lowing
Banned
+1,662|6897|USA

Mekstizzle wrote:

I don't know why they tie Islam into all those scientific advancements and shit. It's not like people tie other religions to advancements. Do we tie Christian advancements to the wtfuckstick amount of shit that Europe invented, or Buddhism/Confucianism to the shit that China invented, or Hinduism to the shit that India invented, etc etc..

The places that Islam conquered, Persia, the Fertile Crescent etc.. were already major sources of Knowledge, Science and Learning.
Thank you
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6897|USA

Spark wrote:

Mekstizzle wrote:

I don't know why they keep equating it all to religion, Islam itself probably had nothing to do, or very little, with it at all. Just like Christianity had more or less nothing to do with the Industrial Revolution or things like that. Just face the facts. And if you really think that some places were just stupid nonsense before Islam came in and showed them the light and brought all these scientific advancements, well there's nothing I can do to change that around really, it's just how you think. I'm not gonna sit here and accept your nonsense about religion being the force behind scientific advancement.

You probably have no idea of pre-Islamic civilisations anyway, in your book the world was nothing before Islam came around. Fuck that shit. Why don't you go ahead and educate yourself of the world before Islam came and took over half of it and then claimed all sorts of technological/scientific advancements from its colonies to itself.
Islam in this context means much more than 'religion'.
Oh I see, so NOW Islam is MORE than just a religion, how convenient. thought I have been making that argument for years.
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6920|Canberra, AUS
in this context
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6897|USA

Spark wrote:

in this context
In other words, when it suits you? Add it to your list of inconsistencies
Beduin
Compensation of Reactive Power in the grid
+510|5996|شمال

Mekstizzle wrote:

I'll tell you what the prime mover for advancements in science/technology was throughout history, it's War.
There can be no government without an army,
no army without money, no money without prosperity,
and no prosperity without justice and good administration.

-Ibn Qutayba, a notable 9th Century Islamic scholar,
in the “Circle of Justice” (daira-yi ‘idalat),
quoted in the Afghan National Development Strategy (ANDS) and NATO's Afghanistan Report 2009
الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6897|USA

lowing wrote:

Beduin wrote:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid … in+Europe#

Many Muslims look back at Muslim Spain with pride. But Jews also call it their "golden era".

Spain became part of the Islamic world at the beginning of the eighth century. Under Muslims, Spain became the center of civilization. Although many local Spaniards embraced Islam, Christians and Jews were free in all aspects of their lives. The Muslims respected their religion and institutions. The result was the birth of the first true cosmopolitan culture in the West.

Christians studied alongside Muslim scholars to such a degree that in 854, a Christian named Alvaro of Cordoba complained that these students were forgetting their own religion and culture.

The Muslims and Christians of Spain did not live in their ghettos, isolated and not cooperating in various aspects of daily life together.

It was in Spain that Aristotle's works on physics and natural history were translated into Arabic from Greek. Historians generally acknowledge that the Muslim world proved to be a major conduit of ancient scholarship into the West, especially through Muslim Spain.

It wasn't just Muslims and Christians who thrived in Spain, though. Jews, who were reviled and hated elsewhere, were not only living safely and peacefully alongside non-Jews in Muslim Spain, they were learning and contributing to its culture and knowledge which Muslim scholars had established. Al-Andalus was a key center of Jewish life during the early Middle Ages, producing important scholars and one of the most stable and wealthy Jewish communities.

But this success in wealth, knowledge and co-existence came to end in a violent and very sad way.

As Christian Crusaders of Spain expelled Muslims, civilization that took centuries to build was destroyed. Muslims and Jews were either expelled or forced to convert to Christianity. Millions died as tolerance was replaced by the Spanish Inquisition. A suspected Muslim was to be killed for the smallest act resembling Islamic tradition - such as taking a bath on Friday.
Science in medieval Islam


-Educate and Cultivate yourself.

Happy new year
from your article,

"This article's factual accuracy is disputed. Please see the relevant discussion on the talk page."

I will leave it up to you to decide if you are going to read the disputes.

Happy New Year to you as well.
I see you chose to ignore it, go figure.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6897|USA

Beduin wrote:

Mekstizzle wrote:

I'll tell you what the prime mover for advancements in science/technology was throughout history, it's War.
There can be no government without an army,
no army without money, no money without prosperity,
and no prosperity without justice and good administration.

-Ibn Qutayba, a notable 9th Century Islamic scholar,
in the “Circle of Justice” (daira-yi ‘idalat),
quoted in the Afghan National Development Strategy (ANDS) and NATO's Afghanistan Report 2009
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPlaS_wGzx8
I really hope you are not going to link science to a religion, a first if you do, and if you chose to, then one can say Islam is scientific proof. If this were the case, then all of your bullshit about inconsistencies with the Koran must be just that, bullshit. Making the Koran scientific truth. Is this what you are claiming? If not, then please explain how you are linking science and religion.

Science is science and has nothing to do with religion.

Last edited by lowing (2009-12-31 10:31:44)

Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6794|San Diego, CA, USA
Maybe we should start a charity, "Prostitutes for Terrorists" and that way lonely, sex deprived terrorists won't kill us???
ruisleipa
Member
+149|6468|teh FIN-land

lowing wrote:

Actually I find it fair

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Pages … uslims.htm

from the same site.

I guess you failed, I asked you to challengethe material, and yet again it is the source you go for. wouldn't challenging the material be far easier and credible if it were wrong and you showed us how it was wrong?

just because you do not like the information does not mean it is wrong or biased. Truth can hurt.
of course you find it fair - you agree with it! Or is that just you doing what you accuse me of doing? Whatever, don't give a shit really...
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6897|USA

ruisleipa wrote:

lowing wrote:

Actually I find it fair

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Pages … uslims.htm

from the same site.

I guess you failed, I asked you to challengethe material, and yet again it is the source you go for. wouldn't challenging the material be far easier and credible if it were wrong and you showed us how it was wrong?

just because you do not like the information does not mean it is wrong or biased. Truth can hurt.
of course you find it fair - you agree with it! Or is that just you doing what you accuse me of doing? Whatever, don't give a shit really...
I find it fair because because of the link I just provided for you.

and you think it is unfair because you disagree with it? What exactly is your point? I provide links to FACTS, how about you do the same instead of trashing a source, show where the information is wrong.But no worries if you don't. you are not the first Islamic apologist that refused to address the information provided.

Last edited by lowing (2010-01-01 05:02:40)

ruisleipa
Member
+149|6468|teh FIN-land

lowing wrote:

you are not the first Islamic apologist that refused to address the information provided.
hahahah. I'm no Islamic apologist. I think there are plenty of Christians and Jews who are as idiotic as many Muslims. but I also know Jews, Christians AND Muslims who are really nice people, even though they're all stupid enough to believe in God. See, unlike you, I don't divide the world into good/bad, Muslim/everyone else, with us/against us, etc.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6897|USA

ruisleipa wrote:

lowing wrote:

you are not the first Islamic apologist that refused to address the information provided.
hahahah. I'm no Islamic apologist. I think there are plenty of Christians and Jews who are as idiotic as many Muslims. but I also know Jews, Christians AND Muslims who are really nice people, even though they're all stupid enough to believe in God. See, unlike you, I don't divide the world into good/bad, Muslim/everyone else, with us/against us, etc.
I know nice people as well, including Muslims, this however has nothing to do with what I think of there religion. You really should learn to know the difference.

Last edited by lowing (2010-01-01 11:37:17)

lowing
Banned
+1,662|6897|USA
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Pages … uslims.htm
were any of you planning on addressing this in conjunction with your tireless argument of bias or should we just ignore it and let it go?

Last edited by lowing (2010-01-01 13:47:24)

Jenspm
penis
+1,716|6978|St. Andrews / Oslo

ruisleipa wrote:

lowing wrote:

you are not the first Islamic apologist that refused to address the information provided.
hahahah. I'm no Islamic apologist. I think there are plenty of Christians and Jews who are as idiotic as many Muslims. but I also know Jews, Christians AND Muslims who are really nice people, even though they're all stupid enough to believe in God. See, unlike you, I don't divide the world into good/bad, Muslim/everyone else, with us/against us, etc.
yet you jump to the conclusion that believing in a God is stupid, you hypocrite.
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/26774/flickricon.png https://twitter.com/phoenix/favicon.ico
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6897|USA

Jenspm wrote:

ruisleipa wrote:

lowing wrote:

you are not the first Islamic apologist that refused to address the information provided.
hahahah. I'm no Islamic apologist. I think there are plenty of Christians and Jews who are as idiotic as many Muslims. but I also know Jews, Christians AND Muslims who are really nice people, even though they're all stupid enough to believe in God. See, unlike you, I don't divide the world into good/bad, Muslim/everyone else, with us/against us, etc.
yet you jump to the conclusion that believing in a God is stupid, you hypocrite.
Good point, wish I had made it.
eleven bravo
Member
+1,399|5505|foggy bottom

lowing wrote:

eleven bravo wrote:

lowing wrote:


Gee, now if only you could possibly find anything I have said to support your post that I am I racist.
Im going to use your overused phrase


If it walks like a duck, talks like a duck and looks like a duck, you got a racist duck
again, if you have any sort of postal evidence that I am a racist, please provide it. If not, you are nothing more than a typical liberal who can not form an argument without using your typical liberal dismissals, denials, and re-directions. You can not back up your argument or your claim with any factual evidence and toe to toe debate.

lowing wrote:

I can't help it if you refuse to examine your own posts.
Tu Stultus Es
cpt.fass1
The Cap'n Can Make it Hap'n
+329|6941|NJ
So with all the money we spend funding all these organizations, they aren't preventing anything?

Also the "take the fight to them" thing really worked out for us huh?
11 Bravo
Banned
+965|5483|Cleveland, Ohio

cpt.fass1 wrote:

So with all the money we spend funding all these organizations, they aren't preventing anything?

Also the "take the fight to them" thing really worked out for us huh?
what?  you make no sense.
Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5424|Sydney

cpt.fass1 wrote:

So with all the money we spend funding all these organizations, they aren't preventing anything?

Also the "take the fight to them" thing really worked out for us huh?
Money and politics.
cpt.fass1
The Cap'n Can Make it Hap'n
+329|6941|NJ
Well the CIA, FBI and Homeland security that was recently set up. We get two attacks recently, New York and this. But we're spending billions on making things like this not happen.

So what are we spending the money on?
eleven bravo
Member
+1,399|5505|foggy bottom
bailing out banks with shady loaning policies.  your future salary

Last edited by eleven bravo (2010-05-04 10:07:00)

Tu Stultus Es
11 Bravo
Banned
+965|5483|Cleveland, Ohio

cpt.fass1 wrote:

Well the CIA, FBI and Homeland security that was recently set up. We get two attacks recently, New York and this. But we're spending billions on making things like this not happen.

So what are we spending the money on?
we are spending money because you are and your industry fucked us......

you think you can stop everything?  wow.
cpt.fass1
The Cap'n Can Make it Hap'n
+329|6941|NJ

11 Bravo wrote:

cpt.fass1 wrote:

Well the CIA, FBI and Homeland security that was recently set up. We get two attacks recently, New York and this. But we're spending billions on making things like this not happen.

So what are we spending the money on?
we are spending money because you are and your industry fucked us......

you think you can stop everything?  wow.
Hmmm how did my industry fuck anything?

The foreclosure rate that is supposely due to adjustable rate mortgages is actually from Property tax increases and a shitty job market.  If anything my industry keep a high number of people employed for some time, labor and office work.

But maybe our economy wouldn't be in such shambles if we didn't have to pay for a million and one overlapping agencies.
Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6794|San Diego, CA, USA
Anyone notice the quantity of terror attacks, both successful and unsuccessful, are higher under Obama than Bush? 

Why?
Little BaBy JESUS
m8
+394|6394|'straya

Harmor wrote:

Anyone notice the quantity of terror attacks, both successful and unsuccessful, are higher under Obama than Bush? 

Why?
I'm not sure. Care to elaborate and possibly answer your own seemingly "rhetorical" question instead of simply insinuating.

On the other hand, if you were actually asking a question then retract my last statement.

Last edited by Little BaBy JESUS (2010-05-04 21:28:18)

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard