Are multiple Chats threads necessary? And why the AU Chat was closed.

2010-07-03 19:00:46

#1

OrangeHound: Busy doing highfalutin adminy stuff ...; +1,335|6894|Washington DC

(1) The original AU Chat thread was closed because it was causing problems with the forum software.

(2) A replacement AU Chat thread was started.

(3) It got shut down ... right now the shut down is temporary.

The AU Chats Thread was one of those game server based threads that had been around prior to EE Chats, and no longer has the same game server focus ... it is just another chat thread. So, we're processing the question as to whether or not to have lots of chat threads, or perhaps just a single EE Chat thread.

Feel free to leave any comments ...

2010-07-03 19:01:46

#2

RTHKI: mmmf mmmf mmmf; +1,741|6982|Cinncinatti

au chat 2 is reopened

Last edited by RTHKI (2010-07-03 19:02:18)

2010-07-03 19:02:29

#3

eskimo_sammyjoe: Did someone say tea?; +112|6480|S.A. Australia

If the new thread isn't causing any problems with the rest of the site, who cares? We enjoy chatting amongst ourselves in there and regardless of what you say, it isn't the same as posting in the ee chats.

Serious Flex

2010-07-03 19:03:19

#4

11 Bravo: Banned; +965|5482|Cleveland, Ohio

no need for chats threads, hence what IRC is for. people dont own sections of this forum, no matter what they think.

2010-07-03 19:04:00

#5

RTHKI: mmmf mmmf mmmf; +1,741|6982|Cinncinatti

people seem to rarely be active on the bf2s irc

2010-07-03 19:04:16

#6

OrangeHound: Busy doing highfalutin adminy stuff ...; +1,335|6894|Washington DC

RTHKI wrote:
au chat 2 is reopened

McMinty feels that the weekend is a bad time to make a command decision like this ...

2010-07-03 19:05:02

#7

mtb0minime: minimember; +2,418|6900

No offense to the Aussies, you all know I ♥ you, but the AU Chat is unnecessary. While it originally discussed server activity, it's become a typical EE Chat thread. Besides, enough non-AU people post in the AU Chat anyway, so it's not exactly AU exclusive. Lastly, it'll be better to have the main EE Chat thread constantly active instead of having dead times with the AU Chat randomly at the top of recent posts.

2010-07-03 19:05:08

#8

jord: Member; +2,382|6923|The North, beyond the wall.

I think if it stays closed some aussie members will leave, so if eskimo sammyjoe is one of those aformentioned members I'm all for its closure.

2010-07-03 19:07:33

#9

eskimo_sammyjoe: Did someone say tea?; +112|6480|S.A. Australia

Is the new au chats slowing down the rest of the site?

Serious Flex

2010-07-03 19:09:27

#10

11 Bravo: Banned; +965|5482|Cleveland, Ohio

OrangeHound wrote:
RTHKI wrote:
au chat 2 is reopened
McMinty feels that the weekend is a bad time to make a command decision like this ...

gee go figure.....

2010-07-03 19:09:42

#11

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6398|what

41587 replies. 444765 views.

Reason enough for a new AU thread to remain open.

2010-07-03 19:10:01

#12

RTHKI: mmmf mmmf mmmf; +1,741|6982|Cinncinatti

eskimo_sammyjoe wrote:
Is the new au chats slowing down the rest of the site?

no, but the rest of the chats are still closed i believe

and aussie we all know ee chats would annihilate au chat if it wasnt monthly, but then the site would probably be dead now

Last edited by RTHKI (2010-07-03 19:11:22)

2010-07-03 19:10:24

#13

Jaekus: I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose; +957|5423|Sydney

Does it really matter if the second one is open? If you don't like it, don't post in it or visit it. It's tucked away in its own subsection of the forums and has more relevance than half the trash threads that are posted in the EE forum.

2010-07-03 19:10:34

#14

11 Bravo: Banned; +965|5482|Cleveland, Ohio

AussieReaper wrote:
41587 replies. 444765 views.

Reason enough for a new AU thread to remain open.

spam and 4chan pictures? there are threads already for spam and 4chan pictures. ee chats blows your shit away anyway. so go there. you aint special.

2010-07-03 19:11:38

#15

eskimo_sammyjoe: Did someone say tea?; +112|6480|S.A. Australia

RTHKI wrote:
eskimo_sammyjoe wrote:
Is the new au chats slowing down the rest of the site?
no, but the rest of the chats are still closed i believe

and aussie we all know ee chats would annihilate au chat if it wasnt monthly, but then the site would probably be dead now

Because you lot never used them

Last edited by eskimo_sammyjoe (2010-07-03 19:12:53)

Serious Flex

2010-07-03 19:12:11

#16

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6398|what

11 Bravo wrote:
AussieReaper wrote:
41587 replies. 444765 views.

Reason enough for a new AU thread to remain open.
spam and 4chan pictures? there are threads already for spam and 4chan pictures. ee chats blows your shit away anyway. so go there. you aint special.

Yeah because of the forty thousand replies they were all spam.

2010-07-03 19:12:16

#17

mtb0minime: minimember; +2,418|6900

The purpose of EE Chats was to keep all the spammy banter to one thread. AU Chats has become the exact same thing. In order to minimize spam and accomplish the objective, the threads dedicated to containing spam need to be amalgamated into a singular thread.

2010-07-03 19:14:04

#18

RTHKI: mmmf mmmf mmmf; +1,741|6982|Cinncinatti

eskimo_sammyjoe wrote:
RTHKI wrote:
eskimo_sammyjoe wrote:
Is the new au chats slowing down the rest of the site?
no, but the rest of the chats are still closed i believe

and aussie we all know ee chats would annihilate au chat if it wasnt monthly, but then the site would probably be dead now
Because you lot never used them

because we use ee chats

2010-07-03 19:15:06

#19

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6398|what

1% of all posts on bf2s were made in that single thread.

2010-07-03 19:15:20

#20

mtb0minime: minimember; +2,418|6900

RTHKI wrote:
eskimo_sammyjoe wrote:
RTHKI wrote:

no, but the rest of the chats are still closed i believe

and aussie we all know ee chats would annihilate au chat if it wasnt monthly, but then the site would probably be dead now
Because you lot never used them
because we use ee chats

And when we did use them, they got closed. Hmmmmmmmmmmmm............................

2010-07-03 19:16:39

#21

11 Bravo: Banned; +965|5482|Cleveland, Ohio

AussieReaper wrote:
1% of all posts on bf2s were made in that single thread.

and? it slowed the site down. so, go pay for your own forum and bandwith.

2010-07-03 19:16:45

#22

eskimo_sammyjoe: Did someone say tea?; +112|6480|S.A. Australia

They were only closed recently because when au went down, went got dragged there for some reason.

Serious Flex

2010-07-03 19:20:08

#23

11 Bravo: Banned; +965|5482|Cleveland, Ohio

simple concept, OH.....if AU 2 is kept open, then all those that you closed should be reopened. I am going to make one for the state I live in right now. cool?

2010-07-03 19:21:41

#24

11 Bravo: Banned; +965|5482|Cleveland, Ohio

or maybe an official current and former military members chat thread? is that cool?

2010-07-03 19:22:14

#25

OrangeHound: Busy doing highfalutin adminy stuff ...; +1,335|6894|Washington DC

11 Bravo wrote:
simple concept, OH.....if AU 2 is kept open, then all those that you closed should be reopened. I am going to make one for the state I live in right now. cool?

Good logic ... but let's hold off on that idea, mkay?

BF2S Forums Are multiple Chats threads necessary? And why the AU Chat was closed.

RTHKI wrote:

OrangeHound wrote:

RTHKI wrote:

eskimo_sammyjoe wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

RTHKI wrote:

eskimo_sammyjoe wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

eskimo_sammyjoe wrote:

RTHKI wrote:

eskimo_sammyjoe wrote:

RTHKI wrote:

eskimo_sammyjoe wrote:

RTHKI wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:

Board footer