Yes!SplinterStrike wrote:
Flight Deck+SRAW=fun
No ejection seat for those poor souls and its the ultimate 'im in ur base killing ur jetz" smack down!
Pages: 1 2
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 2 »
- Should the use of the AT kit on Inf servers be frowned upon?
Poll
Should using the Anti-Tank kit on Inf Only servers be frowned upon?
| Yes:The Eryx and Sraw should be used only against armor | 6% | 6% - 5 | ||||
| No: They are just another kind of explosive | 85% | 85% - 67 | ||||
| The kit should only use the DAO12 and Standart SMG | 1% | 1% - 1 | ||||
| They can be used but it is frowned upon | 6% | 6% - 5 | ||||
| Total: 78 | ||||||
No ejection seat for those poor souls and its the ultimate 'im in ur base killing ur jetz" smack down!
Well, there arent jets on the Gator, but there are lots of boats!TheTrueQuaid wrote:
Yes!SplinterStrike wrote:
Flight Deck+SRAW=fun
No ejection seat for those poor souls and its the ultimate 'im in ur base killing ur jetz" smack down!
lets frown upon things in a video game!
all is fair in war
edit: i really fucking hate gay server rules
edit: i really fucking hate gay server rules
Last edited by jsnipy (2010-02-11 20:46:20)
Yeah baby! Love it when a noob medic runs and jumps prone "Clear, clear!" and boooooom my 2nd rocket hit him! Idiot medics!SplinterStrike wrote:
Best anti medic weapon ever.
I rather use this as the G36E noob crap gun.
This nonsense again?Doctor Strangelove wrote:
Inf only servers should be frowned upon.
Personally, If we have infanty only server why dont we have like, Shotgun/Pistol/Knife/Shock/C4/AT servers. We should use the least used weapons more often! Can you imagine all the explosions in a C4/AT/Supply Server?
SplinterStrike wrote:
Flight Deck+SRAW=fun
Last edited by UK|Hooligan (2010-02-12 14:51:29)
Hahaha awesomeUK|Hooligan wrote:
http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb27 … een045.jpgSplinterStrike wrote:
Flight Deck+SRAW=fun
I don't see why it should, its just a secondary weapon like GL or grenades.
i thought grenades were a primary weapon nowadays the way ppl use themLostFate wrote:
I don't see why it should, its just a secondary weapon like GL or grenades.
Meh, annoys me having people use it against me, but I can deal with it.
Which one is the vote for yes they AT should be used to its fullest extent on every server and welcomed? Everyone knows AT sucks vs armor unless you have at least one other person playing it and a medic ready to revive nearby. It might as well be used to kill infantry.
Last edited by Evil_Black_Fox (2010-02-26 22:05:38)
I THINK THAT USING ANTI AIRCRAFT MISSLES IN AN IO SERVER SHOULD BE FROWNED UPON
C4 x5 = kicked/banned = LOLZUK|Hooligan wrote:
http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb27 … een045.jpgSplinterStrike wrote:
Flight Deck+SRAW=fun
LOLJaekus wrote:
C4 x5 = kicked/banned = LOLZUK|Hooligan wrote:
http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb27 … een045.jpgSplinterStrike wrote:
Flight Deck+SRAW=fun
If we ban a kit for being "too powerful" in IO, do we then power up other kits for being too weak in IO? eg. USMC/PLA engineer?
Keep it as-is. The AT kit is good on IO, but it has it's weaknesses. No nades, for one.
Keep it as-is. The AT kit is good on IO, but it has it's weaknesses. No nades, for one.
Last edited by Pubic (2010-03-01 16:15:00)
your kidding right the pump shotties are deadly if i could id always use them.Pubic wrote:
Ido we then power up other kits for being too weak in IO? eg. USMC/PLA engineer?.
Gator is again a great map for not only AT, but engi, that pump shotty is amazing around that boat.dill13 wrote:
your kidding right the pump shotties are deadly if i could id always use them.Pubic wrote:
Ido we then power up other kits for being too weak in IO? eg. USMC/PLA engineer?.
this MUST be an i/o screenshot...UK|Hooligan wrote:
Because none of those dudes would be alive if I had me HIND.
Nature is a powerful force. Those who seek to subdue nature, never do so permanently.
Can't be, there's a helicopter icon in the lower portion of the minimap, and if that thing is flying, then likely it could be killing the HIND over and over. And you can't spot a friendly heli.Mr.Dooomed wrote:
this MUST be an i/o screenshot...UK|Hooligan wrote:
http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb27 … een045.jpg
Because none of those dudes would be alive if I had me HIND.
Though I will agree, the Flight Deck is death to infantry when the HIND has air superiority.
Im affraid it MUST NOT be I.O. Dont forget, if some retard gets in the Hind then your all fucked if someone good gets in the Apache, hence the team loosing badly without even getting on the boat in the screenie.Mr.Dooomed wrote:
this MUST be an i/o screenshot...UK|Hooligan wrote:
http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb27 … een045.jpg
Because none of those dudes would be alive if I had me HIND.
A couple of decent snipers with M95 will sort it out lol until it comes back..SplinterStrike wrote:
Can't be, there's a helicopter icon in the lower portion of the minimap, and if that thing is flying, then likely it could be killing the HIND over and over. And you can't spot a friendly heli.Mr.Dooomed wrote:
this MUST be an i/o screenshot...UK|Hooligan wrote:
http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb27 … een045.jpg
Because none of those dudes would be alive if I had me HIND.
Though I will agree, the Flight Deck is death to infantry when the HIND has air superiority.
Is SF even played any more? Vanilla BF2 is completely dead now theres only a handful of populated servers- I can't be the only one who hasn't got a good enough PC to play BC2
Double post
Last edited by H3RB4L ABU53 (2010-03-03 04:14:48)
They're good close up, but IO isn't always close up, not to mention the lack of armour for those kits. MEC engy isn't so bad due to the semi-auto thing.dill13 wrote:
your kidding right the pump shotties are deadly if i could id always use them.Pubic wrote:
Ido we then power up other kits for being too weak in IO? eg. USMC/PLA engineer?.
Pages: 1 2
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 2 »
- Should the use of the AT kit on Inf servers be frowned upon?