Such as a P90, MP5 or UMP?Doctor Strangelove wrote:
Or dual wield two handed wepon.
Last edited by DUnlimited (2011-05-14 13:58:08)
Some people enjoy a challenge and some sort of feeling of accomplishment.Camm wrote:
that's what's fun about moder warfare, there is NO skill curve, so you can jump right in and play. what's the problem with that?
Its the same engine.Kampframmer wrote:
But in all seriousness, i just hope they manage to implement some new functions to keep the game fun (they probably wont)
And maybe make a new and improved engine (or at least pretend that they've polished up the one they've been using since cod4 by making guns more shiny)
Go play arma.DefCon-17 wrote:
Some people enjoy a challenge and some sort of feeling of accomplishment.Camm wrote:
that's what's fun about moder warfare, there is NO skill curve, so you can jump right in and play. what's the problem with that?
Strange, I know.
Go play console (so we don't have to read absolutely fucking retarded comments like your previous two)Camm wrote:
Go play arma.DefCon-17 wrote:
Some people enjoy a challenge and some sort of feeling of accomplishment.Camm wrote:
that's what's fun about moder warfare, there is NO skill curve, so you can jump right in and play. what's the problem with that?
Strange, I know.
Last edited by DUnlimited (2011-05-16 17:51:20)
Martyrdom pro pro - when you die, you drop a nuke which ends the game and kills everyone. lololKampframmer wrote:
I want Pro-Pro perks.
Warlord PP: 4 attachments
Commando PP: Knife through walls
Scavenger PP: Steal all of an enemies (dead or alive) ammo when you walk by.
You guys make up the rest.
Fuck.KuSTaV wrote:
Its the same engine.Kampframmer wrote:
But in all seriousness, i just hope they manage to implement some new functions to keep the game fun (they probably wont)
And maybe make a new and improved engine (or at least pretend that they've polished up the one they've been using since cod4 by making guns more shiny)
more phongKampframmer wrote:
Fuck.KuSTaV wrote:
Its the same engine.Kampframmer wrote:
But in all seriousness, i just hope they manage to implement some new functions to keep the game fun (they probably wont)
And maybe make a new and improved engine (or at least pretend that they've polished up the one they've been using since cod4 by making guns more shiny)
Now I bet that they havent taken the trouble to improve the damn thing.
they'll just make the graphics look sort of better, but its still the same shit.
Lol no.DUnlimited wrote:
Go play console (so we don't have to read absolutely fucking retarded comments like your previous two)Camm wrote:
Go play arma.DefCon-17 wrote:
Some people enjoy a challenge and some sort of feeling of accomplishment.
Strange, I know.
not that hard to make a game that's easy to pick up, but hard to get good at...Camm wrote:
Lol no.DUnlimited wrote:
Go play console (so we don't have to read absolutely fucking retarded comments like your previous two)Camm wrote:
Go play arma.
CoD of late has become a game to dip into and play for a little while without the need to actually learn how to play it. That's why it's so popular, because it's easy to play. Not everyone wants to play a game that takes them months to get even slightly decent at. Not everyone is a hardcore gamer. Not everyone has the time to learn how to play a game so that they're good at it. And not everyone wants to spend all their time at a pc. There is a world beyond your desk btw.
I like BC2s ranking. It wasnt too slow like BF2 (imo), but it wasnt too fats like CoD. In BC2 i see like 10+ rank 50s, which is okey considering taht the game has been out so long. 2 Weeks after a cod releasy you already see people that have prestige'd. After a few months most people ar 5-6th prestige and a lot are max rank.Trotskygrad wrote:
not that hard to make a game that's easy to pick up, but hard to get good at...Camm wrote:
Lol no.DUnlimited wrote:
Go play console (so we don't have to read absolutely fucking retarded comments like your previous two)
CoD of late has become a game to dip into and play for a little while without the need to actually learn how to play it. That's why it's so popular, because it's easy to play. Not everyone wants to play a game that takes them months to get even slightly decent at. Not everyone is a hardcore gamer. Not everyone has the time to learn how to play a game so that they're good at it. And not everyone wants to spend all their time at a pc. There is a world beyond your desk btw.
BC2 isn't that hard to pick up, but it's harder to get good at than MW, significantly
BC2 is kinda shit at the same time on 360. People just buy all the unlocks with microsoft points, which is pretty gay.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
The thing I like the most about BC2's ranking system is that you can get all the unlocks in about 20 hours, even if you're just playing regularly. But once you got them all you're only a fraction of the way through the ranks, so are given incentive to play once you get all the unlocks.
In the CoD games you are done with the rank ups once you get all the guns, so you don't spend much time with the later weapons. And the BF2 ranking system required you to play for nearly 100 hours before you could get all the weapons, which was intimidating for many people.
tbh just add REALLY useless crap after the main unlocks... like weapons that are just underbalanced, and WWII shitDoctor Strangelove wrote:
The thing I like the most about BC2's ranking system is that you can get all the unlocks in about 20 hours, even if you're just playing regularly. But once you got them all you're only a fraction of the way through the ranks, so are given incentive to play once you get all the unlocks.
In the CoD games you are done with the rank ups once you get all the guns, so you don't spend much time with the later weapons. And the BF2 ranking system required you to play for nearly 100 hours before you could get all the weapons, which was intimidating for many people.
Funny how the CoD fanboys probably play more than Quake or CS players.Camm wrote:
Lol no.DUnlimited wrote:
Go play console (so we don't have to read absolutely fucking retarded comments like your previous two)Camm wrote:
Go play arma.
CoD of late has become a game to dip into and play for a little while without the need to actually learn how to play it. That's why it's so popular, because it's easy to play. Not everyone wants to play a game that takes them months to get even slightly decent at. Not everyone is a hardcore gamer. Not everyone has the time to learn how to play a game so that they're good at it. And not everyone wants to spend all their time at a pc. There is a world beyond your desk btw.
that's a really shitty argument.Camm wrote:
Lol no.DUnlimited wrote:
Go play console (so we don't have to read absolutely fucking retarded comments like your previous two)Camm wrote:
Go play arma.
CoD of late has become a game to dip into and play for a little while without the need to actually learn how to play it. That's why it's so popular, because it's easy to play. Not everyone wants to play a game that takes them months to get even slightly decent at. Not everyone is a hardcore gamer. Not everyone has the time to learn how to play a game so that they're good at it. And not everyone wants to spend all their time at a pc. There is a world beyond your desk btw.
Yes, for us who enjoy a challenge. But at video gaming's current state, we aren't it's cash-cow. We are a niche. There's a reason The Sims and WoW are still top profit franchises.Uzique wrote:
the vast majority of people, as with everything, are fucking morons and are deserving of contempt. some standard must exist and a modicum of challenge should be preserved; games are for actively playing and competing, not for passively completing and cake-walking.