yes - but, nigerians scammed is stil
Shouldn't have gotten caught.
see ya everbody!
Hairless bear!
He looks sad
He looks sad
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
what the fuck is that thing
get it off my pc
get it off my pc
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Centralization doesn't mean fascism. It just mean authority is concentrated. Concentrated authority could be used to protect rights for instance. Take note of enlightened despotism. Rousseau's "forcing people to be free" is in the same vein. Power and authority to protect. American liberals follow this by believing that an expanded government could best protect them, their liberty, and their rights. American conservatives, and by extension libertarians see this (protection of liberty) being achieved with less government involvement. Same shit, different approach.Jay wrote:
Centralization of authority is generally considered to be an aspect of conservatism in America. It's associated with fascism, and prior to that, the tyranny of kings. Liberalism, before the word lost its real meaning, meant the pursuit of liberty, the exact opposite of its present meaning. Both political parties in America are conservative and authoritarian. Rather than being true antagonists that fight over the design and purpose of our government, they are instead like an old married couple that fight over the shape, color, and size of the doilies in the sitting room.Macbeth wrote:
conservative centralization?
What the fuck is that? lol Sounds like you are just taking terms and putting them together to try and sound smart
Both parties are authoritarian in some ways as any other government but they are nowhere near fascist and are very much on the liberal side of things.
Anyway, tell me what is the most libertarian government or country in the world right now? In history?
It's a bear with a disease that makes its fur fall off.FatherTed wrote:
what the fuck is that thing
get it off my pc
eh? She only scammed them by trying to embezzle all the money she was to transfer. The only difference between her and someone stealing from their job is the fact that she was unknowingly working for criminals.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Meh, she still took the fall.
no hair kinda emphasizes the size of the claws.Jay wrote:
Hairless bear!
He looks sad
The fact that you believe that enlightened despotism can actually exist, let alone that it is a desirable outcome, tells me all I need to know about you. Concentrated power always leads to despotism. There can be no other outcome. If the power exists, it will be used to control others and bend them to the will of whoever wields that power. But, you hate humanity and have the ego of Ayn Rand, so it appeals to you and your desire to manipulate and control others.Macbeth wrote:
Centralization doesn't mean fascism. It just mean authority is concentrated. Concentrated authority could be used to protect rights for instance. Take note of enlightened despotism. Rousseau's "forcing people to be free" is in the same vein. Power and authority to protect. American liberals follow this by believing that an expanded government could best protect them, their liberty, and their rights. American conservatives, and by extension libertarians see this (protection of liberty) being achieved with less government involvement. Same shit, different approach.Jay wrote:
Centralization of authority is generally considered to be an aspect of conservatism in America. It's associated with fascism, and prior to that, the tyranny of kings. Liberalism, before the word lost its real meaning, meant the pursuit of liberty, the exact opposite of its present meaning. Both political parties in America are conservative and authoritarian. Rather than being true antagonists that fight over the design and purpose of our government, they are instead like an old married couple that fight over the shape, color, and size of the doilies in the sitting room.Macbeth wrote:
conservative centralization?
What the fuck is that? lol Sounds like you are just taking terms and putting them together to try and sound smart
Both parties are authoritarian in some ways as any other government but they are nowhere near fascist and are very much on the liberal side of things.
Anyway, tell me what is the most libertarian government or country in the world right now? In history?
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enlightened_absolutismJay wrote:
The fact that you believe that enlightened despotism can actually exist, let alone that it is a desirable outcome, tells me all I need to know about you. Concentrated power always leads to despotism. There can be no other outcome. If the power exists, it will be used to control others and bend them to the will of whoever wields that power. But, you hate humanity and have the ego of Ayn Rand, so it appeals to you and your desire to manipulate and control others.Macbeth wrote:
Centralization doesn't mean fascism. It just mean authority is concentrated. Concentrated authority could be used to protect rights for instance. Take note of enlightened despotism. Rousseau's "forcing people to be free" is in the same vein. Power and authority to protect. American liberals follow this by believing that an expanded government could best protect them, their liberty, and their rights. American conservatives, and by extension libertarians see this (protection of liberty) being achieved with less government involvement. Same shit, different approach.Jay wrote:
Centralization of authority is generally considered to be an aspect of conservatism in America. It's associated with fascism, and prior to that, the tyranny of kings. Liberalism, before the word lost its real meaning, meant the pursuit of liberty, the exact opposite of its present meaning. Both political parties in America are conservative and authoritarian. Rather than being true antagonists that fight over the design and purpose of our government, they are instead like an old married couple that fight over the shape, color, and size of the doilies in the sitting room.
Both parties are authoritarian in some ways as any other government but they are nowhere near fascist and are very much on the liberal side of things.
Anyway, tell me what is the most libertarian government or country in the world right now? In history?
Has existed. It's totally a term that has meaning and is used by people who study politics and stuff.
As for the Ayn Rand thing- you named your account here JohnG@lt sooo lol . Hell your user title is still a reference to your old account name. You should change that.
Still name a libertarian country or the closest thing to it.
>Come in EE and read DST wank.
Go to au chats, find OH closing it. . . :\Jaekus wrote:
>Come in EE and read DST wank.
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO13urnzz wrote:
Go to au chats, find OH closing it. . . :\Jaekus wrote:
>Come in EE and read DST wank.
I know everything!
No! I know everything!
No! I know everything!
paragraph wrote:
Paragraphparagraphparagraph Paragraphparagraphparagraph Paragraphparagraphparagraph Paragraphparagraphparagraph Paragraphparagraphparagraph Paragraphparagraphparagraph Paragraphparagraphparagraph Paragraphparagraphparagraph Paragraphparagraphparagraph Paragraphparagraphparagraph Paragraphparagraphparagraph Paragraphparagraphparagraph Paragraphparagraphparagraph Paragraphparagraphparagraph Paragraphparagraphparagraph Paragraphparagraphparagraph Paragraphparagraphparagraph Paragraphparagraphparagraphparagraph wrote:
Paragraphparagraphparagraph Paragraphparagraphparagraph Paragraphparagraphparagraph Paragraphparagraphparagraph Paragraphparagraphparagraph Paragraphparagraphparagraph Paragraphparagraphparagraph Paragraphparagraphparagraph Paragraphparagraphparagraph Paragraphparagraphparagraph Paragraphparagraphparagraph Paragraphparagraphparagraph Paragraphparagraphparagraph Paragraphparagraphparagraph Paragraphparagraphparagraph Paragraphparagraphparagraph Paragraphparagraphparagraph Paragraphparagraphparagraph
This will be over as soon as Jay admits either
A) He doesn't know what he is talking about
B) Macbeth knows more about what we are talking about than he does
A) He doesn't know what he is talking about
B) Macbeth knows more about what we are talking about than he does
Last edited by Macbeth (2012-02-24 15:39:57)
what are we talking about?
Wanking.13urnzz wrote:
what are we talking about?
what I posted burnzzzzzzzzzz.
Badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger-Whiteroom- wrote:
what I posted burnzzzzzzzzzz.
MUSHROOM
A snake! A scary, scary snake!
Jaekus wrote:
Badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger-Whiteroom- wrote:
what I posted burnzzzzzzzzzz.
MUSHROOM
aussie wrote:
aussie aussie aussie
oi wrote:
oi oi oi
- Superior Mind
- (not macbeth)
- +1,755|7081
That's what we look like to furry animals.Jay wrote:
Hairless bear!
He looks sad
To be great is to be misunderstood.
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.