MaximumMayhem
Member
+27|7256|Mashtuur Boulevard
http://www.gizmag.com.au/go/4785/

Commander's Revenge.. a UAV that can shoot back at you!
SmilingBuddha
You laughin' at me, bitch?
+44|7255|Hong Kong
looks weird
T4rd
Member
+44|7282|West Point, NY
Good idea to put this in the 1.3 patch, haha.  Mabye be able to remotely control it as the commander and shoot down people.. hahaha.. that would piss a loooott of people off, I think.

Last edited by T4rd (2006-02-28 06:29:36)

a1911
Member
+0|7243
There is a shooting UAV also in C&C Generals
Arkanon
Member
+3|7301|London, UK
They're not going to need soldiers at this rate. Which is bad news. Bush can just send a flock of these fuckers out to do his bidding.
chittydog
less busy
+586|7441|Kubra, Damn it!

How is that bad news? Do you think it's better to have our people out there getting killed? You're either a moron or a sadist.
pokerplaya
want to go heads up?
+11|7340|cairns australia
nz built with aussie help.with our weapon that shoots a million rounds a minute mounted to that with a couple of hellfires =pwn.it would take expert gamers like ourselves to operate such a machine.Click here to watch aussie-invention
Z-trooper
BF2s' little helper
+209|7364|Denmark
Zero-Magnum
Member
+0|7240

Z-trooper wrote:

Speaking of UAV http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1330627513856269193
Haha. Good stuff right there.
Nabraham
EWWW!!! Thats Nasty!!!
+18|7290|Enon
I got nothing
airborne916
Member
+24|7271
You guys are dumb, the predator UAV has rockes and suff that is can shoot. They just did not put them in the game.
jord
Member
+2,382|7284|The North, beyond the wall.

chittydog wrote:

How is that bad news? Do you think it's better to have our people out there getting killed? You're either a moron or a sadist.
It is bad news if there was no need for armys anymore the world would be boring.just machines killing other machines.
Jarheadz
Member
+2|7239|Austin, Tx

jord wrote:

chittydog wrote:

How is that bad news? Do you think it's better to have our people out there getting killed? You're either a moron or a sadist.
It is bad news if there was no need for armys anymore the world would be boring.just machines killing other machines.
well heres the good thing....at least less human lives arent gonna get killed everyday...
i mean we're just gonna suffer financial prob but not human casualties.

boring? what r u talkin about....think about it....a mechwarrior kind of war....how cool is that?
and chitty was right, war is wrong...its better to scrap some metals than human casualties.
d3x74
Member
+14|7252|NY
Thats not a UAV!

Thats a model RC helicopter wrapped in paper mache' .
Home
Section.80
+447|7454|Seattle, Washington, USA

pokerplaya wrote:

nz built with aussie help.with our weapon that shoots a million rounds a minute mounted to that with a couple of hellfires =pwn.it would take expert gamers like ourselves to operate such a machine.Click here to watch aussie-invention
Wow. That thing is hella powerful.

And to jord. War is not supposed to be exciting and entertaining. "I don't want to save human lives! Then it would be so boring!" Boo-hoo. The rest of usually watch TV, or play BF2.
Arkanon
Member
+3|7301|London, UK

jord wrote:

chittydog wrote:

How is that bad news? Do you think it's better to have our people out there getting killed? You're either a moron or a sadist.
It is bad news if there was no need for armys anymore the world would be boring.just machines killing other machines.
Not what I meant.

At the moment it's a strong disincentive having to send real troops into battle, so a decent president wouldn't do it unless the security of the nation actually depended on it. (Bush seems to have got confused on this criteria.)

If no real troops are needed to ravage foreign lands, then jackasses like Bush will more readily wage war. Just because you don't care about foreign lives lost, chittydog, doesn't mean everyone is so shortsighted.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard