Freezer7Pro wrote:
mafia996630 wrote:
Freezer7Pro wrote:
Read the following in a Mickey Mouse voice:
Oh boy! You sure told me there!
Ok Mr Freezer, why do you think a war zone is comparable to a football match ?
What I'm saying is that there is no difference between innocent people in the UK and innocent people in Iraq. I find it disgusting how self-righteous people are about that. When 100 people get killed in a rich country, it's a "disaster", or a "tragedy". When 1000 people get killed in a poor country, it's a "war", and thus somehow justified.
First, your argument with the invasion of Iraq and the Hillsborough disaster isn't an argument.
Second, war isn't justified. You can't compare innocent people dying in war, with innocent people dying in a disaster at a football match.
If you go to a football match, you don't expect the people, who are oragising the match, to fail in doing this probably, leading death.
In war, we have seen innocent people dying, over and over again. War isn't safe, not for the soldiers, not for the innocent civilians. We can do so many things to prevent innocent civilians dying. We're just not willing to. In football, we're not expecting the spectators to die, therefore we should have done anything preventing it from happen.
And you do know, they also play football in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Also, we have the International Criminal Court in Den Haag (The Hague). If you murder a thousand people, saying it's war or the like, this is most likely where you'll end up, facing charges of war crime.