The Europeans should have Christianized their migrants or turned them back by force.

How is that the EU's fault?Dilbert_X wrote:
I dunno, letting migrants build camps en route to the UK?
Again, how is that the EU's fault?Helping migrants cross the channel to the UK?
Fucking what? You mean to tell me the UK delegation sat in the negotiation chair like a flock of lame ducks when these regulations were formulated?Rigging EU regulations to benefit French and German companies?
Countries are primarily responsible for enforcing EU rules in their own territories. The EU has no such capacity - it can only impose sentences via the ECJ IF someone decided to escalate up to that level of ruling.Enforcing EU rules unevenly?
fixed it for you. if that^ doesn't smell of fabrication i don't know what does.uziq wrote:
novichok found on bottle of water in tomsk hotel room which was supposedly removed from the scene of supposed crime by navalny crew and later given to german authorities
very well then. all that remains to be proven is that the substance they call "novichok" has been used to poison him in russia.The German chancellor, Angela Merkel, said earlier this month that tests carried out in Germany showed “unequivocally” that the nerve agent was used to poison Navalny.
so they do know which exact poison was used then, don't they? why aren't they telling?The same poison was used in the attack on Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia in Salisbury in 2018.
all that was corroborated is that there was a certain poison in certain people's system. who put it there is another matter entirely.so, just as the dutch intelligence authorities corroborated the findings of the UK on the salisbury case
there's no need for formal conspiracy when interests converge.wow! all of europe conspiring
unlike you, i don't make any claims here. as i said numerous times, i will agree with you when evidence is shown. nothing conclusive has been provided so far.let's watch shahter deny this one
really? why?Larssen wrote:
Shahter, whoever put that novichok in him either is a member of the intelligence services or is cleared to the extent that they can obtain it from the intelligence services.
and since then the soviet union collapsed and all the info on the stuff is available publicly and accessible by, basically, anyone.Novichok was created in the soviet union for use against NATO targets.
or CIA. or MI6. or SBU. the list goes on.You do the math. Whatever way you twist this, either the GRU or FSB is involved.
shahter seems to be lost in some convoluted, scientifically illiterate argument. 'novichok' does not actually refer to any specific chemical: rather a family of about 4-5 variations thereof. because the news reports are all referring to 'novichok' as a somewhat sensationalist label (anthrax! sarin!), he thinks they haven't provided any evidence of an actual chemical. in reality, western intelligence are aware of the family of chemicals known as novichok, they can test for them, they have been chemically identified, etc. but the news reports don't name the specific substance; ergo, it's a bullshit lie. very confusing reasoning.Larssen wrote:
Shahter, whoever put that novichok in him either is a member of the intelligence services or is cleared to the extent that they can obtain it from the intelligence services.
Novichok was created in the soviet union for use against NATO targets. You do the math. Whatever way you twist this, either the GRU or FSB is involved.
Last edited by uziq (2020-09-19 08:16:02)
Last edited by Larssen (2020-09-19 08:26:58)
and they said they will. after OPCW or NATO or whoever wants them to investigate makes a fucking case. press briefing by merkel is not that.uziq wrote:
well, they've referred the case to the organisation for the prohibition of chemical weapons (OPCW), and NATO are now pressuring the russian government to comply with this international investigation. all you boys have to do is cooperate and clear your good names, right? shouldn't be hard.
i'm not hopeful, but we'll see.or maybe you can conveniently claim, even with international investigations and impartial-scientific bodies, that 'the truth can never prevail'?
unlike you, i'm not talking whole countries here. i'm talking political factions and those who bankroll them.what interests converging, by the way? it's in germany's interests to turn on nordstream 2. what interests does a country like france have in scuppering nordstream?
they are.you do realise there are still natural gas projects going through turkey, largely providing the same european countries? why aren't those mysteriously being cancelled or held up?
for a whole EU or its member nations, like germany? - no, it doesn't. for factions within their politics and capitalist elites? - it very much could.it doesn't make any fucking sense to sabotage a hugely expensive project that europe has PAID FOR and nearly completed.
so-called 'turkstream' opened in january. it's working fine. why wasn't this cancelled or why wasn't navalny assassinated before this one?they are
LOL okay. shadow groups and splinter cells are operating within the german 'deep state'.for factions within their politics and capitalist elites? - it very much could.
Last edited by uziq (2020-09-19 08:42:14)
uh-huh. so you do agree that it's not only russia who has access to the shit. very good.Larssen wrote:
Making novichok is a multimillion industrial process that is chemically complicated and not public knowledge. The only entities that would consider such a venture are countries, specifically the (military) intelligence community. It remained a close guarded secret despite the collapse of the SU and only became known in the west in the 90s.
whatever. i'm still waiting for the evidence.We now have a pattern of people who you consider 'western puppets' being poisoned with novichok. Skripal is a former GRU employee and was a double agent for the west. We know how you feel about navalny. The pussy riot guy also showed similar symptoms.
after they sucked the "allies" dry - why not? navalny, who's a convicted felon, has no ratings and generally does fuck all is a lot less useful than navalny poisoned by "horrible radioactive nerve agent" by putin the tyrant. same goes for skripal.It is bizarre that you would rather conjure a convoluted conspiracy theory to explain away these attacks that would necessarily include the west turning on its own allies
there are innumerable ways those "allies" to the west could nave been disposed off reliably. instead, the "intelligence agencies" - which, you claim, must be behind these incidents - chose a weapon-grade nerve agent. which is about as good an assassination tool as a wet noodle. and failed miserably three times - is that it? well, you know, we have very different notions of "obvious" you and i.instead of just pointing the finger at the obvious suspects.
Last edited by Larssen (2020-09-19 08:53:26)
no. they are the ones with access to the shit though.uziq wrote:
i am literally flabbergasted. you think MI6 and the CIA are doing the novichok poisonings?
ultimately - to kick russia out of the contested markets.so the british, who gave shelter to skripal in the first place, then conspired to murder him ... in the process killing british civilians/police officers ... and then rushed to shut down an entire british town ... and then gave him and his daughter intensive medical treatment ... and then arranged for them to go into hiding/protection, assume new identities, etc. ... but really we wanted to kill them in the first place? but we failed? or only wanted to half-kill them? for what motive?
Last edited by uziq (2020-09-19 09:03:18)
well, the genie has been out of the bottle for a long time now. and it wasn't russia who let it out by not giving a fuck about international law.Larssen wrote:
Plausible deniability in an age where rule of international law is the supposed be-all end-all is a cruel reality. I'm not particularly interested in the public legal investigations; we already know this couldn't be done by anyone but an intelligence agency. A multi-year investigative process lead by country X against country Y within that context won't lead to anything.
yeah, yeah. let's fight one another for the profits of our respective capitalist elites.If the NATO intelligence services are sure enough in their attribution of this attack to Russia, that is what policy and next steps should be based on. It's a mess because ultimately it's a crime by the russian state against one of its citizens within its own territory, but should be seen in the larger picture of an ever more belligerent Putin attempting to move through internal and international politics by way of (violent) domination and repression. All whilst taking care to not exceed NATO article 5 definitions of acts of war.
none of which has ever been done by the enlightened west, of course.Meanwhile there's media & political interference, hacking into critical systems, assassinations, proxy wars, trade-as-a-weapon all deployed at the same time.
I would say a weapons grade difficult to detect nerve agent is a rather good way of getting rid of someone. The catch is that intelligence agency Y won't know if intelligence agency X is aware of said nerve agent and knows what to look for.Shahter wrote:
there are innumerable ways those "allies" to the west could nave been disposed off reliably. instead, the "intelligence agencies" - which, you claim, must be behind these incidents - chose a weapon-grade nerve agent. which is about as good an assassination tool as a wet noodle. and failed miserably three times - is that it? well, you know, we have very different notions of "obvious" you and i.
Last edited by Larssen (2020-09-19 09:06:00)
uh-huh.uziq wrote:
what contested markets? europe and russia have a mutually beneficial arrangement with natural gas/gazprom.
therewhat are the alternatives, here?
no.you think a militant deep state shadow organization of german greens are using russian chemical weapons to murder international figures?
they know, how to check for it. they know, how to treat the poisoning. but they don't know, how to produce it? and i'm the conspiracy theorist here.it's really funny to me that your mantra in this thread has been 'evidence, evidence, evidence', and yet you casually claim that MI6 and the CIA 'have access to novichok'. errrrm, citation please??? where is the fucking EVIDENCE for this?
Last edited by Shahter (2020-09-19 09:21:24)
Last edited by uziq (2020-09-19 09:22:50)
OR the whole spectacle is a deliberate fabrication. just as plausible, imo. more plausible, in fact - checks all the boxes and answers all the questions.Larssen wrote:
I would say a weapons grade difficult to detect nerve agent is a rather good way of getting rid of someone. The catch is that intelligence agency Y won't know if intelligence agency X is aware of said nerve agent and knows what to look for.
Furthermore, perhaps a low-dose not absolutely fatal attack may be intentional. They may also be field testing different variants. OR they indeed just failed.
orly? was the outcry and the sanctions that followed included in that assessment? because the life of human trash like skripal and navalny against risk of having one of the most important putin & co's pet project like nord stream 2 shut down is pretty fucking obvious choice imo.I'm sure an adequate assessment was made of possible consequences.
i'm not and have never been anywhere near "the world of intelligence". but applying simple logic to the story with navalny being poisoned by "novichok" i can confidently say - one thing the whole schtick simply cannot do without is people poisoning the fucker being utterly insane. regardless of what really happened in salisbury, just seeing how it all turned out, no "intelligence agency" in their right mind would choose to poison navalny with the same shit.In the world of intelligence there's usually...
Last edited by uziq (2020-09-19 09:46:17)