Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6951|San Diego, CA, USA
Everyday Low Politics
Wal-Mart buys protection by selling out its competitors.

Wall Street Journal wrote:

Corporate America's cheerleading for more government involvement in health care now includes Wal-Mart, that liberal paragon of social irresponsibility. The discount giant's ex-critics probably ought to be more skeptical, given that this seems to be anticompetitive special pleading in progressive drag.

This week the nation's largest employer blessed an employer mandate, aka "pay or play." This would require businesses that do not offer "meaningful coverage" -- i.e., government-approved -- to pay some percentage of their payroll to a federal insurance plan. This mandate is one of the more controversial policies in the Democratic health package, and Wal-Mart's endorsement will help it along, or at least give liberals political cover against business criticism.

Another way of putting it is that Andy Stern finally got his man. Wal-Mart CEO Mike Duke was joined in his show of support by Mr. Stern, president of the Service Employees International Union and probably the most influential U.S. labor leader, as well as by John Podesta, President Clinton's former chief of staff now running the leftward Center for American Progress. Both organizations regularly assail Wal-Mart. The SEIU, having failed in its drive to organize Wal-Mart stores, went on to help fund a harassment group called Wal-Mart Watch. The Podesta outfit provides ammunition for critics about the retailer's supposedly skimpy benefits -- especially health coverage -- and other corporate-greed outrages.
Source: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124649408574683287.html


Figures...
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6808|North Carolina
Well yeah...  Walmart operates as if government services actually did take care of healthcare for the public.  They're already designed for business under socialized medicine (mostly because they're too cheap to provide decent benefits themselves).
Deadmonkiefart
Floccinaucinihilipilificator
+177|7109
What do you expect?  It's Walmart.
Red Forman
Banned
+402|5803
i am watching a show about walmart on CNBC.  i am confused a little.  obama supports union for the workers, which we know walmart does not want.  i wonder if this was a little game played by walmart towards obama.  not that i support the union idea.  quite opposite really.  people are not forced to work anywhere.  its a free market. and unions just fuck shit up.
Doctor Strangelove
Real Battlefield Veterinarian.
+1,758|6871

Red Forman wrote:

i am watching a show about walmart on CNBC.  i am confused a little.  obama supports union for the workers, which we know walmart does not want.  i wonder if this was a little game played by walmart towards obama.  not that i support the union idea.  quite opposite really.  people are not forced to work anywhere.  its a free market. and unions just fuck shit up.
Walmart is supporting healthcare, not unionization. Under universal healthcare Walmart will be able to not insure its workforce and at the same time not have to hire new people all the time, as their old employees died off.
Flecco
iPod is broken.
+1,048|7067|NT, like Mick Dundee

Doctor Strangelove wrote:

Red Forman wrote:

i am watching a show about walmart on CNBC.  i am confused a little.  obama supports union for the workers, which we know walmart does not want.  i wonder if this was a little game played by walmart towards obama.  not that i support the union idea.  quite opposite really.  people are not forced to work anywhere.  its a free market. and unions just fuck shit up.
Walmart is supporting healthcare, not unionization. Under universal healthcare Walmart will be able to not insure its workforce and at the same time not have to hire new people all the time, as their old employees died off.
USM was saying maybe Walmart is playing up to Obama to try get him to soften a bit on the union thing.
Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard