SealXo
Member
+309|6928
easily one of the most fucked up things i have ever seen. im pretty disturbed after watching that.

an RPG is a good 5 feet long. a 2 foot 200mm lense on your 5D is nowhere near. And will someone please point out to me WHERE and WHO had AKs? I fail to see anyone armed throughout this whole video.

Last edited by SealXo (2010-04-05 17:05:58)

S3v3N
lolwut?
+685|6910|Montucky
This thread is an abortion.
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6892|so randum

S3v3N wrote:

This thread is an abortion.
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,820|6498|eXtreme to the maX
Trying to control an insurgency with helicopter gunships is fucking dumb.
Fuck Israel
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|7041

SealXo wrote:

easily one of the most fucked up things i have ever seen. im pretty disturbed after watching that.

an RPG is a good 5 feet long. a 2 foot 200mm lense on your 5D is nowhere near. And will someone please point out to me WHERE and WHO had AKs? I fail to see anyone armed throughout this whole video.
Oh look everyone, it's the Jewish Liberal media come to pass judgement on the troops!

...

Being a conservative is fun, I now see why you guys do it.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6993|132 and Bush

Dilbert_X wrote:

Trying to control an insurgency with helicopter gunships is fucking dumb.
Weren't they supporting troops on the ground?
Xbone Stormsurgezz
SealXo
Member
+309|6928

ghettoperson wrote:

SealXo wrote:

easily one of the most fucked up things i have ever seen. im pretty disturbed after watching that.

an RPG is a good 5 feet long. a 2 foot 200mm lense on your 5D is nowhere near. And will someone please point out to me WHERE and WHO had AKs? I fail to see anyone armed throughout this whole video.
Oh look everyone, it's the Jewish Liberal media come to pass judgement on the troops!

...

Being a conservative is fun, I now see why you guys do it.
?
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6892|so randum

Kmarion wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

Trying to control an insurgency with helicopter gunships is fucking dumb.
Weren't they supporting troops on the ground?
mhm.

choppa goes ahead, pops anything scary, troops roll in and mop up.

dilbert its not fucking rocket science, or do you like the idea of all the squaddies walking into deathtraps every time they hit town?
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
S3v3N
lolwut?
+685|6910|Montucky

Dilbert_X wrote:

Trying to control an insurgency with helicopter gunships is fucking dumb.
Trying to control an insurgency with a conventional military following conventional rules of engagement is fucking dumb.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5750|London, England

Kmarion wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Kmarion wrote:


Yes we take our cues from the majority of real world experience. No rationale person looks to a video game to learn right and wrong. I do not believe that video game experience desensitizes anyone to the reality of war. No one walks into a recruiting office and says I've taken life before based on their COD4 experience. No normal person at least. There is a very real difference and I am absolutely sure you understand that.
I do understand it completely but I don't think you are grasping the fact that the vast majority of soldiers play or have played video games, including war simulation games. It's not out of the scope of reality to expect a soldier to shout the same things he has heard in a video game. Things like "Get some" etc. In fact, it would be expected, since those phrases came from real life first and have been passed down through the ranks over generations. I bet if video footage had been taken of a marine squad in a similar situation those viewing, it such as those here in DST, would find their behavior to be even less 'professional'.
They've been shouting those things (which I've explained is understandable) for generations, long before video games. There is a distinguishable line between laughing at a game and the reality of someone rolling over a real person. Laughing in a game, and not laughing at it in a real situation is not hypocritical. I gathered that was your implication with Taz.
What would you rather they do, cry? At least they're displaying some emotion and not sitting there stone-facedly.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6993|132 and Bush

Employing the military to fight against an abstract idea is fucking dumb.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
SEREVENT
MASSIVE G STAR
+605|6499|Birmingham, UK
that was pretty disturbing to watch... especially seeing them run away
S3v3N
lolwut?
+685|6910|Montucky
Also critiquing a combat situation with no military experience is also fucking dumb.


Yeah I said it.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6993|132 and Bush

JohnG@lt wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

I do understand it completely but I don't think you are grasping the fact that the vast majority of soldiers play or have played video games, including war simulation games. It's not out of the scope of reality to expect a soldier to shout the same things he has heard in a video game. Things like "Get some" etc. In fact, it would be expected, since those phrases came from real life first and have been passed down through the ranks over generations. I bet if video footage had been taken of a marine squad in a similar situation those viewing, it such as those here in DST, would find their behavior to be even less 'professional'.
They've been shouting those things (which I've explained is understandable) for generations, long before video games. There is a distinguishable line between laughing at a game and the reality of someone rolling over a real person. Laughing in a game, and not laughing at it in a real situation is not hypocritical. I gathered that was your implication with Taz.
What would you rather they do, cry? At least they're displaying some emotion and not sitting there stone-facedly.
If you had read what I've been posting in this thread you would know that I am not saying their reaction was unacceptable or not understandable.

Kmarion wrote:

It's stress/adrenaline. Judging what they said while sitting comfortably behind a computer is not fair.

Kmarion wrote:

I was speaking to the point of what they said, and the laughter.. which is probably really why the pentagon didn't want to release this. Most people who have never experienced combat simply would not understand the emotional roller coaster. Testerone, the be all you can be, fuck you I'm better than enabler can show it's ugly side while communicating with your "brothers". It does not automatically equate to someone who is out of control.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6892|so randum
someone who guns down x amount of guys from whatever altitude and *doesnt* express any emotion is a shitton scarier than someone who hi5's.
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
S3v3N
lolwut?
+685|6910|Montucky

Kmarion wrote:

Most people who have never experienced combat simply would not understand the emotional roller coaster. Testerone, the be all you can be, fuck you I'm better than enabler can show it's ugly side while communicating with your "brothers". It does not automatically equate to someone who is out of control.
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|7041

Kmarion wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Kmarion wrote:


They've been shouting those things (which I've explained is understandable) for generations, long before video games. There is a distinguishable line between laughing at a game and the reality of someone rolling over a real person. Laughing in a game, and not laughing at it in a real situation is not hypocritical. I gathered that was your implication with Taz.
What would you rather they do, cry? At least they're displaying some emotion and not sitting there stone-facedly.
If you had read what I've been posting in this thread you would know that I am not saying their reaction was unacceptable or not understandable.

Kmarion wrote:

It's stress/adrenaline. Judging what they said while sitting comfortably behind a computer is not fair.

Kmarion wrote:

I was speaking to the point of what they said, and the laughter.. which is probably really why the pentagon didn't want to release this. Most people who have never experienced combat simply would not understand the emotional roller coaster. Testerone, the be all you can be, fuck you I'm better than enabler can show it's ugly side while communicating with your "brothers". It does not automatically equate to someone who is out of control.
You guys seem to be arguing a very similar point here...
S3v3N
lolwut?
+685|6910|Montucky
I remember after watching an arty strike, turning to my driver and saying "It needs more cowbell"   Does that make me a bad or psycho?
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,068|7164|PNW

I could be wrong, but isn't the press supposed to check in with the military?
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6993|132 and Bush

ghettoperson wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

What would you rather they do, cry? At least they're displaying some emotion and not sitting there stone-facedly.
If you had read what I've been posting in this thread you would know that I am not saying their reaction was unacceptable or not understandable.

Kmarion wrote:

It's stress/adrenaline. Judging what they said while sitting comfortably behind a computer is not fair.

Kmarion wrote:

I was speaking to the point of what they said, and the laughter.. which is probably really why the pentagon didn't want to release this. Most people who have never experienced combat simply would not understand the emotional roller coaster. Testerone, the be all you can be, fuck you I'm better than enabler can show it's ugly side while communicating with your "brothers". It does not automatically equate to someone who is out of control.
You guys seem to be arguing a very similar point here...
I get this a lot. When I try to make one point people assume I disagree with them on a variety of issues. Thinking for yourself means people have a tough time pigeonholing you.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5750|London, England

Kmarion wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

What would you rather they do, cry? At least they're displaying some emotion and not sitting there stone-facedly.
If you had read what I've been posting in this thread you would know that I am not saying their reaction was unacceptable or not understandable.

Kmarion wrote:

It's stress/adrenaline. Judging what they said while sitting comfortably behind a computer is not fair.
You guys seem to be arguing a very similar point here...
I get this a lot. When I try to make one point people assume I disagree with them on a variety of issues. Thinking for yourself means people have a tough time pigeonholing you.
Thing is, I wasn't arguing with you in my original quote of you. I was agreeing and expanding on it
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|7041

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

I could be wrong, but isn't the press supposed to check in with the military?
BUT THEY PURPOSELY MURDERED AN INNOCENT CIVILIAN!!

@Kerry: it just seems like you guys are caught up in the semantics of people being excited to shoot at people. It really doesn't matter, you're agreeing with each other; now get back to arguing with retards like Otto.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6993|132 and Bush

JohnG@lt wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:


You guys seem to be arguing a very similar point here...
I get this a lot. When I try to make one point people assume I disagree with them on a variety of issues. Thinking for yourself means people have a tough time pigeonholing you.
Thing is, I wasn't arguing with you in my original quote of you. I was agreeing and expanding on it
Well, you asked me if I'd rather they cried. Might have misinterpreted the tone.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6993|132 and Bush

ghettoperson wrote:

@Kerry: it just seems like you guys are caught up in the semantics of people being excited to shoot at people. It really doesn't matter, you're agreeing with each other; now get back to arguing with retards like Otto.
That seemed to be a major issue for some here.

I'm personally more interested in hearing about this mythical war where no civilians are killed. Intent matters. A point that seriously lacks in this thread.

The gunships followed procedure. If procedure is wrong then it needs to be addressed.
Of course if we limited access to journalist in a war zone then someone is trying to hide something.. right?

There is no absolute answer here.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Ilocano
buuuurrrrrrppppp.......
+341|7059

Kmarion wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

I get this a lot. When I try to make one point people assume I disagree with them on a variety of issues. Thinking for yourself means people have a tough time pigeonholing you.
Thing is, I wasn't arguing with you in my original quote of you. I was agreeing and expanding on it
Well, you asked me if I'd rather they cried. Might have misinterpreted the tone.
Fight, fight, fight!!!...



Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard