TSI wrote:
Pochsy wrote:
TSI wrote:
Nicely done.
For the first time in my academic career, I'm going to have to actually so some research for an essay. How did this happen?
What? Or do you mean in-depth research? How do you take 15 courses and not have to read an article or two get the page numbers to hit the citation requirements...
I've alwasy done it the other way around: I write what I know, then look up specific articles/books/whatever that substantiate my arguments for citations. Basically, I've always been in a situation where I choose to write about stuff I know, whether through specific thesis choice or general course choice.
Also, it's such bullshit that you have to reference everything. Why is it that no student is supposedly capable of producing original material? (I'm not talking about empirical evidence, ofc, more about analytical positions or philosophical arguments).
Ah, I get it. Yeah, in that case I pretty well do the same more often than not. Your definition of research is just more narrow than my own. Often it works out that in the process of trying to legitimize my own opinions by finding someone who said it first, I run into an argument I had not considered which can strengthen my position.
I think they simply don't expect you to be able to use the same diction as a preexisting expression of the position, or to produce the same series of syllogisms with the exact same caveats. I think to an extent they realize there is simply shit we all take for granted, and that nobody is going to site Thucydides for their use of Realism.
Last edited by Pochsy (2012-10-12 18:12:08)
The shape of an eye in front of the ocean, digging for stones and throwing them against its window pane. Take it down dreamer, take it down deep. - Other Families