put them to death.
http://www.tdcj.state.tx.us/stat/wrightgregorylast.htm
http://www.amnesty.org.au/adp/comments/19267/
Last edited by some_random_panda (2009-04-14 17:33:02)
Government doesn't have the right to kill people.
Nothing does.
Nothing does.
People dont have right to kill people, if they chose to do so, the gouvernement should also make the choice to remove said individual from societies to keep the rest of law abiding citizen safe.DoctaStrangelove wrote:
Government doesn't have the right to kill people.
Nothing does.
Reading some of the case circumstances, I don't really mind these people being executed.
[sarcasim]if they were innocent then how did a jury of their peers find them guilty beyond a resonable doubt?[/sarcasim]ATG wrote:
Fair enough.
Take a few minutes and read through some of the final statements.
Some of those men were innocent and your tax dollars were used to put them to death.
* Forgot to add the sarcasim tags, since most people here don't have the almighty sarcasim detectors on.
Last edited by S3v3N (2009-04-14 18:44:32)
What does it mean (sic)?
I'm not made up on the death penalty I mean if someone is guilty beyond all reasonable doubt what is the point in keeping them alive if the have absolute no chance of rejoining society.
Then again you have someone like Tookie Williams I think he is called. He was the person who started the bloods I think he changed he discouraged young men when making the same mistakes he made. I'm pretty sure he wrote a book too I can't google at the moment I'm on my phone. Yeah well they still executed him even though it seemed like he learned from his mistake.
It's tough to call I mean who really has a right in who lives and dies, then again is it more economical to execute someone whom has no chance of reform?
I'm not made up on the death penalty I mean if someone is guilty beyond all reasonable doubt what is the point in keeping them alive if the have absolute no chance of rejoining society.
Then again you have someone like Tookie Williams I think he is called. He was the person who started the bloods I think he changed he discouraged young men when making the same mistakes he made. I'm pretty sure he wrote a book too I can't google at the moment I'm on my phone. Yeah well they still executed him even though it seemed like he learned from his mistake.
It's tough to call I mean who really has a right in who lives and dies, then again is it more economical to execute someone whom has no chance of reform?
Falsified evidence. The jury was prejudice. 13 white jurors convicted a single black defendant. The police placed the gun on the alleged criminal. etcS3v3N wrote:
if they were innocent then how did a jury of their peers find them guilty beyond a resonable doubt?
No case is 100% proven, ever. Which is why there is the thing called "reasonable doubt"
I personally would rather see lifelong sentences in the worst jail imaginable with no chance for parole rather than the death penalty. Death is too good for these bastards.
Last edited by AussieReaper (2009-04-14 18:34:51)
Well the minorities scream racism in that case.S3v3N wrote:
if they were innocent then how did a jury of their peers find them guilty beyond a resonable doubt?ATG wrote:
Fair enough.
Take a few minutes and read through some of the final statements.
Some of those men were innocent and your tax dollars were used to put them to death.
It was the crips actually.wah1188 wrote:
What does it mean (sic)?
I'm not made up on the death penalty I mean if someone is guilty beyond all reasonable doubt what is the point in keeping them alive if the have absolute no chance of rejoining society.
Then again you have someone like Tookie Williams I think he is called. He was the person who started the bloods I think he changed he discouraged young men when making the same mistakes he made. I'm pretty sure he wrote a book too I can't google at the moment I'm on my phone. Yeah well they still executed him even though it seemed like he learned from his mistake.
It's tough to call I mean who really has a right in who lives and dies, then again is it more economical to execute someone whom has no chance of reform?
It's not so that punishment is cruel or harsh it's so that punishment is definite and inescapable. A person could always turn on what they believe or lie to save they're lives.
forgot to add the sarcasim tags.AussieReaper wrote:
Falsified evidence. The jury was prejudice. 13 white jurors convicted a single black defendant. The police placed the gun on the alleged criminal. etcS3v3N wrote:
if they were innocent then how did a jury of their peers find them guilty beyond a resonable doubt?
No case is 100% proven, ever. Which is why there is the thing called "reasonable doubt"
I personally would rather see lifelong sentences in the worst jail imaginable with no chance for parole rather than the death penalty. Death is too good for these bastards.
my bad.
Thought you were serious too.S3v3N wrote:
forgot to add the sarcasim tags.AussieReaper wrote:
Falsified evidence. The jury was prejudice. 13 white jurors convicted a single black defendant. The police placed the gun on the alleged criminal. etcS3v3N wrote:
if they were innocent then how did a jury of their peers find them guilty beyond a resonable doubt?
No case is 100% proven, ever. Which is why there is the thing called "reasonable doubt"
I personally would rather see lifelong sentences in the worst jail imaginable with no chance for parole rather than the death penalty. Death is too good for these bastards.
my bad.
Then that would make the government killers, meaning someone would need to kill them.Roger Lesboules wrote:
People dont have right to kill people, if they chose to do so, the gouvernement should also make the choice to remove said individual from societies to keep the rest of law abiding citizen safe.DoctaStrangelove wrote:
Government doesn't have the right to kill people.
Nothing does.
I'd like to see someone try to kill society.DoctaStrangelove wrote:
Then that would make the government killers, meaning someone would need to kill them.Roger Lesboules wrote:
People dont have right to kill people, if they chose to do so, the gouvernement should also make the choice to remove said individual from societies to keep the rest of law abiding citizen safe.DoctaStrangelove wrote:
Government doesn't have the right to kill people.
Nothing does.
Flaming_Maniac wrote:
I'd like to see someone try to kill society.DoctaStrangelove wrote:
Then that would make the government killers, meaning someone would need to kill them.Roger Lesboules wrote:
People dont have right to kill people, if they chose to do so, the gouvernement should also make the choice to remove said individual from societies to keep the rest of law abiding citizen safe.
You called?
As long as you have capital punishment you will have innocents getting killed by the government, question is if you think that is okay or not ...
Wait behind the line ..............................................................