Does this count?
H/H 100W Combo Amp.
Marshall 15W Practice Amp.
Nevada wireless sender/reciever.
H/H 100W Combo Amp.
Marshall 15W Practice Amp.
Nevada wireless sender/reciever.
everything there counts except the 100w combo amp as it's dead ATMCammRobb wrote:
Does this count?
H/H 100W Combo Amp.
Marshall 15W Practice Amp.
Nevada wireless sender/reciever.
I Friggin Love The Nhs
Lol, just need to get a voltmeter thing on it and it'll be fine. It's actually been dead for 3 yearsjay_courage wrote:
everything there counts except the 100w combo amp as it's dead ATMCammRobb wrote:
Does this count?
H/H 100W Combo Amp.
Marshall 15W Practice Amp.
Nevada wireless sender/reciever.
Eh, gotta take the chance to show off
My main rig consists of a Luxman L-120A and a pair of JBL 4311Bs. Sourced by a Xonar DX.
The amplifier does 100WPC at 0.0015% THD according to my tests. 106dB SNR. The speakers do 40~15000Hz +/-3dB with usable low extension down to 31.5Hz. <1% THD 40-15k, <0.3% for 100Hz-15k.
My main rig consists of a Luxman L-120A and a pair of JBL 4311Bs. Sourced by a Xonar DX.
The amplifier does 100WPC at 0.0015% THD according to my tests. 106dB SNR. The speakers do 40~15000Hz +/-3dB with usable low extension down to 31.5Hz. <1% THD 40-15k, <0.3% for 100Hz-15k.
Last edited by Freezer7Pro (2010-01-15 02:16:23)
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
You like those Junk But Louds?
EE (hats
Right, the third most sold studio monitor of all time is junkMorpheus wrote:
You like those Junk But Louds?
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
You can't see the troll for the nerd rage? He's been over the forums all day. Beware.Freezer7Pro wrote:
Right, the third most sold studio monitor of all time is junkMorpheus wrote:
You like those Junk But Louds?
That luxman is pretty sweet.
jay_courage wrote:
Just a little thread for audio-heads to compare their set-up, I'll start
you know.. when I get back from my holiday I might make that Official Audio Thread.Freezer7Pro wrote:
Don't we already have a thread like this?
(that'll be in a week or so)
Good lord that's tastyFreezer7Pro wrote:
Eh, gotta take the chance to show off
http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb8/ … o/GEAR.jpg
My main rig consists of a Luxman L-120A and a pair of JBL 4311Bs. Sourced by a Xonar DX.
The amplifier does 100WPC at 0.0015% THD according to my tests. 106dB SNR. The speakers do 40~15000Hz +/-3dB with usable low extension down to 31.5Hz. <1% THD 40-15k, <0.3% for 100Hz-15k.
why can't this be the official audio?
I Friggin Love The Nhs
Actually, I'm sure the studio monitors are good... it's just that for larger scale stuff, there's better out there... although not as cheap.baggs wrote:
You can't see the troll for the nerd rage? He's been over the forums all day. Beware.Freezer7Pro wrote:
Right, the third most sold studio monitor of all time is junkMorpheus wrote:
You like those Junk But Louds?
Don't get me wrong, the price performance is actually pretty decent... it's just that they don't hold up well in the applications I would use them for.
EE (hats
Just for the record, how much do you think I paid for them?Morpheus wrote:
Actually, I'm sure the studio monitors are good... it's just that for larger scale stuff, there's better out there... although not as cheap.baggs wrote:
You can't see the troll for the nerd rage? He's been over the forums all day. Beware.Freezer7Pro wrote:
Right, the third most sold studio monitor of all time is junk
Don't get me wrong, the price performance is actually pretty decent... it's just that they don't hold up well in the applications I would use them for.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
10€ + blowjob?Freezer7Pro wrote:
Just for the record, how much do you think I paid for them?Morpheus wrote:
Actually, I'm sure the studio monitors are good... it's just that for larger scale stuff, there's better out there... although not as cheap.baggs wrote:
You can't see the troll for the nerd rage? He's been over the forums all day. Beware.
Don't get me wrong, the price performance is actually pretty decent... it's just that they don't hold up well in the applications I would use them for.
or you bored the seller to tears and he gave you the speakers for you to just fuck off?.Sup wrote:
10€ + blowjob?Freezer7Pro wrote:
Just for the record, how much do you think I paid for them?Morpheus wrote:
Actually, I'm sure the studio monitors are good... it's just that for larger scale stuff, there's better out there... although not as cheap.
Don't get me wrong, the price performance is actually pretty decent... it's just that they don't hold up well in the applications I would use them for.
Final answer..Sup wrote:
10€ or blowjob?Freezer7Pro wrote:
Just for the record, how much do you think I paid for them?Morpheus wrote:
Actually, I'm sure the studio monitors are good... it's just that for larger scale stuff, there's better out there... although not as cheap.
Don't get me wrong, the price performance is actually pretty decent... it's just that they don't hold up well in the applications I would use them for.
EE (hats
Harr harr.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
So was I right?
EE (hats
No, you were off by about $600.Morpheus wrote:
So was I right?
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP